IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i5d10.1007_s11269-024-04013-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Flood Hazard Assessment Based on Machine Learning Model

Author

Listed:
  • Guoyi Li

    (Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University)

  • Weiwei Shao

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research)

  • Xin Su

    (The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute)

  • Yong Li

    (Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University)

  • Yi Zhang

    (Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University)

  • Tianxu Song

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research)

Abstract

Floods are one of the most frequent natural disasters, and their occurrence usually results in enormous loss of life and property. The prediction of flood-prone locations is difficult due to climate change and human factors. In this study, K-means, BP, SVM and RF machine learning models were used for urban flood hazard assessment. A typical rainstorm (“2007.7.18”) occurrence in the study area was simulated based on the TELEMAC-2D hydrodynamic model. Based on the flood distribution, 3281 flood-prone and 2227 non-flood-prone points were extracted to constitute a sample dataset, which was used for training and testing of the machine learning model. The performance of the machine learning model was evaluated using five evaluation metrics (Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-score, Root Mean Square Error) as well as ROC curves and AUC values. The results show that the RF algorithm can better utilize the metrics data and the model performance performance is optimally. Finally, the flood risk distribution map obtained from the machine learning model was compared with actual location of inundation to verify the accuracy of the model. In the risk distribution map obtained by BP model, 63.855% and 18.072% of the flood-prone points were located in the very high and high risk zones, respectively; In the risk distribution map obtained by the RF model, 43.373% and 36.145% of the flood-prone points were located in the very high and high risk zones, respectively. In this paper, the obtained flood risk assessment results can provide scientific references for urban flood risk management and flood prevention and drainage.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoyi Li & Weiwei Shao & Xin Su & Yong Li & Yi Zhang & Tianxu Song, 2025. "Urban Flood Hazard Assessment Based on Machine Learning Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(5), pages 1953-1970, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04013-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-04013-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-04013-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-04013-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Chen & Jiquan Zhang & Lifeng Zhang & Yingyue Sun, 2014. "Evaluation of Resident Evacuations in Urban Rainstorm Waterlogging Disasters Based on Scenario Simulation: Daoli District (Harbin, China) as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    2. M. Abdellatif & W. Atherton & R. Alkhaddar & Y. Osman, 2015. "Flood risk assessment for urban water system in a changing climate using artificial neural network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 1059-1077, November.
    3. Philip J. Ward & Brenden Jongman & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts & Paul D. Bates & Wouter J. W. Botzen & Andres Diaz Loaiza & Stephane Hallegatte & Jarl M. Kind & Jaap Kwadijk & Paolo Scussolini & Hessel C. W, 2017. "A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 642-646, September.
    4. Wei Xie & Wen Nie & Pooya Saffari & Luis F. Robledo & Pierre-Yves Descote & Wenbin Jian, 2021. "Landslide hazard assessment based on Bayesian optimization–support vector machine in Nanping City, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 931-948, October.
    5. Jijian Lian & Hongshi Xu & Kui Xu & Chao Ma, 2017. "Optimal management of the flooding risk caused by the joint occurrence of extreme rainfall and high tide level in a coastal city," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(1), pages 183-200, October.
