IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v45y2011i3p525-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The classical myth of Ulysses versus Palamedes: an early metaphor for the qualitative/quantitative debate?

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Fernández-Cano

    ()

  • Inés Fernández-Guerrero

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Fernández-Cano & Inés Fernández-Guerrero, 2011. "The classical myth of Ulysses versus Palamedes: an early metaphor for the qualitative/quantitative debate?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 525-538, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:45:y:2011:i:3:p:525-538
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-010-9310-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-010-9310-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Hanson, 2008. "Wither Qualitative/Quantitative?: Grounds for Methodological Convergence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 97-111, February.
    2. Adri Smaling, 2000. "What Kind of Dialogue Should Paradigm-Dialogues Be?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 51-63, February.
    3. Joanna Sale & Lynne Lohfeld & Kevin Brazil, 2002. "Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 43-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:45:y:2011:i:3:p:525-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.