IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/trosos/v17y2023i1d10.1007_s12626-023-00134-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Lost Property of Telework During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: From the Perspective of Sociomateriality and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroshi Koga

    (Kansai University)

Abstract

When telework was discussed in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic, the context of staying home was strongly considered. As a result, the primary focus has been on carrying out one's assigned work at home. In other words, people tend to focus on the fact that they can carry out their work without being restricted by location. However, the networked aspect of telework is important. In other words, to realize telework, it is necessary to fully consider the aspect of making one's own work visible and collaborating with others. In this paper, the author clarifies the significance of the "connection" that information systems engender by examining the mechanism of inducing organizational citizenship behaviour from the perspective of “sociomateriality” proposed by Wanda Orlikowski et al. in information systems research. Furthermore, we warn against “discretionary bias,” a tendency to “free oneself from the constraints of time and place,” which appears, because telework was introduced as a measure to prevent the spread of infection. In addition, this paper examines the case of intranets in the 1990s to clarify the nature of connection through information systems and to find new insights in old cases, just as the Industrial Revolution is referenced in discussions of whether AI will take away jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroshi Koga, 2023. "On the Lost Property of Telework During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: From the Perspective of Sociomateriality and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 73-86, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:trosos:v:17:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12626-023-00134-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12626-023-00134-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12626-023-00134-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12626-023-00134-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt6j96d49k is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Allen S. Lee, 1991. "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 342-365, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arvin Sahaym & Joseph Vithayathil & Suprateek Sarker & Saonee Sarker & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2023. "Value Destruction in Information Technology Ecosystems: A Mixed-Method Investigation with Interpretive Case Study and Analytical Modeling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 508-531, June.
    2. Xuequn Wang & Leonard M. Jessup, 2014. "A Review and Synthesis of Entrepreneurship Research: Towards an Integrative Model of Dependent Variables," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 23(2), pages 163-199, September.
    3. Joerg Becker & Bjoern Niehaves & Karsten Klose, 2005. "A Framework for Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-1.
    4. Jansen, E. Pieter, 2002. "The use of performance information case studies in local social services departments," Research Report 02A19, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    5. Allen S. Lee & Richard L. Baskerville, 2003. "Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 221-243, September.
    6. Bradley C. Wheeler, 2002. "NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 125-146, June.
    7. Goles, Tim & Hirschheim, Rudy, 2000. "The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead...long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 249-268, June.
    8. repec:dgr:rugsom:02a19 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Sajda Qureshi & Doug Vogel, 2001. "Adaptiveness in Virtual Teams: Organisational Challenges and Research Directions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 27-46, January.
    10. van Fenema, P.C. & Qureshi, S., 2004. "A Phenomenological Exploration of Adaptation in a Polycontextual Work Environment," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2004-061-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Devi Akella, 2007. "Pain and Stress in Learning Organizations," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 323-333, December.
    12. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    13. Haque, Md Ziaul & Qian, Aimin & Hoque, Md Rakibul & Lucky, Suraiea Akter, 2022. "A unified framework for exploring the determinants of online social networks (OSNs) on institutional investors’ capital market investment decision," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Saranga, Haritha & George, Rejie & Beine, Judith & Arnold, Ulli, 2018. "Resource configurations, product development capability, and competitive advantage: An empirical analysis of their evolution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 32-50.
    15. Harris, Simon, 2000. "Reconciling positive and interpretative international management research: a native category approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 755-770, December.
    16. Michelle Richey & Aparna Gonibeed & M. N. Ravishankar, 2018. "The Perils and Promises of Self-Disclosure on Social Media," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 425-437, June.
    17. Sana Mumtaz, 2022. "Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1245-1259, June.
    18. Tracey Wond & Michael Macaulay, 2011. "Extending Time -- Extended Benefits," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 309-320, February.
    19. Qibin Lu & Deping Zhong & Qiang Zhang, 2020. "The evolving pattern of NGOs’ participating in post-disaster community reconstruction in China: cases study on the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and the 2013 Lushan earthquake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 167-184, October.
    20. Chan, Chui Shiam & Pattnaik, Chinmay, 2021. "Coevolution of home country support and internationalization of emerging market firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    21. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:trosos:v:17:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12626-023-00134-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.