IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v32y2018i4d10.1007_s11269-017-1867-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance Conditions for Improving Quality Drinking Water Resources: the Need for Enhancing Connectivity

Author

Listed:
  • Susanne Wuijts

    (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
    Utrecht University)

  • Peter P. J. Driessen

    (Utrecht University)

  • Helena F. M. W. Rijswick

    (Utrecht University)

Abstract

Realising the water quality objectives of the European Water Framework Directive have appeared to stagnate over the last decade all across Europe because of their highly complex nature. In literature, governance approaches tend to be regarded as the best way of dealing with complex water issues, but so far little empirical evidence has been reported on this perspective in regard to water quality issues and thus identifying relevant interventions for both policy makers and other stakeholders. In this paper we have analysed how conditions of governance contribute to the realisation of water quality objectives at different types of drinking water resources in the Netherlands. The water quality challenges at these resources, nitrates, pesticides, industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals, can be recognized in other European countries as well. The analysis demonstrates the importance to enhance connectivity between institutional levels and upstream regions based upon the characteristics of the water system and driving forces for water quality and thus involve the actors that have the authority and the means to take effective measures. The two other important conditions of governance approaches for water quality improvement which were identified are the use of joint fact-finding to gain a shared perception of risks, and the use of explicit decision-making and close monitoring of outcomes (re. water quality improvement).

Suggested Citation

  • Susanne Wuijts & Peter P. J. Driessen & Helena F. M. W. Rijswick, 2018. "Governance Conditions for Improving Quality Drinking Water Resources: the Need for Enhancing Connectivity," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(4), pages 1245-1260, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:32:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1867-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1867-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-017-1867-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-017-1867-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florence Metz & Karin Ingold, 2014. "Sustainable Wastewater Management: Is it Possible to Regulate Micropollution in the Future by Learning from the Past? A Policy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Jitske van Popering-Verkerk & Arwin van Buuren, 2016. "Decision-Making Patterns in Multilevel Governance: The contribution of informal and procedural interactions to significant multilevel decisions," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 951-971, August.
    3. Julia Leventon, 2015. "Explaining implementation deficits through multi-level governance in the EU's new member states: EU limits for arsenic in drinking water in Hungary," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 1137-1153, July.
    4. Blackstock, K.L. & Waylen, K.A. & Dunglinson, J. & Marshall, K.M., 2012. "Linking process to outcomes — Internal and external criteria for a stakeholder involvement in River Basin Management Planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 113-122.
    5. Marleen van Rijswick & Jurian Edelenbos & Petra Hellegers & Matthijs Kok & Stefan Kuks, 2014. "Ten building blocks for sustainable water governance: an integrated method to assess the governance of water," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 725-742, September.
    6. Jasper M. Dalhuisen & Caroline A. Rodenburg & Henri L.F. De Groot & Peter Nijkamp, 2003. "Sustainable Water Management Policy: Lessons from Amsterdam," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 263-281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liesbeth Claassen & Julia Hartmann & Susanne Wuijts, 2021. "How to Address Consumers’ Concerns and Information Needs about Emerging Chemical and Microbial Contaminants in Drinking Water; The Case of GenX in The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Christine J. Kirchhoff & Julia A. Flagg & Yan Zhuang & Berdakh Utemuratov, 2019. "Understanding and Improving Enforcement and Compliance with Drinking Water Standards," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(5), pages 1647-1663, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susanne Wuijts & Helena F. M. W. Van Rijswick & Peter P. J. Driessen, 2021. "Achieving European Water Quality Ambitions: Governance Conditions for More Effective Approaches at the Local-Regional Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Susanne Wuijts & Peter P. J. Driessen & Helena F. M. W. Van Rijswick, 2018. "Towards More Effective Water Quality Governance: A Review of Social-Economic, Legal and Ecological Perspectives and Their Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Cesar Casiano Flores & Joep Crompvoets & Maria Eugenia Ibarraran Viniegra & Megan Farrelly, 2019. "Governance Assessment of the Flood’s Infrastructure Policy in San Pedro Cholula, Mexico: Potential for a Leapfrog to Water Sensitive," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Griewald, Yuliana & Rauschmayer, Felix, 2013. "Exploring a nature-related conflict from a capability perspective," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2013, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    5. Pietro Previtali & Eugenio Salvati, 2021. "Area Social Plans and Local Governance of Interorganizational Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Huang, Cui & Yang, Chao & Su, Jun, 2021. "Identifying core policy instruments based on structural holes: A case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    7. Roth, Alyssa P. & de Loë, Rob C., 2017. "Incorporating Outcomes from Collaborative Processes into Government Decision Making: A Case Study from Low Water Response Planning in Ontario, Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 169-178.
    8. Zongmin Li & Shuyan Xu & Liming Yao, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Mining of Sponge City: Trends, Foci and Challenges Standing Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Özerol, Gül & Bressers, Hans, 2017. "“Governance restricts”: A contextual assessment of the wastewater treatment policy in the Guadalupe River Basin, Mexico," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 29-40.
    10. Patricia Wouters & Huiping Chen, 2015. "Editors' Introduction," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Lhawang Ugyel, 2022. "Governance networks in the delivery of public healthcare services in the Pacific: Implementation of the Bougainville Healthy Communities Programme," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 23-38, January.
    12. Eva Lieberherr & Olivia Odom Green, 2018. "Green Infrastructure through Citizen Stormwater Management: Policy Instruments, Participation and Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Tong Xu, 2023. "Depicting Rubin’s Vase or Faces: Clarifying the Practical Value of Integrated Water Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Grilli, Gianluca & Curtis, John, 2021. "Knowledge and awareness of water quality protection issues within Local Authorities," Papers WP712, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    15. Marina Knickel & Karlheinz Knickel & Francesca Galli & Damian Maye & Johannes S. C. Wiskerke, 2019. "Towards a Reflexive Framework for Fostering Co—Learning and Improvement of Transdisciplinary Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Florence Metz & Karin Ingold, 2017. "Politics of the precautionary principle: assessing actors’ preferences in water protection policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 721-743, December.
    17. María J. López-Serrano & Juan F. Velasco-Muñoz & José A. Aznar-Sánchez & Isabel M. Román-Sánchez, 2020. "Sustainable Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: A Bibliometric Analysis of Worldwide Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Sabrina Kirschke & Jens Newig, 2017. "Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. S. H. A. Koop & L. Koetsier & A. Doornhof & O. Reinstra & C. J. Van Leeuwen & S. Brouwer & C. Dieperink & P. P. J. Driessen, 2017. "Assessing the Governance Capacity of Cities to Address Challenges of Water, Waste, and Climate Change," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3427-3443, September.
    20. Martin-Ortega, Julia & Perni, Angel & Jackson-Blake, Leah & Balana, Bedru B. & Mckee, Annie & Dunn, Sarah & Helliwell, Rachel & Psaltopoulos, Demetris & Skuras, Dimitris & Cooksley, Susan & Slee, Bill, 2015. "A transdisciplinary approach to the economic analysis of the European Water Framework Directive," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 34-45.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:32:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1867-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.