IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sorede/v32y2021i6d10.1134_s107570072106006x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment Performance Predictions in the Digitization of Nuclear Energy

Author

Listed:
  • V. V. Kharitonov

    (National Research Nuclear University MEPhI)

  • D. Yu. Semenova

    (National Research Nuclear University MEPhI)

  • E. V. Akinfeeva

    (Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

— The article proposes an analytical method for predicting the efficiency of investments in the digitalization of the design, construction and operation of nuclear power plants (NPPs) at the microeconomic level, the costs of which ultimately affect the economic indicators of nuclear power plants that determine the competitiveness of nuclear energy in the energy technology market. As a criterion for assessing the effectiveness of investments in the digitalization of nuclear energy, it is proposed to consider the reduction in the cost and timing of the construction of nuclear power plants, which have the greatest impact on the competitiveness of nuclear power plants. The results of calculating the present value of NPP electricity, the investment payback period and the internal rate of return, depending on the observed delays and the corresponding growth in the cost of NPP construction, demonstrate reserves for their reduction due to the digitalization of business processes in the NPP life cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • V. V. Kharitonov & D. Yu. Semenova & E. V. Akinfeeva, 2021. "Investment Performance Predictions in the Digitization of Nuclear Energy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 662-667, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:32:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1134_s107570072106006x
    DOI: 10.1134/S107570072106006X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S107570072106006X
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S107570072106006X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovering, Jessica R. & Yip, Arthur & Nordhaus, Ted, 2016. "Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 371-382.
    2. N. A. Ganichev & O. B. Koshovets, 2021. "Forcing the Digital Economy: How will the Structure of Digital Markets Change as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 11-22, January.
    3. I. E. Frolov, 2019. "Russian High-Technology Complex under Low Inflation and Government Support Limitation: The Condition, Capacity and Tendencies for Development," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 365-375, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shatha Mustafa Abdallah Al Qudah & José Luis Fuentes Bargues & Pablo Ferrer Gisbert, 2024. "The Effect of COVID-19 on the Research Trends on Project Risk Management and Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14578-14596, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. A. Ganichev & O. B. Koshovets, 2022. "Rethinking Russian Digital Economy Development Under Sunctions," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 645-655, December.
    2. A. N. Klepach & L. B. Vodovatov & E. A. Dmitrieva, 2022. "Russian Science and Technology: Rise or Progressive Lag (Part I)," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 631-644, December.
    3. Jasiūnas, Justinas & Lund, Peter D. & Mikkola, Jani, 2021. "Energy system resilience – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Elaheh Shobeiri & Filippo Genco & Daniel Hoornweg & Akira Tokuhiro, 2023. "Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Obstacles to Be Overcome," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Kim, Eun-Hwan & Park, Yong-Gi & Roh, Jae Hyung, 2019. "Competitiveness of open-cycle gas turbine and its potential in the future Korean electricity market with high renewable energy mix," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1056-1069.
    6. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.
    7. Sanghyun Hong & Barry W. Brook, 2018. "At the crossroads: An uncertain future facing the electricity‐generation sector in South Korea," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 522-532, September.
    8. Fernando Barros Jr & Victor R. Rodrigues, 2021. "On the determinants of a stable long-run relationship between energy consumption and economic growth," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 147-171.
    9. Lilia A. Valitova & Elena R. Sharko & Marina Yu. Sheresheva, 2021. "Identifying industrial clusters based on the analysis of business ties: A case of the textile industry," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 59-74, September.
    10. Wang, Shanyong & Wang, Jing & Lin, Shoufu & Li, Jun, 2019. "Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: The role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 352-360.
    11. Vladimir Litvinenko, 2020. "The Role of Hydrocarbons in the Global Energy Agenda: The Focus on Liquefied Natural Gas," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Schmeda-Lopez, Diego & McConnaughy, Thomas B. & McFarland, Eric W., 2018. "Radiation enhanced chemical production: Improving the value proposition of nuclear power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 491-504.
    13. Huňady Ján & Pisár Peter & Khawaja Sarwar & Qureshi Fayyaz Hussain, 2024. "The Digital Transformation of European Union Countries before and during COVID-19," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 22-45.
    14. Bistline, John E., 2016. "Energy technology R&D portfolio management: Modeling uncertain returns and market diffusion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1181-1196.
    15. Bartnik, Ryszard & Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna, 2025. "Evaluation of energy and economic efficiency in upgrading coal-fired power plants: Integrating HTGR reactors and turboexpanders for supercritical steam parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    16. Jewell, Jessica & Vetier, Marta & Garcia-Cabrera, Daniel, 2019. "The international technological nuclear cooperation landscape: A new dataset and network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 838-852.
    17. Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2020. "Value of technology in the U.S. electric power sector: Impacts of full portfolios and technological change on the costs of meeting decarbonization goals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Rizki Firmansyah Setya Budi & Moch. Djoko Birmano & Elok Satiti Amitayani, 2021. "Selection of Large-scale Nuclear Power Plant Based on Economic and Reliability Aspects in Indonesian Power System," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 42-51.
    19. Sascha Samadi, 2016. "A Review of Factors Influencing the Cost Development of Electricity Generation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Ford, Michael J. & Schrag, Daniel P., 2019. "The case for a tortoise approach to US nuclear research and development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:32:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1134_s107570072106006x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.