IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v19y2014i1d10.1007_s11142-013-9256-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disaggregating operating and financial activities: implications for forecasts of profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Esplin

    (University of Alberta)

  • Max Hewitt

    (Indiana University)

  • Marlene Plumlee

    (University of Utah)

  • Teri Lombardi Yohn

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

Researchers, practitioners, and standard setters emphasize the importance of disaggregating financial statements into operating and financial activities. However, there is a lack of research demonstrating that this disaggregation improves forecasts of profitability. In this study, we consider whether and when the operating/financial disaggregation improves forecasts of profitability. Contrary to the use of an aggregate forecasting approach by most related prior research, we first show that the operating/financial disaggregation only provides forecast improvement over a benchmark model incorporating aggregate information when the components forecasting approach is used. We also compare the operating/financial disaggregation to the unusual/infrequent disaggregation required by US GAAP. We find that the operating/financial disaggregation yields less accurate forecasts than the unusual/infrequent disaggregation. However, when using the components forecasting approach, we find that the combination of both disaggregations improves forecasts of profitability. Finally, we document that the incremental usefulness of the operating/financial disaggregation relative to a benchmark model incorporating aggregate information is a function of growth and accounting conservatism. Overall, our study provides timely evidence concerning how analysts and investors might best use the operating/financial disaggregation for forecasting profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Esplin & Max Hewitt & Marlene Plumlee & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2014. "Disaggregating operating and financial activities: implications for forecasts of profitability," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 328-362, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:19:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-013-9256-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-013-9256-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-013-9256-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-013-9256-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore E. Christensen & Kenneth J. Merkley & Jennifer Wu Tucker & Shankar Venkataraman, 2011. "Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-527, September.
    2. Madhav V. Rajan & Stefan Reichelstein & Mark T. Soliman, 2007. "Conservatism, growth, and return on investment," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 325-370, September.
    3. Hendry, David F. & Hubrich, Kirstin, 2011. "Combining Disaggregate Forecasts or Combining Disaggregate Information to Forecast an Aggregate," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 29(2), pages 216-227.
    4. Eli Amir & Itay Kama & Joshua Livnat, 2011. "Conditional versus unconditional persistence of RNOA components: implications for valuation," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 302-327, June.
    5. Fama, Eugene F & MacBeth, James D, 1973. "Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 607-636, May-June.
    6. Patricia M. Dechow & Weili Ge, 2006. "The persistence of earnings and cash flows and the role of special items: Implications for the accrual anomaly," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 253-296, September.
    7. Madhav V. Rajan & Stefan Reichelstein & Mark T. Soliman, 2007. "Conservatism, growth, and return on investment," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 323-323, September.
    8. Jeffrey L. Callen & Dan Segal, 2005. "Empirical Tests of the Feltham–Ohlson (1995) Model," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 409-429, December.
    9. Doron Nissim & Stephen H. Penman, 2001. "Ratio Analysis and Equity Valuation: From Research to Practice," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 109-154, March.
    10. Doron Nissim & Stephen H. Penman, 2003. "Financial Statement Analysis of Leverage and How It Informs About Profitability and Price-to-Book Ratios," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 531-560, December.
    11. Patricia M. Fairfield & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2001. "Using Asset Turnover and Profit Margin to Forecast Changes in Profitability," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 371-385, December.
    12. Mark T. Bradshaw & Richard G. Sloan, 2002. "GAAP versus The Street: An Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 41-66, March.
    13. Patricia M. Fairfield & Sundaresh Ramnath & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2009. "Do Industry‐Level Analyses Improve Forecasts of Financial Performance?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(1), pages 147-178, March.
    14. Patricia M. Fairfield & Scott Whisenant & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2003. "The Differential Persistence of Accruals and Cash Flows for Future Operating Income versus Future Profitability," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 221-243, June.
    15. Patricia M. Fairfield & Karen A. Kitching & Vicki Wei Tang, 2009. "Are special items informative about future profit margins?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 204-236, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asher Curtis & Melissa F. Lewis-Western & Sara Toynbee, 2015. "Historical cost measurement and the use of DuPont analysis by market participants," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1210-1245, September.
    2. Eli Amir & Itay Kama & Joshua Livnat, 2011. "Conditional versus unconditional persistence of RNOA components: implications for valuation," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 302-327, June.
    3. Paul Healy & George Serafeim & Suraj Srinivasan & Gwen Yu, 2014. "Market competition, earnings management, and persistence in accounting profitability around the world," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1281-1308, December.
    4. Nerissa C. Brown & Theodore E. Christensen, 2014. "The quality of street cash flow from operations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 913-954, June.
    5. Alexander P. Paton & Damien Cannavan & Stephen Gray & Khoa Hoang, 2020. "Analyst versus model‐based earnings forecasts: implied cost of capital applications," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 4061-4092, December.
    6. Sudhakar Balachandran & Partha Mohanram, 2012. "Using residual income to refine the relationship between earnings growth and stock returns," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 134-165, March.
    7. Theodore E. Christensen & Kenneth J. Merkley & Jennifer Wu Tucker & Shankar Venkataraman, 2011. "Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-527, September.
    8. Wang, Weimin & (Frank) Wang, Xu, 2014. "Predicting earnings in a poor information environment," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 46-58.
    9. Richard G. Sloan & Annika Yu Wang, 2025. "Predictable EPS growth and the performance of value investing," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 33-78, March.
    10. Matthew Kubic, 2025. "The benefits of article 11 pro forma disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2768-2821, September.
    11. Patricia M. Fairfield & Karen A. Kitching & Vicki Wei Tang, 2009. "Are special items informative about future profit margins?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 204-236, September.
    12. Sami Keskek & James N. Myers & Linda A. Myers, 2020. "Investors' Misweighting of Firm‐Level Information and the Market's Expectations of Earnings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1828-1853, September.
    13. Stephen H. Penman & Nir Yehuda, 2009. "The pricing of earnings and cash flows and an affirmation of accrual accounting," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 453-479, December.
    14. Gu, Zhaoyang & Xue, Jian, 2008. "The superiority and disciplining role of independent analysts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 289-316, August.
    15. Maria Correia & Scott Richardson & İrem Tuna, 2012. "Value investing in credit markets," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 572-609, September.
    16. Dmitri Byzalov & Sudipta Basu, 2016. "Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 859-897, September.
    17. Frank Heflin & Charles Hsu & Qinglu Jin, 2015. "Accounting conservatism and Street earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 674-709, June.
    18. Visani, Franco & Di Lascio, F. Marta L. & Gardini, Silvia, 2020. "The impact of institutional and cultural factors on the use of non-GAAP financial measures. International evidence from the oil and gas industry," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    19. Peng-Chia Chiu & Timothy D. Haight, 2020. "Investor learning, earnings signals, and stock returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 671-698, February.
    20. Masako Darrough & Jianming Ye, 2007. "Valuation of loss firms in a knowledge-based economy," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 61-93, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:19:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-013-9256-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.