IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v17y2025i1d10.1007_s12561-023-09363-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causal Inference with Secondary Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Zhou

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

In this paper, we develop new methods for identifying causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding with continuous treatment and outcome. Under a set of linear structural equation models, we invent two identification strategies by introducing a secondary outcome. Specifically, we utilize the symmetry and asymmetry properties of distributions of random variables to achieve identification. We develop accompanying estimating procedures and evaluate their finite sample performance through simulations and a data application studying the causal effect of tau protein level on behavioral deficits in Alzheimer’s disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Zhou, 2025. "Causal Inference with Secondary Outcomes," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 17(1), pages 3-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:17:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09363-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-023-09363-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-023-09363-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-023-09363-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Lars Peter, 1982. "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 1029-1054, July.
    2. Yixin Wang & David M. Blei, 2019. "The Blessings of Multiple Causes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(528), pages 1574-1596, October.
    3. Cosslett, Stephen R, 1983. "Distribution-Free Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Binary Choice Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(3), pages 765-782, May.
    4. Dengdeng Yu & Linbo Wang & Dehan Kong & Hongtu Zhu, 2022. "Mapping the Genetic-Imaging-Clinical Pathway with Applications to Alzheimer’s Disease," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(540), pages 1656-1668, October.
    5. Yixin Wang & David M. Blei, 2019. "The Blessings of Multiple Causes: Rejoinder," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(528), pages 1616-1619, October.
    6. J. Peters & P. Bühlmann, 2014. "Identifiability of Gaussian structural equation models with equal error variances," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(1), pages 219-228.
    7. Dehan Kong & Shu Yang & Linbo Wang, 2022. "Identifiability of causal effects with multiple causes and a binary outcome [Statistical inference in factor analysis]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(1), pages 265-272.
    8. Zijian Guo & Hyunseung Kang & T. Tony Cai & Dylan S. Small, 2018. "Confidence intervals for causal effects with invalid instruments by using two‐stage hard thresholding with voting," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 793-815, September.
    9. Aurore Delaigle & Peter Hall, 2016. "Methodology for non-parametric deconvolution when the error distribution is unknown," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(1), pages 231-252, January.
    10. Fabrizia Mealli & Barbara Pacini, 2013. "Using Secondary Outcomes to Sharpen Inference in Randomized Experiments With Noncompliance," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(503), pages 1120-1131, September.
    11. John B. Copas & Dan Jackson & Ian R. White & Richard D. Riley, 2018. "The role of secondary outcomes in multivariate meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1177-1205, November.
    12. Hyunseung Kang & Anru Zhang & T. Tony Cai & Dylan S. Small, 2016. "Instrumental Variables Estimation With Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 132-144, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, X.; & Sanderson, E.; & Windmeijer, F.;, 2022. "Selecting Valid Instrumental Variables in Linear Models with Multiple Exposure Variables: Adaptive Lasso and the Median-of-Medians Estimator," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 22/22, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    2. Frank Windmeijer & Xiaoran Liang & Fernando P. Hartwig & Jack Bowden, 2021. "The confidence interval method for selecting valid instrumental variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(4), pages 752-776, September.
    3. Qingliang Fan & Zijian Guo & Ziwei Mei, 2022. "A Heteroskedasticity-Robust Overidentifying Restriction Test with High-Dimensional Covariates," Papers 2205.00171, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    4. Nicolas Apfel & Frank Windmeijer, 2022. "The Falsification Adaptive Set in Linear Models with Instrumental Variables that Violate the Exclusion or Conditional Exogeneity Restriction," Papers 2212.04814, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    5. Hyunseung Kang & Youjin Lee & T. Tony Cai & Dylan S. Small, 2022. "Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 24-34, March.
    6. Hongwei Shi & Xinyu Zhang & Xu Guo & Baihua He & Chenyang Wang, 2025. "Testing overidentifying restrictions on high-dimensional instruments and covariates," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 77(2), pages 331-352, April.
    7. Nicolas Apfel & Xiaoran Liang, 2024. "Agglomerative hierarchical clustering for selecting valid instrumental variables," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(7), pages 1201-1219, November.
    8. Mittelhammer, Ron C. & Judge, George, 2011. "A family of empirical likelihood functions and estimators for the binary response model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 207-217, October.
    9. Geweke, J. & Joel Horowitz & Pesaran, M.H., 2006. "Econometrics: A Bird’s Eye View," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0655, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Frank Windmeijer & Helmut Farbmacher & Neil Davies & George Davey Smith, 2019. "On the Use of the Lasso for Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(527), pages 1339-1350, July.
    11. Hyunseung Kang, 2023. "Discussion on “Instrumented difference‐in‐differences” by Ting Ye, Ashkan Ertefaie, James Flory, Sean Hennessy & Dylan S. Small," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 592-596, June.
    12. Cheng Zheng & Lei Liu, 2022. "Quantifying direct and indirect effect for longitudinal mediator and survival outcome using joint modeling approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1233-1243, September.
    13. Gyuhyeong Goh & Jisang Yu, 2022. "Causal inference with some invalid instrumental variables: A quasi‐Bayesian approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1432-1451, December.
    14. Qingliang Fan & Yaqian Wu, 2020. "Endogenous Treatment Effect Estimation with some Invalid and Irrelevant Instruments," Papers 2006.14998, arXiv.org.
    15. Eric Gautier & Christiern Rose, 2022. "Fast, Robust Inference for Linear Instrumental Variables Models using Self-Normalized Moments," Papers 2211.02249, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    16. Bernard Koch & Tim Sainburg & Pablo Geraldo & Song Jiang & Yizhou Sun & Jacob Gates Foster, 2021. "A Primer on Deep Learning for Causal Inference," Papers 2110.04442, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    17. Hirofumi Fukuyama & Mike Tsionas & Yong Tan, 2024. "Incorporating causal modeling into data envelopment analysis for performance evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1865-1904, November.
    18. Damian Clarke & Benjamín Matta, 2018. "Practical considerations for questionable IVs," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 18(3), pages 663-691, September.
    19. Tsionas, Mike G., 2022. "Convex non-parametric least squares, causal structures and productivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 370-387.
    20. Kumari, Meena & Bao, Yanchun & S. Clarke, Paul & Smart, Melissa, 2018. "A comparison of robust methods for Mendelian randomization using multiple genetic variants," ISER Working Paper Series 2018-08, Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:17:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09363-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.