    6. Gerardo Benito & Michel Lang & Mariano Barriendos & M. Llasat & Felix Francés & Taha Ouarda & Varyl Thorndycraft & Yehouda Enzel & Andras Bardossy & Denis Coeur & Bernard Bobée, 2004. "Use of Systematic, Palaeoflood and Historical Data for the Improvement of Flood Risk Estimation. Review of Scientific Methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 31(3), pages 623-643, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junfei Chen & Juan Ji & Huimin Wang & Menghua Deng & Cong Yu, 2020. "Risk Assessment of Urban Rainstorm Disaster Based on Multi-Layer Weighted Principal Component Analysis: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Cesar Casiano Flores & Joep Crompvoets & Maria Eugenia Ibarraran Viniegra & Megan Farrelly, 2019. "Governance Assessment of the Flood’s Infrastructure Policy in San Pedro Cholula, Mexico: Potential for a Leapfrog to Water Sensitive," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Cong Quan Nguyen & Duc Anh Nguyen & Hieu Trung Tran & Thanh Trung Nguyen & Bui Thi Phuong Thao & Nguyen Tien Cong & Tran Phong & Hiep Le & Indra Prakash & Binh Thai Pham, 2025. "Predicting landslide and debris flow susceptibility using Logitboost alternating decision trees and ensemble techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(2), pages 1661-1686, January.
    4. Quntao Yang & Shuliang Zhang & Qiang Dai & Rui Yao, 2020. "Improved Framework for Assessing Vulnerability to Different Types of Urban Floods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Junqiang Xia & Yifei Cheng & Meirong Zhou & Shanshan Deng & Xiaolei Zhang, 2023. "Experimental and numerical model studies of dike-break induced flood processes over a typical floodplain domain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1843-1861, March.
    6. Fanzhang Zeng & Sifan Jin & Lei Ye & Xuezhi Gu & Jun Guo, 2023. "Analysis of flood conveyance capacity of small- and medium-sized river and flood managements," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 447-467, March.
    7. Tesselaar, Max & Botzen, W.J. Wouter & Robinson, Peter J. & Aerts, Jeroen C.J.H. & Zhou, Fujin, 2022. "Charity hazard and the flood insurance protection gap: An EU scale assessment under climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Julien Boulange & Yukiko Hirabayashi & Masahiro Tanoue & Toshinori Yamada, 2023. "Quantitative evaluation of flood damage methodologies under a portfolio of adaptation scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 1855-1879, September.
    9. Syed Abu Shoaib & Mohammad Zaved Kaiser Khan & Nahid Sultana & Taufique H. Mahmood, 2021. "Quantifying Uncertainty in Food Security Modeling," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Xiaoyi Liu & Yiqin Chen & Heng Zhang & Jiang Chang, 2025. "An Evaluation of Sponge City Construction and a Zoning Construction Strategy from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces: A Case Study of Suzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Huafei Yu & Yaolong Zhao & Yingchun Fu, 2019. "Optimization of Impervious Surface Space Layout for Prevention of Urban Rainstorm Waterlogging: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    12. Mel Oliveira Guirro & Gean Paulo Michel, 2023. "Hydrological and hydrodynamic reconstruction of a flood event in a poorly monitored basin: a case study in the Rolante River, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 723-743, May.
    13. Hao Gao & Yuqi Han & Jiahao Zhang & Yuanzhen Song & Tianlin Zhang & Fengliang Tang & Su Sun, 2025. "A Supply–Demand-Driven Framework for Evaluating Service Effectiveness of University Campus Emergency Shelter: Evidence from Central Tianjin Under Earthquake Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-40, July.
    14. Huaibin Wei & Liyuan Zhang & Jing Liu, 2022. "Hydrodynamic Modelling and Flood Risk Analysis of Urban Catchments under Multiple Scenarios: A Case Study of Dongfeng Canal District, Zhengzhou," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Meiling Zhou & Xiuli Feng & Kaikai Liu & Chi Zhang & Lijian Xie & Xiaohe Wu, 2021. "An Alternative Risk Assessment Model of Urban Waterlogging: A Case Study of Ningbo City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Hongshi Xu & Kui Xu & Lingling Bin & Jijian Lian & Chao Ma, 2018. "Joint Risk of Rainfall and Storm Surges during Typhoons in a Coastal City of Haidian Island, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Hongshi Xu & Kui Xu & Tianye Wang & Wanjie Xue, 2022. "Investigating Flood Risks of Rainfall and Storm Tides Affected by the Parameter Estimation Coupling Bivariate Statistics and Hydrodynamic Models in the Coastal City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Hao Chen & Zongxue Xu & Yang Liu & Yixuan Huang & Fang Yang, 2022. "Urban Flood Risk Assessment Based on Dynamic Population Distribution and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Alena Kadetova & Yan Radziminovich, 2014. "The catastrophic flood in Transbaikalia (Central Asia) in 1897: case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 72(2), pages 423-441, June.
    20. Krichene, H. & Geiger, T. & Frieler, K. & Willner, S.N. & Sauer, I. & Otto, C., 2021. "Long-term impacts of tropical cyclones and fluvial floods on economic growth – Empirical evidence on transmission channels at different levels of development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04013-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.