IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v7y2019i2p1387-1403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How enterprise risk management (erm) can affect on short-term and long-term firm performance: evidence from the Iranian banking system

Author

Listed:
  • Arash Khalili Nasr

    (Sharif University of Technology, Iran)

  • Saideh Alaei

    (Sharif University of Technology, Iran)

  • Fateme Bakhshi

    (Sharif University of Technology, Iran)

  • Farzin Rasoulyan

    (Sharif University of Technology, Iran)

  • Hojat Tayaran

    (Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran)

  • Mohammad Farahi

    (University of Isfahan, Iran)

Abstract

Enterprise risk management (ERM) has emerged as a more integrated risk management (IRM) framework in recent years. Many studies have been conducted in recent years to determine the effects of ERM implementation on other parts of an organization. The purpose of this research was to explore the relationship between ERM implementation and organizational performance. The research sample consisted of Iranian banks that either had a license from the central bank of Iran (CBI) or were active in the stock market. A novel measure of ERM implementation was employed in this study. Furthermore, the return on equity (ROE) and Tobin's Q ratio were used as two measures of organizational performance. The results showed that there was a positive and significant relationship between ERM implementation and Tobin's Q ratio, whereas such a significant relationship was not observed between ERM implementation and ROE. The study findings suggested that the adoption of an ERM strategy influences the long-term performance of a firm, not its short-term performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Arash Khalili Nasr & Saideh Alaei & Fateme Bakhshi & Farzin Rasoulyan & Hojat Tayaran & Mohammad Farahi, 2019. "How enterprise risk management (erm) can affect on short-term and long-term firm performance: evidence from the Iranian banking system," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1387-1403, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:1387-1403
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(41)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/26/Nasr_How_enterprise_risk_management_erm_can_affect_on_shortterm_and_longterm_firm_performance_evidence_from_the_Iranian_banking_system.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/444
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(41)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Ai & Vickie Bajtelsmit & Tianyang Wang, 2018. "The Combined Effect of Enterprise Risk Management and Diversification on Property and Casualty Insurer Performance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 85(2), pages 513-543, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu, 2020. "Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Courtney B. Baggett & Cassandra R. Cole, 2023. "Insurance groups, product diversification, and the role of surplus lines affiliation," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 26(1), pages 35-56, March.
    2. Evan M. Eastman & Jianren Xu, 2021. "Market reactions to enterprise risk management adoption, incorporation by rating agencies, and ORSA Act passage," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 151-180, June.
    3. Eduart Villanueva & María Antonia Nuñez & Izaias Martins, 2022. "Impact Of Risk Governance, Associated Practices and Tools on Enterprise Risk Management: Some Evidence from Colombia," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 14(1), pages 187-206, January.
    4. Patty Duijm & Ilke Van Beveren, 2022. "Product diversification as a performance boosting strategy? Drivers and impact of diversification strategies in the property‐liability insurance industry," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(3), pages 303-328, September.
    5. Chih-Te Yang & Yensen Ni & Mu-Hsiang Yu & Yuhsin Chen & Paoyu Huang, 2023. "Decoding the Profitability of Insurance Products: A Novel Approach to Evaluating Non-Participating and Participating Insurance Policies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Doureige J. Jurdi & Sam M. AlGhnaimat, 2021. "The Effects of ERM Adoption on European Insurance Firms Performance and Risks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Vo, Dinh-Tri, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and solvency: The case of the listed EU insurers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 360-369.
    8. Patrick Dahmen, 2023. "Organizational resilience as a key property of enterprise risk management in response to novel and severe crisis events," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 26(2), pages 203-245, July.
    9. Muhammed Altuntas & Thomas R. Berry-Stölzle & J. David Cummins, 2021. "Enterprise risk management and economies of scale and scope: evidence from the German insurance industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 811-845, April.
    10. Yu Zhao & Huaming Du & Qing Li & Fuzhen Zhuang & Ji Liu & Gang Kou, 2022. "A Comprehensive Survey on Enterprise Financial Risk Analysis from Big Data Perspective," Papers 2211.14997, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    11. Baltuttis, Dennik & Töppel, Jannick & Tränkler, Timm & Wiethe, Christian, 2020. "Managing the risks of energy efficiency insurances in a portfolio context: An actuarial diversification approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Gulnara N. Kaigorodova* & Guzel Kh. Pyrkova & Alfiya A. Mustafina & Darya P. Alyakina & Ksenia A. Syvorotkina, 2018. "Mechanisms for Compensation of Damage," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 387-391:1.
    13. Courtney B. Baggett & Cassandra R. Cole & George Crowley & E. Tice Sirmans, 2020. "Spillover effects of increased health insurance enrollment on workers’ compensation insurance," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 53-74, March.
    14. Rami Shaheen & Mehmet Ağa & Husam Rjoub & Ahmad Abualrub, 2020. "Investigation of the Pillars of Sustainability Risk Management as an Extension of Enterprise Risk Management on Palestinian Insurance Firms’ Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Adam, Mukhtar & Soliman, Alaa. M. & Mahtab, Nehal, 2023. "Measuring enterprise risk management implementation: A multifaceted approach for the banking sector," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 244-256.
    16. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu, 2020. "Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    enterprise risk management; organizational risk management; integrated risk management system; Iranian banking system; firm performance; return on equity; Tobin’s Q ratio;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:1387-1403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.