IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i2d10.1007_s11135-024-02022-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey

Author

Listed:
  • Maiss Ahmad

    (University of Sharjah)

  • Stephen Wilkins

    (The British University in Dubai, Dubai International Academic City)

Abstract

Purposive sampling (PS) is one of the most commonly used approaches in qualitative research across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Despite its popularity, there is still no research-based framework for conducting, teaching and evaluating PS applications. In this study, we articulate a framework developed from insights collected from thirteen professors and senior research experts at leading universities and research centers worldwide, across eight distinct social science disciplines in the fields of education, business and health policy. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and then analyzed using the codebook thematic analysis technique. The proposed PS framework embraces the flexibility, inductive and coherence principles of qualitative inquiry. It provides an application guide for novice researchers and postgraduate students, and an appraisal tool for academics, principal investigators and journal reviewers. Additionally, the results highlight the important role of supervisors and principal investigators in the entire research process.

Suggested Citation

  • Maiss Ahmad & Stephen Wilkins, 2025. "Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1461-1479, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02022-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire Wagner & Barbara Kawulich & Mark Garner, 2019. "A Mixed Research Synthesis of Literature on Teaching Qualitative Research Methods," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    2. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    3. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Sardar Hussain & Sohaib Ahmad & Mariyam Saleem & Sohail Akhtar, 2020. "Finite population distribution function estimation with dual use of auxiliary information under simple and stratified random sampling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-30, September.
    5. Vibha Kaushik & Christine A. Walsh, 2019. "Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nura Abdel-Rahman & Orly Manor & Liora Valinsky & Ofri Mosenzon & Ronit Calderon-Margalit & Sveta Roberman, 2022. "What is important for people with type 2 diabetes? A focus group study to identify relevant aspects for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in diabetes care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Izudi, Jonathan & Cattamanchi, Adithya & Castelnuovo, Barbara & King, Rachel, 2024. "Barriers and facilitators to viral load suppression among people living with HIV following intensive adherence counseling in Kampala, Uganda: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    3. Kelvin Mwita, 2022. "Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 414-420, June.
    4. Sanvir Sandhu & Emma Wilson & Kaushik Chattopadhyay, 2023. "Perceptions and Experiences of Undergraduate Students Regarding Social Media as a Tool for Government COVID-19-Related Messages: A Qualitative Study in Nottingham, UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Malik, Sushant & Kajale, Dilip, 2024. "Empowering Small and Marginal Farmers: Unveiling the Potential and Addressing Obstacles of Farmer Producer Organizations in India," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(01), March.
    6. Wendy Anzules-Falcones & Juan Ignacio Martin-Castilla & Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto & Diana Caamana-Gomez, 2024. "Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism: Reciprocal Influence of the Environment and Personal Factors on Business Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Priska S. Schneider & Michelle Pantis & Christine Preiser & Daniela Hagmann & Gottfried M. Barth & Tobias J. Renner & Katharina Allgaier, 2024. "SARS-CoV-2 and Adolescent Psychiatric Emergencies at the Tübingen University Hospital: Analyzing Trends, Diagnoses, and Contributing Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Daniela Stelzmann & Sara Jahnke & Laura F. Kuhle, 2022. "Media Coverage of Pedophilia and Its Impact on Help-Seeking Persons with Pedophilia in Germany—A Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Stefano De Paoli & Walter S. Mathis, 2025. "Reflections on inductive thematic saturation as a potential metric for measuring the validity of an inductive thematic analysis with LLMs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 683-709, February.
    10. Habib, Muhammad Danish & Attri, Rekha & Salam, Mohammad Asif & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2025. "Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Gülüm Özer & İdil Işık & Jordi Escartín, 2024. "Is There Somebody Looking out for Me? A Qualitative Analysis of Bullying Experiences of Individuals Diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Najwa Taghy & Linda Cambon & Caroline Boulliat & Olivier Aromatario & Claude Dussart, 2021. "Exploring the Determinants of Polypharmacy Prescribing and Dispensing Behaviours in Primary Care for the Elderly—Protocol for a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
    14. Van Droogenbroeck, Ellen & Van Hove, Leo, 2020. "Intra-household task allocation in online grocery shopping: Together alone," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    15. Thuy Séran & Anne-Sophie Fernandez & Hervé Chappert, 2024. "Managing coopetition in multi-unit organizations: a management-control perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 2889-2924, October.
    16. Abby Haynes & Kirsten Howard & Liam Johnson & Gavin Williams & Kelly Clanchy & Sean Tweedy & Adam Scheinberg & Sakina Chagpar & Belinda Wang & Gabrielle Vassallo & Rhys Ashpole & Catherine Sherrington, 2023. "Physical Activity Preferences of People Living with Brain Injury: Formative Qualitative Research to Develop a Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(4), pages 385-398, July.
    17. Karina Soubra & Camilla Tamworth & Zeast Kamal & Clare Brook & Dawn Langdon & Jo Billings, 2023. "Health and social care workers experiences of coping while working in the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic: One year on," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-27, April.
    18. Şahika Simsek-Cetinkaya & Simge Evrenol Ocal, 2023. "“Psychological Injuries Are Not Visible†: Experiences and Perceptions of Midwives and Nurses about Domestic Violence during Pregnancy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(8), pages 1115-1123, November.
    19. Júlio Belo Fernandes & Diana Vareta & Sónia Fernandes & Ana Silva Almeida & Dina Peças & Noélia Ferreira & Liliana Roldão, 2022. "Rehabilitation Workforce Challenges to Implement Person-Centered Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    20. Chikako Ishizuka & Kei Aoki, 2024. "Drivers of sustained brand engagement: cases of long-term customers of hedonic and utilitarian brands in Japan," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 979-989, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02022-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.