IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v38y2020i2d10.1007_s40273-019-00877-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Talkin’ About a Resolution: Issues in the Push for Greater Transparency of Medicine Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Brendan Shaw

    () (University of New South Wales
    Shawview Consulting)

  • Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz

    (Independent Economics Consultant
    Universidad Carlos III)

Abstract

Abstract At the 2019 World Health Assembly, a significant new resolution was agreed by most countries to start publicly sharing information on the real net prices they pay for medicines in their health systems. The resolution also includes provisions for countries to support other transparency activities. However, an additional proposal to require pharmaceutical companies to submit information on their internal sales figures, internal research and development costs, clinical trial costs and marketing costs for each individual medicine as a condition of registration, and for governments to publish this, was not agreed. Pressure for coordinated international action to increase the transparency of medicine prices and costs has been building for some time, as confidential discounts and rebates on prices of medicines are common. We argue that while it is possible that stakeholders may benefit to some extent from greater transparency on prices, several important policy and economic issues need to be carefully considered. Such transparency, combined with widespread use of international reference pricing, might undermine companies’ differential pricing strategies, which are important in fostering wider access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries in particular, noting that access to medicines issues can occur in high-income countries as well. Moreover, there is a further risk that these types of proposals will lead to price fixing, less competition and higher prices than might otherwise be the case. The lack of any commitments in the resolution to greater transparency in payer decision-making processes also risks undermining the credibility of the resolution. The resolution and further transparency measures could have the potential to undermine patient access to medicines in the developing world, lead to higher prices in some markets and compromise long-term development of new medicines for future generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Brendan Shaw & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz, 2020. "Talkin’ About a Resolution: Issues in the Push for Greater Transparency of Medicine Prices," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 125-134, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s40273-019-00877-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00877-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-019-00877-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berdud, M. & Chalkidou, K. & Dean, E. & Ferraro, J. & Garrison, L. & Nemzoff, C. & Towse, A., 2019. "The Future of Global Health Procurement: Issues around Pricing Transparency," Research Papers 002150, Office of Health Economics.
    2. Leopold, Christine & Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje Katja & Vogler, Sabine & de Joncheere, Kees & Laing, Richard Ogilvie & Leufkens, Hubert G.M., 2013. "Is Europe still heading to a common price level for on-patent medicines? An exploratory study among 15 Western European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 209-216.
    3. Mikel Berdud & Kalipso Chalkidou & Emma Dean & Jimena Ferraro & Lou Garrison & Cassandra Nemzoff & Adrian Towse, 2019. "The Future of Global Health Procurement: Issues around Pricing Transparency," Working Papers 507, Center for Global Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Jacoline Bouvy’s journal round-up for 2nd March 2020
      by Jacoline Bouvy in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-03-02 12:00:00

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s40273-019-00877-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.