IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12395-d687820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Comprehensive Strategy for the Management of Rare Diseases in Slovenia: Outlining an IT-Enabled Ecosystemic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dalibor Stanimirovic

    (National Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Eva Murko

    (National Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Tadej Battelino

    (Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children’s Hospital Ljubljana, Bohoriceva ulica 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Urh Groselj

    (Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children’s Hospital Ljubljana, Bohoriceva ulica 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Mojca Zerjav Tansek

    (Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children’s Hospital Ljubljana, Bohoriceva ulica 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Rare diseases (RDs), with distinctive and complex features, pose a serious public health concern and represent a considerable challenge for the Slovenian healthcare system. One of the potential approaches to tackling this problem and treating patients with RDs in a quality and effective manner is to form an RD ecosystem. This represents a functional environment that integrates all stakeholders, procedures, and relationships required for the coordinated and effective treatment of patients. This paper explores the current situation in the field of RDs, especially in light of the proposed ecosystemic arrangement, and provides an outline for the design of an RD ecosystem in Slovenia. The research applies a case-study design, where focus groups are used to collect evidence from the field, assess the state of affairs, and generate ideas. Structured focus group discussions were conducted with preeminent experts affiliated with the leading institutions in the field of RDs in Slovenia. Analyses and interpretations of the obtained data were carried out by means of conventional content analysis. Setting up an RD ecosystem in Slovenia would lead to significant benefits for patients, as it could promote the coordination of healthcare treatment and facilitate extensive monitoring of the treatment parameters and outcomes. A well-organized RD ecosystem could garner considerable systemic benefits for evidence-informed policymaking, a better utilization of resources, and technological innovation. Delivering quality healthcare in this complex field is largely reliant on the effective integration and collaboration of all entities within the RD ecosystem, the alignment of related systemic factors, and the direction of healthcare services to support the needs and well-being of patients with RDs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalibor Stanimirovic & Eva Murko & Tadej Battelino & Urh Groselj & Mojca Zerjav Tansek, 2021. "Towards a Comprehensive Strategy for the Management of Rare Diseases in Slovenia: Outlining an IT-Enabled Ecosystemic Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12395-:d:687820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalibor Stanimirovic, 2015. "A Framework for Information and Communication Technology Induced Transformation of the Healthcare Business Model in Slovenia," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 29-47, January.
    2. Carl Roberts, 2000. "A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 259-274, August.
    3. Sklyar, Alexey & Kowalkowski, Christian & Tronvoll, Bård & Sörhammar, David, 2019. "Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 450-460.
    4. Yllka Kodra & Marianna Cavazza & Marta de Santis & Andrea Guala & Maria-Elena Liverani & Patrizio Armeni & Maura Masini & Domenica Taruscio, 2020. "Social Economic Costs, Health-Related Quality of Life and Disability in Patients with Cri Du Chat Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Yllka Kodra & Jérôme Weinbach & Manuel Posada-de-la-Paz & Alessio Coi & S. Lydie Lemonnier & David Van Enckevort & Marco Roos & Annika Jacobsen & Ronald Cornet & S. Faisal Ahmed & Virginie Bros-Facer , 2018. "Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Rare Disease Registries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salma R. Ali & Jillian Bryce & Li En Tan & Olaf Hiort & Alberto M. Pereira & Erica L. T. van den Akker & Natasha M. Appelman-Dijkstra & Jerome Bertherat & Martine Cools & Olaf M. Dekkers & Yllka Kodra, 2020. "The EuRRECa Project as a Model for Data Access and Governance Policies for Rare Disease Registries That Collect Clinical Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Patel, Pankaj C. & Gebauer, Heiko, 2020. "The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Jonas Wirth & Mirko Schneider & Leon Hanselmann & Kira Fink & Stephan Nebauer & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2024. "An Exploratory Analysis of the Current Status and Potential of Service-Oriented and Data-Driven Business Models within the Sheet Metal Working Sector: Insights from Interview-Based Research in Small a," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2021. "Small-medium enterprises and innovative startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems: exploring an under-remarked relation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1843-1866, December.
    8. Thomson, Linus & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Jovanovic, Marin, 2023. "Conceptualizing business model piloting: An experiential learning process for autonomous solutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Yunis, Manal & Tarhini, Abbas & Kassar, Abdulnasser, 2018. "The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 344-356.
    10. Jifei Xie & Lulu Ma & Jiamin Li, 2023. "Servitization, Digitalization or Hand in Hand: A Study on the Sustainable Development Path of Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Linus Thomson & Anmar Kamalaldin & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2022. "A maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms: The interplay of technology, ecosystem, and business model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 125-152, March.
    12. Shen, Lei & Sun, Wanqin & Parida, Vinit, 2023. "Consolidating digital servitization research: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Ocelík, Petr & Osička, Jan & Zapletalová, Veronika & Černoch, Filip & Dančák, Břetislav, 2017. "Local opposition and acceptance of a deep geological repository of radioactive waste in the Czech Republic: A frame analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 458-466.
    14. Hongjun Cao & Yuxin Fang & Jihui Sun, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Institutional Support on the Servitization Transformation Performance of Manufacturing Firms—Based on a Dual Mediation Model of Business Model Innovation and Technological Inn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Filosa Gita Sukmono & Fajar Junaed & Qholiva Yuni Fadilla & Mohammad Jafar Loilatu & Dani Fadillah, 2023. "News about the Sunda Strait Tsunami Disaster: From the Selection of News Sources to the Production Process," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 10-18, June.
    17. Yuki Inoue & Takeshi Takenaka & Takami Kasasaku & Tadafumi Tamegai & Ryohei Arai, 2023. "How to design platform ecosystems by intrapreneurs: Implications from action design research on IoT-based platform," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Mosch, Philipp & Schweikl, Stefan & Obermaier, Robert, 2021. "Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    19. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 478-491.
    20. Anton Oleinik, 2011. "Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: triangulation at work," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 859-873, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12395-:d:687820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.