IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v48y2014i5p2523-2535.html

Methods for analyzing decision-making: a framework approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Nyhlén
  • Gustav Lidén

Abstract

In political science an eternal question concerns how decisions and policies arise. Modern society, characterized by more uncertainty and complexity than before, increases the challenge of providing valid answers. However, the general lack of methodological concern in several previous studies in this area stresses the need for elaborations of more suitable approaches. In this article we add a methodological perspective that deals with this very question. By reviewing and analyzing earlier research on how decision-making is reached, the overall ambition of this article is to create a framework that can lay the methodological foundation for further studies. Such a framework, which takes into account both the complexity of modern multi-governance societies and adds methodological perspectives of macro and micro standpoints as well as of causal mechanisms, can be used in future research to achieve richer pictures of how decision-making is carried out. In addition, we show how a certain technique of analysis is highly compatible to this framework and that jointly these features provide solutions for a better understanding of the complexity of modern decision-making. All in all, applying this strategy can be used to better systematize complex causal chains that reflect different analytical levels and thereby increase leverage on how to understand and explain the process of political decisions. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Nyhlén & Gustav Lidén, 2014. "Methods for analyzing decision-making: a framework approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2523-2535, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:5:p:2523-2535
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9905-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9905-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-013-9905-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lundqvist, Lennart J., 1988. "Privatization: Towards a Concept for Comparative Policy Analysis," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Erik-Hans Klijn, 2008. "Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What's New?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 299-317, May.
    3. Beck, Nathaniel, 2010. "Causal Process “Observation”: Oxymoron or (Fine) Old Wine," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 499-505.
    4. Geert R. Teisman & Erik-Hans Klijn, 2008. "Complexity Theory and Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 287-297, May.
    5. Collier, David & Brady, Henry E. & Seawright, Jason, 2010. "Outdated Views of Qualitative Methods: Time to Move On," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 506-513.
    6. Piet Verschuren & Bas Arts, 2005. "Quantifying influence in complex decision making by means of paired comparisons," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 495-516, January.
    7. Gerring, John, 2008. "The Mechanismic Worldview: Thinking Inside the Box," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 161-179, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evert Waeterloos, 2021. "Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2022. "The Value of Systems Thinking for and in Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    3. Yi Yang, 2021. "Critical realism and complexity theory: Building a nonconstructivist systems research framework for effective governance analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 177-183, January.
    4. G. Biesbroek & Catrien Termeer & Judith Klostermann & Pavel Kabat, 2014. "Analytical lenses on barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(7), pages 1011-1032, October.
    5. Parker Hevron, 2018. "Judicialization and Its Effects: Experiments as a Way Forward," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Wertheim-Heck, Sigrid C.O. & Vellema, Sietze & Spaargaren, Gert, 2015. "Food safety and urban food markets in Vietnam: The need for flexible and customized retail modernization policies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 95-106.
    7. Alejandro Avenburg & John Gerring & Jason Seawright, 2023. "How do social scientists reach causal inferences? A study of reception," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 257-275, February.
    8. Bill Roungas & Femke Bekius & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2019. "The Game Between Game Theory and Gaming Simulations: Design Choices," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(2), pages 180-201, April.
    9. Peter Davis & Bob Baulch, 2010. "Casting the net wide and deep: lessons learned in a mixed-methods study of poverty dynamics in rural Bangladesh," Working Papers id:2674, eSocialSciences.
    10. repec:osf:osfxxx:2s8w5_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Richard A. Nielsen, 2016. "Case Selection via Matching," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(3), pages 569-597, August.
    12. Bekius, Femke & Meijer, Sebastiaan & de Bruijn, Hans, 2018. "Collaboration patterns in the Dutch railway sector: Using game concepts to compare different outcomes in a unique development case," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 360-368.
    13. Simone Busetti, 2023. "Causality is good for practice: policy design and reverse engineering," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 419-438, June.
    14. Oliver Bakewell, 2013. "Re-launching migration systems," Norface Discussion Paper Series 2013011, Norface Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.
    15. Robbert Biesbroek & Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2020. "Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in the Netherlands," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(1), pages 61-84, March.
    16. Oliver Bakewell & Hein de Haas & Agnieszka Kubal, 2011. "Migration systems, pioneers and the role of agency," Norface Discussion Paper Series 2011023, Norface Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.
    17. A. Asquer, 2014. "Explaining Partial Privatization Of Public Service Provision: The Emergence Of Mixed Ownership Water Firms In Italy (1994–2009)," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 11-30, March.
    18. Lesch, Matthew & McCambridge, Jim, 2021. "Waiting for the wave: Political leadership, policy windows, and alcohol policy change in Ireland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    19. Maxime Stauffer & Isaak Mengesha & Konrad Seifert & Igor Krawczuk & Jens Fischer & Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo, 2022. "A Computational Turn in Policy Process Studies: Coevolving Network Dynamics of Policy Change," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    20. Heather Millar, 2020. "Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 765-796, November.
    21. Charles Conteh, 2013. "Changing Trends in Regional Economic Development Policy Governance: The Case of Northern Ontario, Canada," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1419-1437, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:5:p:2523-2535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.