IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v38y2025i2d10.1007_s11213-025-09724-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Viable System Model to Support Sustainable Self-Governance in Communities: Learning from Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Espinosa

    (University of Hull
    Exeter University)

  • Andrea C. Martinez-Lozada

    (Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga)

Abstract

While several authors suggest a complex systems approach to promote self-governance in social systems, not many have explained its meaning in the context of communities, and how it can provide support towards more endogenous ways of development. We introduce our approach to the Viable System Model (VSM) and the way it can be applied for supporting more viable and sustainable communities, self-governed and more capable of effectively implementing endogenous development strategies. Based on the way it supports individuals to develop their potential and to engage in deciding on their development options, we argue that this is an emancipatory systems approach. We first present a recent case study in a very poor community in New Giron, Santander, Colombia, led by a local university, where we followed VSM criteria to design a meta-systemic management organisation promoting community members’ self-organisation to co-design and implement innovative development initiatives. We also used the idea of a Regional Innovation System (RIS), which is intended to facilitate and nurture community’s development initiatives based on the development of local skills. We explain how the RIS framework contributes to clarify issues of self-governance when applying the VSM in a community aiming to improve their development skills, by suggesting mechanisms to facilitate social innovation. We show how the RIS & VSM inspired organisation helped the community to have access to knowledge and resources to effectively implement their initiatives to implement projects to fight poverty. We compare this case study with recent VSM applications in a similar region, to support sustainable self-governance in communities, by using an assessment framework inspired by VSM criteria, and critically reflect on the learning from each project. We finally argue how our way of understanding and applying the VSM as an emancipatory systems approach responds to previous criticisms of the VSM.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Espinosa & Andrea C. Martinez-Lozada, 2025. "The Viable System Model to Support Sustainable Self-Governance in Communities: Learning from Case Studies," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:38:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11213-025-09724-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-025-09724-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-025-09724-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-025-09724-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Spigel, 2017. "The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 49-72, January.
    2. Bjørn Asheim & Ron Boschma & Philip Cooke, 2011. "Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 893-904.
    3. Zoltan J. Acs & Erik Stam & David B. Audretsch & Allan O’Connor, 2017. "The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Espinosa, Angela & Walker, J., 2013. "Complexity management in practice: A Viable System Model intervention in an Irish eco-community," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 118-129.
    5. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl, 2011. "Regional Innovation Systems," Chapters, in: Philip Cooke & Bjørn Asheim & Ron Boschma & Ron Martin & Dafna Schwartz & Franz Tödtling (ed.), Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth, chapter 33, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Espinosa, A. & Duque, C., 2018. "Complexity management and multi-scale governance: A case study in an Amazonian indigenous association," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1006-1020.
    7. Erik Stam, 2018. "Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Allan O'Connor & Erik Stam & Fiona Sussan & David B. Audretsch (ed.), Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, pages 173-197, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvedalen, Janna & Carlsson, Bo, 2021. "Scaling up in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A comparative study of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Life Science," Papers in Innovation Studies 2021/9, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Svetlana V. Orekhova & Andrey V. Misyura, 2021. "Agriculture and industry in Russia: Are there any indications of an entrepreneurial ecosystem?," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 69-83, October.
    3. Mirella Schrijvers & Niels Bosma & Erik Stam, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Structural Change in European Regions," Working Papers 2202, Utrecht School of Economics.
    4. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2023. "The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem of Food Festivals—A Vendors’ Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Fahimeh Khatami & Enrico Cagno & Luboš Smrčka & Zoltan Rozsa, 2024. "Assessing the role of FinTech in entrepreneurial ecosystems at the international level," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3373-3402, December.
    6. Carayannis, Elias G. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Wurth, Bernd, 2022. "OR for entrepreneurial ecosystems: A problem-oriented review and agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 791-808.
    7. Liu, Jiali & Zhou, Haibo & Chen, Feng & Yu, Jiang, 2022. "The coevolution of innovation ecosystems and the strategic growth paths of knowledge-intensive enterprises: The case of China’s integrated circuit design industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 428-439.
    8. Maksim Belitski & Ana-Maria Grigore & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Political entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship ecosystem perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1973-2004, December.
    9. Sivert Hammer & Tore Frimanslund, 2022. "Lessons from a rural ecosystem," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 37(5), pages 348-363, August.
    10. Erik Stam & Andrew Ven, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 809-832, February.
    11. Bessagnet, Arnauld & Crespo, Joan & Vicente, Jérôme, 2021. "Unraveling the multi-scalar and evolutionary forces of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A historical event analysis applied to IoT Valley," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Mungila Hillemane Bala Subrahmanya, 2022. "Competitiveness of High-Tech Start-Ups and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: An Overview," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, June.
    13. Amy K. Morris & Antje Fiedler & David B. Audretsch, 2024. "Enablers of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship in entrepreneurial ecosystems: synthesis and future directions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1737-1761, October.
    14. Fahimeh Khatami & Veronica Scuotto & Norris Krueger & Valter Cantino, 2022. "The influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem model on sustainable innovation from a macro-level lens," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1419-1451, December.
    15. Jianhong Zhang & Désirée Gorp & Henk Kievit, 2023. "Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1077-1105, June.
    16. da Fonseca, André Luís A. & Chimenti, Paula & Campos, Roberta D., 2023. "‘Take my advice’: Entrepreneurial consumers and the ecosystemic logics of digital platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Hannigan, Timothy R. & Briggs, Anthony R. & Valadao, Rodrigo & Seidel, Marc-David L. & Jennings, P. Devereaux, 2022. "A new tool for policymakers: Mapping cultural possibilities in an emerging AI entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    18. Tore Frimanslund, 2022. "Financial Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: An Analysis of Urban and Rural Regions of Norway," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 24-39, June.
    19. Melita Nicotra & Marco Romano & Manlio Giudice & Carmela Elita Schillaci, 2018. "The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 640-673, June.
    20. Christophe Leyronas & Stéphanie Loup, 2023. "La création de valeur par et pour les entrepreneurs dans un écosystème entrepreneurial : une approche en termes de ressources et de capacités," Post-Print hal-04816732, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:38:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11213-025-09724-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.