IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i4d10.1007_s11135-025-02111-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implicit discriminatory attitudes in surveys: validation of the semantic affect misattribution procedure for dealing with social desirability in surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Henrik Kenneth Andersen

    (Chemnitz University of Technology)

  • Jochen Mayerl

    (Chemnitz University of Technology)

  • Elmar Schlüter

    (Justus Liebig University Giessen)

Abstract

We examine the use of the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) for assessing implicit or latent attitudes in the context of general population surveys. Specifically, we test and validate a Semantic AMP (SAMP) which uses words as primes rather than images. We suggest that the SAMP could be incorporated into the repertoire of experimental methods to be used in broad omnibus surveys to deal with social desirability bias. We discuss findings of an empirical investigation with regard to the procedure’s validity and reliability, as well as in comparison with direct questions about potentially sensitive attitudes. The procedure shows promise: confirmatory factor analyses using structural equation models suggest satisfactory construct validity and acceptable measurement invariance for subsamples in terms of age, gender and education. Further, the implicit measures generally correlate with explicit measures of discriminatory attitudes. Correlations between implicit and explicit measures are, as expected, weak to moderate in magnitude, suggesting some amount of discrepancy, potentially due to social desirability. The procedure is also relatively easy to implement in online surveys. But we also find some signs of satisficing behaviour amongst respondents, suggesting the procedure may be overwhelming to some.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrik Kenneth Andersen & Jochen Mayerl & Elmar Schlüter, 2025. "Implicit discriminatory attitudes in surveys: validation of the semantic affect misattribution procedure for dealing with social desirability in surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3159-3185, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02111-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02111-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02111-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02111-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02111-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.