IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v5y2025i6d10.1007_s43546-025-00838-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling bitcoin volatility: a comparative analysis of alternatives to the GARCH approach

Author

Listed:
  • Noorshanaaz Khodabaccus

    (University of Technology, Mauritius)

  • Aslam A. E. F. Saib

    (University of Technology, Mauritius)

Abstract

Bitcoin is usually characterised by high volatility and the resulting high risk levels coupled with regulatory uncertainties commonly associated with the cryptocurrency market, may negatively impact risk-averse investors. As such, reliable volatility modelling and forecasting approaches are crucial in understanding the digitalised cash system’s risk characteristics. This study makes several key contributions. First, it introduces the sinusoidal-enhanced Fourier grey Markov model (FOGMS), designed to improve forecasting accuracy for highly volatile datasets like Bitcoin by capturing oscillatory patterns and random fluctuations more effectively. Second, the study conducts a comparative analysis of conventional time series methods, such as ARMA and GARCH models, against the enhanced FOGM model, demonstrating its superior performance in forecasting Bitcoin volatility across four test cases. Finally, through empirical testing, the proposed FOGMS model achieves a very good correlation, significantly lower RMSE and Log Cosh values in all test cases, outperforming traditional time series approaches in predictive accuracy thus offering valuable insights into advanced grey models for financial forecasting in volatile markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Noorshanaaz Khodabaccus & Aslam A. E. F. Saib, 2025. "Modelling bitcoin volatility: a comparative analysis of alternatives to the GARCH approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:5:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s43546-025-00838-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-025-00838-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-025-00838-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-025-00838-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soosung Hwang & Pedro L. Valls Pereira, 2006. "Small sample properties of GARCH estimates and persistence," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6-7), pages 473-494.
    2. Matei, Marius, 2009. "Assessing Volatility Forecasting Models: Why GARCH Models Take the Lead," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 42-65, December.
    3. Choudhary, Sangita & Jain, Anshul & Biswal, Pratap Chandra, 2024. "Dynamic linkages among bitcoin, equity, gold and oil: An implied volatility perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    4. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    5. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    6. Chia-Nan Wang & Min-Chun Yu & Nguyen-Nhu-Y Ho & Thi-Nham Le, 2021. "An integrated forecasting model for the coffee bean supply chain," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(28), pages 3321-3333, June.
    7. Blasques, Francisco & van Brummelen, Janneke & Gorgi, Paolo & Koopman, Siem Jan, 2024. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Non-Stationary Location Models with Mixture of Normal Distributions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    8. Fan Yang & Xiaoying Tang & Yingxin Gan & Xindan Zhang & Jianchang Li & Xin Han & Imtiaz Ahmad, 2021. "Forecast of Freight Volume in Xi’an Based on Gray GM (1, 1) Model and Markov Forecasting Model," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-6, January.
    9. Nelson, Daniel B, 1991. "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 347-370, March.
    10. Yi-Chung Hu, 2021. "Forecasting tourism demand using fractional grey prediction models with Fourier series," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 467-491, May.
    11. Keith Pilbeam & Kjell Langeland, 2015. "Forecasting exchange rate volatility: GARCH models versus implied volatility forecasts," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 127-142, March.
    12. Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 1994. "Threshold heteroskedastic models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 931-955, September.
    13. Enrique Sentana, 1995. "Quadratic ARCH Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 62(4), pages 639-661.
    14. Li, Xiao & Wu, Ruoxi & Wang, Chen, 2024. "Impacts of bitcoin on monetary system: Is China's bitcoin ban necessary?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Dima Alberg & Haim Shalit & Rami Yosef, 2008. "Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH models," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(15), pages 1201-1208.
    16. Tauqeer Saleem & Ussama Yaqub & Salma Zaman, 2024. "Twitter sentiment analysis and bitcoin price forecasting: implications for financial risk management," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(3), pages 407-421, February.
    17. Mahboubeh Faghih Mohammadi Jalali & Hanif Heidari, 2020. "Predicting changes in Bitcoin price using grey system theory," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Wang Chia-Nan & Phan Van-Thanh, 2015. "An Improved Nonlinear Grey Bernoulli Model Combined with Fourier Series," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-7, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luc Bauwens & Sébastien Laurent & Jeroen V. K. Rombouts, 2006. "Multivariate GARCH models: a survey," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 79-109, January.
    2. Výrost, Tomáš & Baumöhl, Eduard, 2009. "Asymmetric GARCH and the financial crisis: a preliminary study," MPRA Paper 27939, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Geon Choe & Kyungsub Lee, 2014. "Conditional correlation in asset return and GARCH intensity model," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 98(3), pages 197-224, July.
    4. Krzysztof DRACHAL, 2017. "Volatility Clustering, Leverage Effects and Risk-Return Tradeoff in the Selected Stock Markets in the CEE Countries," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 37-53, September.
    5. Yu-Hua Zeng & Shou-Lei Wang & Yu-Fei Yang, 2014. "Calibration of the Volatility in Option Pricing Using the Total Variation Regularization," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, March.
    6. Su, Jung-Bin, 2014. "Empirical analysis of long memory, leverage, and distribution effects for stock market risk estimates," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-39.
    7. Lundblad, Christian, 2007. "The risk return tradeoff in the long run: 1836-2003," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 123-150, July.
    8. Giraitis, Liudas & Leipus, Remigijus & Robinson, Peter M. & Surgailis, Donatas, 2004. "LARCH, leverage, and long memory," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 294, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Geon Ho Choe & Kyungsub Lee, 2013. "Conditional correlation in asset return and GARCH intensity model," Papers 1311.4977, arXiv.org.
    10. Nagaraj Naik & Biju R. Mohan, 2021. "Stock Price Volatility Estimation Using Regime Switching Technique-Empirical Study on the Indian Stock Market," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Cook, Steven, 2006. "The impact of GARCH on asymmetric unit root tests," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 369(2), pages 745-752.
    12. Cano Berlanga, Sebastian & Giménez Gómez, José M. (José Manuel), 2016. "On Chinese stock markets: How have they evolved along time?," Working Papers 2072/267085, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    13. Roy Cerqueti & Massimiliano Giacalone & Raffaele Mattera, 2020. "Skewed non-Gaussian GARCH models for cryptocurrencies volatility modelling," Papers 2004.11674, arXiv.org.
    14. Liudas Giraitis, 2004. "LARCH, Leverage, and Long Memory," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 177-210.
    15. Muhammad Ahsanuddin & Tayyab Raza Fraz & Samreen Fatima, 2019. "Studying the Volatility of Pakistan Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange Markets in the Light of CPEC: An Application of GARCH and EGARCH Modelling," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 8(03), pages 125-132, March.
    16. Carol Alexander & Emese Lazar & Silvia Stanescu, 2010. "Analytic Moments for GARCH Processes," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2011-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading, revised Apr 2011.
    17. Shekar Bose & Hafizur Rahman, 2022. "Are News Effects Necessarily Asymmetric? Evidence from Bangladesh Stock Market," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    18. Samet Gunay & Audil Rashid Khaki, 2018. "Best Fitting Fat Tail Distribution for the Volatilities of Energy Futures: Gev, Gat and Stable Distributions in GARCH and APARCH Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    19. David McMillan & Alan Speight, 2003. "Asymmetric volatility dynamics in high frequency FTSE-100 stock index futures," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(8), pages 599-607.
    20. Nam, Kiseok & Pyun, Chong Soo & Avard, Stephen L., 2001. "Asymmetric reverting behavior of short-horizon stock returns: An evidence of stock market overreaction," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 807-824, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:5:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s43546-025-00838-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.