IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i1d10.1007_s11192-024-05178-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of subject-normalized comprehensiveness of research-intensive universities

Author

Listed:
  • Saulo Mendes

    (University of Geneva
    Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

Abstract

Evaluation of university league tables is a controversial topic in higher education studies and metrics of scientific evaluation. Since its appearance on an international scale two decades ago, significant criticism of their methodologies has been accumulating without being addressed. One important bias regards the unequal distribution of research output and impact across different subjects, which in turn favors institutions that have the strongest performance in medical and physical sciences. The university league tables are revisited by normalizing each field to create a uniform distribution of value. Then, the overall performance of an institution is interpreted as the probability of having a high score in any given academic field while not inducing a zero-sum game. The present assessment shows that the main difference between hundreds of leading research universities is whether their coverage of all areas of human knowledge is comprehensive or specialized, whereas their mean performance per subject is nearly indistinguishable.

Suggested Citation

  • Saulo Mendes, 2025. "Assessment of subject-normalized comprehensiveness of research-intensive universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(1), pages 109-131, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05178-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05178-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05178-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-05178-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05178-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.