IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v62y2025i2d10.1007_s12597-024-00829-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extended twin parametric margin support vector regression

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Sahleh

    (University of Guilan)

  • Maziar Salahi

    (University of Guilan)

  • Sadegh Eskandari

    (University of Guilan)

  • Tahereh Khodamoradi

    (University of Guilan)

Abstract

Support Vector Regression (SVR) and its extensions have demonstrated effectiveness in addressing regression problems, yet they face challenges, including high computational costs for large-scale datasets and sensitivity to outliers. To mitigate these limitations, various techniques such as twin SVR (TWSVR) and robust TWSVR (RTWSVR) have been proposed. However, existing approaches may suffer from issues like alignment of the final regressor with the dataset during the learning processes. In this paper, we introduce an extended twin parametric margin SVR (ETPMSVR) model inspired by the principles of robust geometric TPMSVM (RGTPSVM). The ETPMSVR addresses these challenges by integrating the average of $$\epsilon$$ ϵ -insensitive upper and lower bounds of the regressor into the objective function and constraints, ensuring alignment with the dataset and hence the final regerssor is found along with two boundary hyperplanes during the training process in a single quadratic programming problem. Additionally, a hinge-loss function is incorporated to enhance robustness against outliers. We derive the dual formulation to improve computational efficiency. Experiments on a diverse range of datasets, 10 UCI datasets and 8 S &P index datasets from financial market, demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed model in comparison to various benchmarks, including TWSVR, RTWSVR, multi-layer perceptron, and long short-term memory network.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Sahleh & Maziar Salahi & Sadegh Eskandari & Tahereh Khodamoradi, 2025. "Extended twin parametric margin support vector regression," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 62(2), pages 682-705, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:62:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-024-00829-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-024-00829-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-024-00829-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-024-00829-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liao, Zhiqiang & Dai, Sheng & Kuosmanen, Timo, 2024. "Convex support vector regression," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 858-870.
    2. D. Goldfarb & G. Iyengar, 2003. "Robust Portfolio Selection Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 1-38, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kang, Yan-li & Tian, Jing-Song & Chen, Chen & Zhao, Gui-Yu & Li, Yuan-fu & Wei, Yu, 2021. "Entropy based robust portfolio," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    2. Juan F. Monge & Mercedes Landete & Jos'e L. Ruiz, 2016. "Sharpe portfolio using a cross-efficiency evaluation," Papers 1610.00937, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    3. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    4. Mainik, Georg & Mitov, Georgi & Rüschendorf, Ludger, 2015. "Portfolio optimization for heavy-tailed assets: Extreme Risk Index vs. Markowitz," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 115-134.
    5. Maillet, Bertrand & Tokpavi, Sessi & Vaucher, Benoit, 2015. "Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk: A robust regression-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 289-299.
    6. Paul Glasserman & Wanmo Kang, 2014. "OR Forum—Design of Risk Weights," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1204-1220, December.
    7. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    8. Jang Ho Kim & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2017. "Penalizing variances for higher dependency on factors," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 479-489, April.
    9. Maria Scutellà & Raffaella Recchia, 2013. "Robust portfolio asset allocation and risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 145-169, April.
    10. Yilie Huang & Yanwei Jia & Xun Yu Zhou, 2024. "Mean--Variance Portfolio Selection by Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms, Regret Analysis, and Empirical Study," Papers 2412.16175, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    11. Ashrafi, Hedieh & Thiele, Aurélie C., 2021. "A study of robust portfolio optimization with European options using polyhedral uncertainty sets," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    12. Ran Ji & Miguel A. Lejeune, 2021. "Data-Driven Optimization of Reward-Risk Ratio Measures," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1120-1137, July.
    13. Kolm, Petter N. & Tütüncü, Reha & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 356-371.
    14. Costa, Oswaldo L.V. & de Oliveira Ribeiro, Celma & Rego, Erik Eduardo & Stern, Julio Michael & Parente, Virginia & Kileber, Solange, 2017. "Robust portfolio optimization for electricity planning: An application based on the Brazilian electricity mix," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-169.
    15. Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal & Tan Wang, 2007. "Portfolio Selection with Parameter and Model Uncertainty: A Multi-Prior Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 20(1), pages 41-81, January.
    16. F. Cong & C. W. Oosterlee, 2017. "On Robust Multi-Period Pre-Commitment And Time-Consistent Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Gautam Sabnis & Debdeep Pati & Anirban Bhattacharya, 2019. "Compressed Covariance Estimation with Automated Dimension Learning," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 81(2), pages 466-481, December.
    18. Adrian Gepp & Geoff Harris & Bruce Vanstone, 2020. "Financial applications of semidefinite programming: a review and call for interdisciplinary research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3527-3555, December.
    19. Hans Buehler & Blanka Horvath & Yannick Limmer & Thorsten Schmidt, 2025. "Uncertainty-Aware Strategies: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Robust Financial Optimization through Subsampling," Papers 2506.07299, arXiv.org.
    20. Katrin Schöttle & Ralf Werner & Rudi Zagst, 2010. "Comparison and robustification of Bayes and Black-Litterman models," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 71(3), pages 453-475, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:62:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-024-00829-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.