IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v52y2001i1d10.1023_a1012798911792.html

Citation analysis using online databases: Feasibilities and shortcomings

Author

Listed:
  • Werner Marx

    (Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research)

  • Hermann Schier

    (Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research)

  • Michael Wanitschek

    (Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research)

Abstract

Extensive citation analysis with the Science Citation Index (SCI) has become possible through expanded search capabilities introduced by STN International a few years ago. STN enhanced its retrieval language with some important features, originally developed for statistical analysis of patents. Most important are an expanded select command and several functions to list the search results. The publications to be evaluated may be selected either in the SCI, or in a number of other bibliographic databases offered by the host. With the help of these features, the basic methods to appropriately measure the impact of scientific activities are demonstrated. Furthermore, possible shortcomings as well as the risks when interpreting the results of such studies are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Werner Marx & Hermann Schier & Michael Wanitschek, 2001. "Citation analysis using online databases: Feasibilities and shortcomings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(1), pages 59-82, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:52:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1012798911792
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1012798911792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1012798911792
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1012798911792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Redner, 1998. "How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 131-134, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2003. "Informetric studies using databases: Opportunities and challenges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(3), pages 587-608, November.
    2. Marilyn H Oermann & Julia Shaw‐Kokot & George J Knafl & Jo Dowell, 2010. "Dissemination of research into clinical nursing literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3435-3442, December.
    3. Selçuk Bilir & Ersin Göğüş & Özgecan Önal & Nazlı Derya Öztürkmen & Talar Yontan, 2013. "Research performance of Turkish astronomers in the period of 1980–2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 477-489, November.
    4. Mallig, Nicolai, 2010. "A relational database for bibliometric analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 564-580.
    5. Christoph Neuhaus & Andreas Litscher & Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2007. "Using scripts to streamline citation analysis on STN International," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(1), pages 145-150, April.
    6. Guan Jiancheng & Wang Junxia, 2004. "Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(1), pages 131-155, January.
    7. Christoph Neuhaus & Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2009. "A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 219-229, February.
    8. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    9. Barbosa, Fabiana G. & Schneck, Fabiana, 2015. "Characteristics of the top-cited papers in species distribution predictive models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 77-83.
    10. Mallig, Nicolai, 2010. "A relational database for bibliometric analysis," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 22, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    11. Candan Gokceoglu & Aral I. Okay & Ebru Sezer, 2008. "International earth science literature from Turkey — 1970–2005: Trends and possible causes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 74(3), pages 409-423, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Sheridan & Yuichi Yagahara & Hidetoshi Shimodaira, 2008. "A preferential attachment model with Poisson growth for scale-free networks," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 60(4), pages 747-761, December.
    2. Fenghua Wang & Ying Fan & An Zeng & Zengru Di, 2019. "Can we predict ESI highly cited publications?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 109-125, January.
    3. Li, Wencong & Cai, Jiansheng & Wang, Jihui, 2024. "CLBA: A Coulomb’s law based algorithm for community detection in directed networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 651(C).
    4. Tang, Li & Yang, Defang & Wang, Mingxing & Guo, Ying, 2024. "The mediating impact of citation scope: Evidence from China's ESI publications," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    5. D. R. Amancio & M. G. V. Nunes & O. N. Oliveira & L. F. Costa, 2012. "Using complex networks concepts to assess approaches for citations in scientific papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 827-842, June.
    6. Montebruno, Piero & Bennett, Robert J. & van Lieshout, Carry & Smith, Harry, 2019. "A tale of two tails: Do Power Law and Lognormal models fit firm-size distributions in the mid-Victorian era?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 858-875.
    7. Jianhua Hou, 2017. "Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1437-1452, March.
    8. Perc, Matjaž, 2010. "Zipf’s law and log-normal distributions in measures of scientific output across fields and institutions: 40 years of Slovenia’s research as an example," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 358-364.
    9. Bu, Shouliang & Wang, Bing-Hong & Zhou, Tao, 2007. "Gaining scale-free and high clustering complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 374(2), pages 864-868.
    10. Ding, Waverly & Choi, Emily, 2008. "Divergent Paths or Stepping Stones: A Comparison of Scientists’ Advising and Founding Activities," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt4907j25p, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    11. He, Xuan & Zhao, Hai & Cai, Wei & Liu, Zheng & Si, Shuai-Zong, 2014. "Earthquake networks based on space–time influence domain," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 175-184.
    12. Hosseini, Seyed Soheil & Wormald, Nick & Tian, Tianhai, 2021. "A Weight-based Information Filtration Algorithm for Stock-correlation Networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    13. Yin, Yian & Wang, Dashun, 2017. "The time dimension of science: Connecting the past to the future," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 608-621.
    14. Maziar Montazerian & Edgar Dutra Zanotto & Hellmut Eckert, 2019. "A new parameter for (normalized) evaluation of H-index: countries as a case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 1065-1078, March.
    15. Martins, Francisco Leonardo Bezerra & do Nascimento, José Cláudio, 2022. "Power law dynamics in genealogical graphs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    16. Aristoklis D. Anastasiadis & Marcelo P. Albuquerque & Marcio P. Albuquerque & Diogo B. Mussi, 2010. "Tsallis q-exponential describes the distribution of scientific citations—a new characterization of the impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 205-218, April.
    17. Ding, Waverly W. & Levin, Sharon G. & Stephan, Paula E. & Winkler, Ann E., 2009. "The Impact of Information Technology on Scientists’ Productivity, Quality and Collaboration Patterns," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt80n3512q, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    18. Saxton, Gregory D. & Guo, Chao, 2020. "Social media capital: Conceptualizing the nature, acquisition, and expenditure of social media-based organizational resources," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    19. Beth Barnes & Sarah Dunn & Sean Wilkinson, 2019. "Natural hazards, disaster management and simulation: a bibliometric analysis of keyword searches," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 813-840, June.
    20. J. Martin Zyl, 2013. "The generalized Pareto distribution fitted to research outputs of countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1099-1109, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:52:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1012798911792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.