IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v46y2012i2p501-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computer-assisted analysis of public discourse: a case study of the precautionary principle in the US and UK press

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei Kirilenko

    ()

  • Svetlana Stepchenkova
  • Rebecca Romsdahl
  • Kristine Mattis

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei Kirilenko & Svetlana Stepchenkova & Rebecca Romsdahl & Kristine Mattis, 2012. "Computer-assisted analysis of public discourse: a case study of the precautionary principle in the US and UK press," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 501-522, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:46:y:2012:i:2:p:501-522
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-010-9383-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-010-9383-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl Roberts, 2000. "A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 259-274, August.
    2. Harry Van Den Berg & Kees Van Der Veer, 2000. "Computerized Decision Support Systems and Text Analysis: Evaluating CETA," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 65-86, February.
    3. George Muskens, 1985. "Mathematical analysis of content," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 99-103, January.
    4. Melina Alexa & Cornelia Zuell, 2000. "Text Analysis Software: Commonalities, Differences and Limitations: The Results of a Review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 299-321, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:46:y:2012:i:2:p:501-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.