IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v36y2018i11d10.1007_s40273-018-0690-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Hobbins

    (Queens University Belfast)

  • Luke Barry

    (NUI Galway)

  • Dan Kelleher

    (NUI Galway)

  • Koonal Shah

    (Office of Health Economics)

  • Nancy Devlin

    (Office of Health Economics)

  • Juan Manuel Ramos Goni

    (EuroQol Research Foundation)

  • Ciaran O’Neill

    (Queens University Belfast)

Abstract

Objective Our objective was to develop a value set based on Irish utility values for the EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level instrument (EQ-5D-5L). Methods The research design and data collection followed a protocol developed by the EuroQol Group. The EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) software was administered using computer-assisted personal interviews to a representative sample of adults resident in Ireland between 2015 and 2016. Utility values were elicited using two stated-preference techniques: time trade-off (TTO) and discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Each respondent completed a valuation exercise in which the EQ-VT system randomly selected one block of ten TTO questions from ten blocks relating to a possible 86 health states. One block of seven DCE pairs from 28 blocks of a possible 196 pairs of health states were randomly selected to accompany this. The relationship between utility values and health states was analysed using a hybrid regression model that combined data from the TTO and DCE techniques and expressed these as a function of the health state presented to the individual. This model estimated coefficients for 20 dummy variables that characterised each health state in the EQ-5D-5L framework, with the lowest level of severity providing the reference category in each domain. The relationship between weighted and unweighted TTO and DCE analyses of main effects was analysed separately. Results Comparison of weighted and unweighted models revealed no substantive differences in results with respect to either DCE or TTO models. The unweighted hybrid model produced estimated effects, the ordering of which was intuitively consistent within each domain: lower levels of health were associated with lower utility values. Differences were evident between domains with respect to valuations; the disutility associated with conditions related to anxiety/depression and pain/discomfort was higher than for other domains. The decrement in utility associated with movement from the highest to the lowest level of health was 0.344 for mobility, 0.287 for self-care, 0.187 for usual activities, 0.510 for pain/discomfort and 0.646 for anxiety/depression. Discussion The results present the first value set based on the EQ-5D-5L framework for a representative sample of residents in Ireland. The set reveals a higher decrement in utility associated with anxiety/depression than with other domains of health. Caution is warranted in comparisons with other value sets. That said, those in England, the Netherlands, Uruguay and China reveal that, whereas Irish values are broadly consistent with respect to mobility, self-care and usual activities, residents of Ireland attach a higher decrement to pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression than do other populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Hobbins & Luke Barry & Dan Kelleher & Koonal Shah & Nancy Devlin & Juan Manuel Ramos Goni & Ciaran O’Neill, 2018. "Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(11), pages 1345-1353, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0690-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0690-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-018-0690-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-018-0690-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander C Tsai, 2015. "Home Foreclosure, Health, and Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Individual, Aggregate, and Contextual Associations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Helen Dakin & Nancy Devlin & Yan Feng & Nigel Rice & Phill O'Neill & David Parkin, 2015. "The Influence of Cost‐Effectiveness and Other Factors on Nice Decisions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(10), pages 1256-1271, October.
    3. Valérie Paris & Annalisa Belloni, 2013. "Value in Pharmaceutical Pricing," OECD Health Working Papers 63, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Kelleher & Samer Kharroubi & Edel Doherty & Gianluca Baio & Ciaran O’Neill, 2022. "Examining the Association between Polish Migrant Status and Health Preferences Using a Novel Application of a Smaller Design EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 425-435, May.
    2. Ernest H. Law & A. Simon Pickard & Feng Xie & Surrey M. Walton & Todd A. Lee & Alan Schwartz, 2018. "Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(8), pages 968-982, November.
