IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sorede/v35y2024i1d10.1134_s1075700724010180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Crisis of the Electricity Sector in the EU Countries: Dynamics, Driving Forces, and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • S. V. Zhukov

    (E. M. Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • O. B. Reznikova

    (E. M. Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

— Most studies of the current crisis in the EU electricity sector offer a simplified approach to the interpretation of its dynamics and causes. In this article, the approach is expanded, i.e., first, the crisis in the European electricity sector is considered taking into account the long-term trends of its development. Second, the main trends in the performance of individual electricity sectors and in the context of EU member countries are analyzed in detail. This approach allowed us to draw the following fundamental conclusions: the crisis in the EU electricity sector began in 2021 and was caused by the mistakes of regulators who excessively urged the construction of generating capacities in “green” energy and decommissioning of capacities that traditionally provided basic loading in the system; the crisis of 2022 was provoked by the unreliability of nuclear generation due to the obsolescence of reactors, as well as the failure of hydropower due to long-term climate change. The exogenous shock generated by the geopolitical crisis in and around Ukraine became an important factor in the outbreak of a protracted crisis in the European electricity sector. The European Commission and some major European countries proposed to accelerate the construction of generating capacities in solar and wind energy to overcome the crisis, while shifting the costs of the energy transition, the price of which has noticeably increased, to end consumers of electricity. There is a representative group of countries in the EU whose national climate strategies are based, among other things, on promoting nuclear energy, which requires the development of the capacity market; in general, energy prices in the EU soared and further development of “green” energy will by all means push electricity prices up.

Suggested Citation

  • S. V. Zhukov & O. B. Reznikova, 2024. "The Crisis of the Electricity Sector in the EU Countries: Dynamics, Driving Forces, and Prospects," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 60-71, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:35:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1134_s1075700724010180
    DOI: 10.1134/S1075700724010180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1075700724010180
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S1075700724010180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zimmermann, Florian & Keles, Dogan, 2023. "State or market: Investments in new nuclear power plants in France and their domestic and cross-border effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Ueckerdt, Falko & Hirth, Lion & Luderer, Gunnar & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2013. "System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 61-75.
    3. Idel, Robert, 2022. "Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuhji Matsuo, 2022. "Re-Defining System LCOE: Costs and Values of Power Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-39, September.
    2. S. V. Zhukov & O. B. Reznikova, 2023. "Energy Transition in the United States, Europe and China: Latest Trends," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 439-449, August.
    3. Steele, Amanda Harker & Sharma, Smriti & Pena Cabra, Ivonne & Clahane, Luke & Iyengar, Arun, 2023. "A tool for measuring the system cost of replacement energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Jäger, Tobias & McKenna, Russell & Fichtner, Wolf, 2015. "Onshore wind energy in Baden-Württemberg: a bottom-up economic assessment of the socio-technical potential," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 7, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    5. A. Cesar Y. Acevedo Arenas & Yecid A. Muñoz Maldonado & Johann F. Petit Suárez & Duban H. Morales Sánchez & Daniel F. Ramírez Contreras, 2024. "Towards a Standardized LCOE Calculation for Informed Decision-Making in Energy Policy and Investment: Application to the Colombian Context," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 523-541, November.
    6. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    7. Nock, Destenie & Baker, Erin, 2019. "Holistic multi-criteria decision analysis evaluation of sustainable electric generation portfolios: New England case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 655-673.
    8. Rao, A. Gangoli & van den Oudenalder, F.S.C. & Klein, S.A., 2019. "Natural gas displacement by wind curtailment utilization in combined-cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 477-491.
    9. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    10. Chen, Hao & Gao, Xin-Ya & Liu, Jian-Yu & Zhang, Qian & Yu, Shiwei & Kang, Jia-Ning & Yan, Rui & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2020. "The grid parity analysis of onshore wind power in China: A system cost perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-30.
    11. Marshman, Daniel & Brear, Michael & Ring, Brendan, 2022. "Impact of unit commitment and RoCoF constraints on revenue sufficiency in decarbonising wholesale electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    12. Ruhnau, Oliver & Hirth, Lion & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2020. "Heating with wind: Economics of heat pumps and variable renewables," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Lebeau, Alexis & Petitet, Marie & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2024. "Long-term issues with the Energy-Only Market design in the context of deep decarbonization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Giani, Paolo & Tagle, Felipe & Genton, Marc G. & Castruccio, Stefano & Crippa, Paola, 2020. "Closing the gap between wind energy targets and implementation for emerging countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    15. Renaud Coulomb & Oskar Lecuyer & Adrien Vogt-Schilb, 2019. "Optimal Transition from Coal to Gas and Renewable Power Under Capacity Constraints and Adjustment Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(2), pages 557-590, June.
    16. Stocker Klaus, 2020. "Financial and Economic Assessment of Tidal Stream Energy—A Case Study," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Yao, Xing & Yi, Bowen & Yu, Yang & Fan, Ying & Zhu, Lei, 2020. "Economic analysis of grid integration of variable solar and wind power with conventional power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    18. Soria, Rafael & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Szklo, Alexandre & Milani, Rodrigo & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2015. "Hybrid concentrated solar power (CSP)–biomass plants in a semiarid region: A strategy for CSP deployment in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 57-72.
    19. Mezősi, András & Szabó, László & Szabó, Sándor, 2018. "Cost-efficiency benchmarking of European renewable electricity support schemes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 217-226.
    20. Güner, Yusuf Emre, 2018. "The improved screening curve method regarding existing units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 310-326.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:35:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1134_s1075700724010180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.