IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v313y2015icp77-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of the top-cited papers in species distribution predictive models

Author

Listed:
  • Barbosa, Fabiana G.
  • Schneck, Fabiana

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of the most cited papers regarding species distribution predictive models (SDPMs). We found 173 papers on SDPMs that received at least 100 citations until 2013, according to the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database. These papers were published between 1991 and 2012, with the majority published between 2002 and 2012, indicating the rapid development of this field of research. The papers were published mainly in journals listed in the ecology category on the Web of Science. Almost half of the top-cited papers were methodological, introducing novel modeling methods and software. Applied papers on species conservation and biodiversity management, climate change, phylogeography, and biosecurity also figured out among the top-cited papers. Researchers from 174 institutions in 27 countries, with 51% of the papers being internationally collaborative and 69% inter-institutionally collaborative, published the papers. Among all 173 papers, seven papers stood out as having a great impact on the field, receiving more than 1000 citations each. Finally, the results found by analyzing the top-cited SDPMs papers support the view of a growing interest and rapid development of this research field over the past two decades. The top-cited papers primarily focused on the development and evaluation of novel methods to improve the performance of the models, and thus, to better predict the environmental suitability for species in applied studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbosa, Fabiana G. & Schneck, Fabiana, 2015. "Characteristics of the top-cited papers in species distribution predictive models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 77-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:313:y:2015:i:c:p:77-83
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001500263X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2009. "Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(2), pages 419-439, August.
    2. Kun-Yang Chuang & Ming-Huang Wang & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2011. "High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 551-562, June.
    3. Werner Marx & Hermann Schier & Michael Wanitschek, 2001. "Citation analysis using online databases: Feasibilities and shortcomings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(1), pages 59-82, September.
    4. David A. King, 2004. "The scientific impact of nations," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6997), pages 311-316, July.
    5. Hao Qiu & Yi-Feng Chen, 2009. "Bibliometric analysis of biological invasions research during the period of 1991 to 2007," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(3), pages 601-610, December.
    6. David Adam, 2002. "The counting house," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6873), pages 726-729, February.
    7. John N. Parker & Christopher Lortie & Stefano Allesina, 2010. "Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 129-143, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Youssef Elomari & Masoud Norouzi & Marc Marín-Genescà & Alberto Fernández & Dieter Boer, 2022. "Integration of Solar Photovoltaic Systems into Power Networks: A Scientific Evolution Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Xinmin Zhang & Ronald C Estoque & Hualin Xie & Yuji Murayama & Manjula Ranagalage, 2019. "Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Huyen, Nguyen Thanh Thanh & Ho, Manh-Toan & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2020. "Western ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research: Evidence from highly cited publications," OSF Preprints sk3e6, Center for Open Science.
    5. Citores, L. & Ibaibarriaga, L. & Lee, D.-J. & Brewer, M.J. & Santos, M. & Chust, G., 2020. "Modelling species presence–absence in the ecological niche theory framework using shape-constrained generalized additive models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    6. Rodrigues, Lucas dos Santos & Daudt, Nicholas Winterle & Cardoso, Luis Gustavo & Kinas, Paul Gerhard & Conesa, David & Pennino, Maria Grazia, 2023. "Species distribution modelling in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean: A systematic review and trends," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    2. Jochen Krauss, 2007. "Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 79-89, October.
    3. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Science and scientific collaboration in South Africa: apartheid and after," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 373-390, August.
    4. Chen, Huaqi & Ho, Yuh-Shan, 2015. "Highly cited articles in biomass research: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 12-20.
    5. Guan Jiancheng & Wang Junxia, 2004. "Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(1), pages 131-155, January.
    6. Vieira, E.S. & Gomes, J.A.N.F., 2010. "Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13.
    7. Xiaoyun Sui & Yongxia Chen & Zhi Lu & Yifeng Chen, 2015. "A bibliometric analysis of research papers related to the Mekong River," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 419-434, October.
    8. Juan Tao & Rongxiao Che & Dekui He & Yunzhi Yan & Xiaoyun Sui & Yifeng Chen, 2015. "Trends and potential cautions in food web research from a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 435-447, October.
    9. Heidi Prozesky & Nelius Boshoff, 2012. "Bibliometrics as a tool for measuring gender-specific research performance: an example from South African invasion ecology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 383-406, February.
    10. Almeida, J.A.S. & Pais, A.A.C.C. & Formosinho, S.J., 2009. "Science indicators and science patterns in Europe," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 134-142.
    11. Mingyang Wang & Shi Li & Guangsheng Chen, 2017. "Detecting latent referential articles based on their vitality performance in the latest 2 years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1557-1571, September.
    12. Christopher J. Lortie, 2010. "Letter to the Editor: A global comment on scientific publications, productivity, people, and beer," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 539-541, August.
    13. I. Jarić & J. Gessner, 2012. "Analysis of publications on sturgeon research between 1996 and 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 715-735, February.
    14. Antonio Fernandez-Cano & Inés M. Fernández-Guerrero, 2017. "A multivariate model for evaluating emergency medicine journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 991-1003, February.
    15. Lakshmi Balachandran Nair & Michael Gibbert, 2016. "What makes a ‘good’ title and (how) does it matter for citations? A review and general model of article title attributes in management science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(3), pages 1331-1359, June.
    16. Goodall, Amanda H., 2009. "Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1079-1092, September.
    17. Domingo Docampo & Lawrence Cram, 2019. "Highly cited researchers: a moving target," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 1011-1025, March.
    18. Amanda H Goodall, 2005. "Should Research Universities be Led by Top Researchers? Part 1: Are they?," HEW 0506003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge & Felix Moya-Anegón, 2010. "Challenges in the study of Cuban scientific output," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(3), pages 723-737, June.
    20. Pentti Riikonen & Mauno Vihinen, 2008. "National research contributions: A case study on Finnish biomedical research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(2), pages 207-222, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:313:y:2015:i:c:p:77-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.