    3. Henry, Edward & Cullinan, John, 2021. "Mental health spillovers from serious family illness: Doubly robust estimation using EQ-5D-5L population normative data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Kelleher, Dan & Barry, Luke & Hobbins, Anna & O'Neill, Stephen & Doherty, Edel & O'Neill, Ciaran, 2020. "Examining the transnational health preferences of a group of Eastern European migrants relative to a European host population using the EQ-5D-5L," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Sullivan, Trudy & Hansen, Paul & Ombler, Franz & Derrett, Sarah & Devlin, Nancy, 2020. "A new tool for creating personal and social EQ-5D-5L value sets, including valuing ‘dead’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Hobbins, Anna P. & Barry, Luke & Kelleher, Dan & Shah, Koonal & Devlin, Nancy & Ramos Goni, Juan Manuel & O’Neill, Ciaran, 2020. "Do people with private health insurance attach a higher value to health than those without insurance? Results from an EQ-5D-5 L valuation study in Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(6), pages 639-646.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maynou, Laia & Cairns, John, 2019. "What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 130-139.
    2. Maynou, Laia & Cairns, John, 2018. "What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90877, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Wettstein, Dominik J. & Boes, Stefan, 2022. "How value-based policy interventions influence price negotiations for new medicines: An experimental approach and initial evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 112-121.
    4. Vásquez-Vera, Hugo & Palència, Laia & Magna, Ingrid & Mena, Carlos & Neira, Jaime & Borrell, Carme, 2017. "The threat of home eviction and its effects on health through the equity lens: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 199-208.
    5. William C. N. Dunlop & C. Daniel Mullins & Olaf Pirk & Ron Goeree & Maarten J. Postma & Ashley Enstone & Louise Heron, 2016. "BEACON: A Summary Framework to Overcome Potential Reimbursement Hurdles," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(10), pages 1051-1065, October.
    6. Sun-Hong Kwon & Hea-Sun Park & Young-Jin Na & Chul Park & Ju-Young Shin & Hye-Lin Kim, 2021. "Price Reduction of Anticancer Drugs from 2007 to 2019 in South Korea: The Impact of Pharmaceutical Cost-Containment Policies," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 439-450, May.
    7. Panagiotis Volkos & Emmanouil K Symvoulakis, 2021. "Impact of financial crisis on mental health: A literature review ‘puzzling’ findings from several countries," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(7), pages 907-919, November.
    8. Vogler, Sabine & Zimmermann, Nina & de Joncheere, Kees, 2016. "Policy interventions related to medicines: Survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010–2015," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(12), pages 1363-1377.
    9. Sánchez-Ledesma, Esther & Vásquez-Vera, Hugo & Sagarra, Natàlia & Peralta, Andrés & Porthé, Victoria & Díez, Èlia, 2020. "Perceived pathways between tourism gentrification and health: A participatory Photovoice study in the Gòtic neighborhood in Barcelona," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    10. Encarnación Sarriá & Patricia Recio & Ana Rico & Manuel Díaz-Olalla & Belén Sanz-Barbero & Alba Ayala & María Victoria Zunzunegui, 2019. "Financial Fraud, Mental Health, and Quality of Life: A Study on the Population of the City of Madrid, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Alaina Barca & Larry Santucci & Leigh-Ann Schultz, 2022. "Foreclosure Kids: Examining the Early Adult Credit Usage of Adolescents Affected by Foreclosure," Working Papers 22-21, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    12. Afschin Gandjour, 2016. "Limiting Free Pricing of New Innovative Drugs After Launch: A Necessity for Payers?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 507-509, October.
    13. Salas-Vega, Sebastian & Bertling, Annika & Mossialos, Elias, 2016. "A comparative study of drug listing recommendations and the decision-making process in Australia, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1104-1114.
    14. David Epstein & Leticia García-Mochón & Stephen Kaptoge & Simon G. Thompson, 2016. "Modeling the costs and long-term health benefits of screening the general population for risks of cardiovascular disease: a review of methods used in the literature," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(8), pages 1041-1053, November.
    15. Dominik J. Wettstein & Stefan Boes, 2020. "The impact of reimbursement negotiations on cost and availability of new pharmaceuticals: evidence from an online experiment," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. A. Carletto & A. Cicchetti & S. Coretti & V. Moramarco & M. Ruggeri, 2019. "Money back guarantee? A cost–benefit framework of performance-based agreements (PBAs) for the reimbursement of pharmaceuticals," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 89-101, March.
    17. Afschin Gandjour, 2023. "A Model-Based Estimate of the Cost-Effectiveness Threshold in Germany," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 627-635, July.
    18. García-Collado, Carlos Gustavo & Martínez-de-la-Plata, Juan Enrique & Montoro, María del Mar Maldonado & Morales, Alberto Jiménez & Hernández, Miguel Ángel Calleja & Martínez, Fernando Martínez, 2021. "Impact of a risk-sharing agreement in rheumatoid arthritis in Spain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 335-340.
    19. Angela Rocchi & Elizabeth Miller & Robert Hopkins & Ron Goeree, 2012. "Common Drug Review Recommendations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 229-246, March.
    20. Jennifer Gill & Anna-Maria Fontrier & Dionysis Kyriopoulos & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(9), pages 1375-1397, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0690-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.