IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v33y2024i1d10.1007_s10260-023-00739-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Longitudinal mediation analysis through generalised linear mixed models: a comparison of maximum-likelihood and Bayesian estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Di Maria

    (University of Palermo)

  • Antonino Abbruzzo

    (University of Palermo)

  • Gianfranco Lovison

    (University of Palermo)

Abstract

The main goal of mediation analysis is to estimate the indirect effect of an exposure on a response variable conveyed by an intermediate variable called mediator. Estimating the standard error and confidence interval of the indirect effect using maximum likelihood is challenging even in the traditional setting where each variable is measured a single time and all models are linear, and the issue is exacerbated for longitudinal non-Normal data. Multilevel models are widely used to address longitudinal data, but have some shortcomings in mediational settings. To overcome these issues, we propose to adopt a Bayesian perspective to derive the posterior distribution of the indirect effect in a multilevel modeling framework using Monte Carlo Markov Chains. We run a simulation study to compare the performance of maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation approaches for either linear and nonlinear mediation models. In the linear case, the Bayesian approach outperforms maximum likelihood in terms of bias and coverage rate, while results are more nuanced in nonlinear cases. We conclude by presenting an empirical application to data on how family environment influences students’ attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Di Maria & Antonino Abbruzzo & Gianfranco Lovison, 2024. "Longitudinal mediation analysis through generalised linear mixed models: a comparison of maximum-likelihood and Bayesian estimation," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(1), pages 287-302, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:33:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10260-023-00739-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-023-00739-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-023-00739-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-023-00739-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Daniels & Jason A. Roy & Chanmin Kim & Joseph W. Hogan & Michael G. Perri, 2012. "Bayesian Inference for the Causal Effect of Mediation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1028-1036, December.
    2. Zheng Wenjing & van der Laan Mark, 2017. "Longitudinal Mediation Analysis with Time-varying Mediators and Exposures, with Application to Survival Outcomes," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Donald B. Rubin, 2005. "Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, Decisions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 322-331, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuxi Zeng & Elizabeth C. Lange & Elizabeth A. Archie & Fernando A. Campos & Susan C. Alberts & Fan Li, 2023. "A Causal Mediation Model for Longitudinal Mediators and Survival Outcomes with an Application to Animal Behavior," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(2), pages 197-218, June.
    2. Salvatore Bimonte & Antonella D’Agostino, 2021. "Tourism development and residents’ well-being: Comparing two seaside destinations in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1508-1525, November.
    3. Wu, Guojun & Song, Ge & Lv, Xiaoxiang & Luo, Shikai & Shi, Chengchun & Zhu, Hongtu, 2023. "DNet: distributional network for distributional individualized treatment effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122895, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Sahar Saeed & Erica E. M. Moodie & Erin C. Strumpf & Marina B. Klein, 2018. "Segmented generalized mixed effect models to evaluate health outcomes," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(4), pages 547-551, May.
    5. Yiran Zhang & Andrew Ying & Steve Edland & Lon White & Ronghui Xu, 2024. "Marginal Structural Illness-Death Models for Semi-competing Risks Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 668-692, December.
    6. Manuel S. González Canché, 2017. "Financial Benefits of Rapid Student Loan Repayment: An Analytic Framework Employing Two Decades of Data," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 671(1), pages 154-182, May.
    7. Almer, Christian & Winkler, Ralph, 2017. "Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental policies: The case of the Kyoto Protocol," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 125-151.
    8. Sanford C. Gordon & Hannah K. Simpson, 2020. "Causes, theories, and the past in political science," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 315-333, December.
    9. Angelov, Nikolay & Eliason, Marcus, 2014. "The effects of targeted labour market programs for job seekers with occupational disabilities," Working Paper Series 2014:27, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    10. Mark Kattenberg & Bas Scheer & Jurre Thiel, 2023. "Causal forests with fixed effects for treatment effect heterogeneity in difference-in-differences," CPB Discussion Paper 452, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    11. Slutskin, L., 2017. "Graphical Statistical Methods for Studying Causal Effects. Bayesian Networks," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 36(4), pages 12-30.
    12. Tianmeng Lyu & Björn Bornkamp & Guenther Mueller‐Velten & Heinz Schmidli, 2023. "Bayesian inference for a principal stratum estimand on recurrent events truncated by death," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3792-3802, December.
    13. Riukula, Krista & Väänänen, Touko, 2024. "Estimating the Labour Market Impacts of Transport Projects in Finland," ETLA Working Papers 120, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    14. Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2023. "A second evidence factor for a second control group," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3968-3980, December.
    15. Nicholas Illenberger & Dylan S. Small & Pamela A. Shaw, 2019. "Regression to the Mean's Impact on the Synthetic Control Method: Bias and Sensitivity Analysis," Papers 1909.04706, arXiv.org.
    16. Silvana Tiedemann & Jorge Sanchez Canales & Felix Schur & Raffaele Sgarlato & Lion Hirth & Oliver Ruhnau & Jonas Peters, 2024. "Identifying Elasticities in Autocorrelated Time Series Using Causal Graphs," Papers 2409.15530, arXiv.org.
    17. Gary Henry & Roderick Rose & Doug Lauen, 2014. "Are value-added models good enough for teacher evaluations? Assessing commonly used models with simulated and actual data," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 9, in: Adela García Aracil & Isabel Neira Gómez (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 9, edition 1, volume 9, chapter 20, pages 383-405, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    18. Steven M. Smith, 2019. "The Relative Economic Merits of Alternative Water Rights," Working Papers 2019-08, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    19. Cheng Zheng & Lei Liu, 2022. "Quantifying direct and indirect effect for longitudinal mediator and survival outcome using joint modeling approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1233-1243, September.
    20. Christian Almer & Ralph Winkler, 2012. "The Effect of Kyoto Emission Targets on Domestic CO2 Emissions: A Synthetic Control Approach," Diskussionsschriften dp1202, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:33:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10260-023-00739-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.