IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v55y2018i3d10.1007_s12597-018-0340-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective bi-level supply chain network order allocation problem under fuzziness

Author

Listed:
  • Srikant Gupta

    (Aligarh Muslim University)

  • Irfan Ali

    (Aligarh Muslim University)

  • Aquil Ahmed

    (Aligarh Muslim University)

Abstract

In this paper we addressed supply chain network (SCN) as bi-level programming problem in which the primary objective is to determine optimal order allocation of products where the customer’s demands and supply for the products are fuzzy. In the proposed SCN model, we suppose that the first level (leader) and second level (follower) operate two separate groups of SCN. The leader, who moves first, determines quantities shipped to retailers, and then, the follower decides his quantities rationally. The leader’s objective is to minimize the total transportation costs, and similarly, the follower’s objective is to minimize the total delivery time of the SCN and at the same time balancing the optimal order allocation from each source, plant, retailer and warehouse respectively. The fuzzy goal programming approach has been used to achieve the highest degree of the membership goals by minimizing the deviational variables so that most satisfactory or the preferred solution for both the levels to be obtained. A numerical example is given to demonstrate the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Srikant Gupta & Irfan Ali & Aquil Ahmed, 2018. "Multi-objective bi-level supply chain network order allocation problem under fuzziness," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 721-748, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:55:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-018-0340-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-018-0340-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-018-0340-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-018-0340-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lejeune, M.A., 2006. "A variable neighborhood decomposition search method for supply chain management planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 959-976, December.
    2. Chang, Yung-Chia & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2004. "Machine scheduling with job delivery coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 470-487, October.
    3. Arindam Garai & Palash Mandal & Tapan Kumar Roy, 2016. "Intuitionistic fuzzy T-sets based optimization technique for production-distribution planning in supply chain management," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 950-975, December.
    4. Ahmad Yusuf Adhami & Syed Mohd Muneeb & Mohammad Asim Nomani, 2017. "A multilevel decision making model for the supplier selection problem in a fuzzy situation," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(4), pages 5-26.
    5. Zeng, Qing & Zhang, Baohua & Fang, Jiakun & Chen, Zhe, 2017. "A bi-level programming for multistage co-expansion planning of the integrated gas and electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 192-203.
    6. Liu, Shiang-Tai & Kao, Chiang, 2004. "Solving fuzzy transportation problems based on extension principle," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 661-674, March.
    7. Syed Aqib Jalil & Shakeel Javaid & Syed Mohd Muneeb, 2018. "A decentralized multi-level decision making model for solid transportation problem with uncertainty," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 1022-1033, October.
    8. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Nishizaki, Ichiro & Uemura, Yoshio, 2001. "Fuzzy programming and profit and cost allocation for a production and transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Selim, Hasan & Araz, Ceyhun & Ozkarahan, Irem, 2008. "Collaborative production-distribution planning in supply chain: A fuzzy goal programming approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 396-419, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peidro, David & Mula, Josefa & Jiménez, Mariano & del Mar Botella, Ma, 2010. "A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 65-80, August.
    2. Mohammed, Ahmed & Wang, Qian, 2017. "The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 47-58.
    3. Masoud Esmaeilikia & Behnam Fahimnia & Joeseph Sarkis & Kannan Govindan & Arun Kumar & John Mo, 2016. "Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: definition and review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 407-427, September.
    4. Masoud Esmaeilikia & Behnam Fahimnia & Joeseph Sarkis & Kannan Govindan & Arun Kumar & John Mo, 2016. "A tactical supply chain planning model with multiple flexibility options: an empirical evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 429-454, September.
    5. Jiuping Xu & Guomin Fang & Zezhong Wu, 2016. "Network equilibrium of production, transportation and pricing for multi-product multi-market," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(3), pages 567-595, December.
    6. Sasan Khalifehzadeh & Mehdi Seifbarghy & Bahman Naderi, 2017. "Solving a fuzzy multi objective model of a production–distribution system using meta-heuristic based approaches," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 95-109, January.
    7. Mula, Josefa & Peidro, David & Díaz-Madroñero, Manuel & Vicens, Eduardo, 2010. "Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 377-390, August.
    8. Aurelija Burinskienė, 2021. "Designing a Multi-Stage Transport System Serving e-Commerce Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. F. Jolai & J. Razmi & N. Rostami, 2011. "A fuzzy goal programming and meta heuristic algorithms for solving integrated production: distribution planning problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(4), pages 547-569, December.
    10. Jason Pan & Chi-Shiang Su, 2015. "Two parallel machines problem with job delivery coordination and availability constraint," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 653-664, December.
    11. Aunedi, Marko & Pantaleo, Antonio Marco & Kuriyan, Kamal & Strbac, Goran & Shah, Nilay, 2020. "Modelling of national and local interactions between heat and electricity networks in low-carbon energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Wan, Long & Zhang, An, 2014. "Coordinated scheduling on parallel machines with batch delivery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 199-203.
    13. S. Dutta & S. Acharya & Rajashree Mishra, 2016. "Genetic algorithm based fuzzy stochastic transportation programming problem with continuous random variables," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 835-872, December.
    14. Schmid, Verena & Doerner, Karl F. & Laporte, Gilbert, 2013. "Rich routing problems arising in supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 435-448.
    15. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M. & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2019. "Modelling and analysis of intermodal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 281-297.
    16. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    17. Sun Lee, Ik & Yoon, S.H., 2010. "Coordinated scheduling of production and delivery stages with stage-dependent inventory holding costs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 509-521, December.
    18. Bogdana Stanojević & Milan Stanojević & Sorin Nădăban, 2021. "Reinstatement of the Extension Principle in Approaching Mathematical Programming with Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Ullrich, Christian A., 2013. "Integrated machine scheduling and vehicle routing with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 152-165.
    20. Azeddine Cheref & Alessandro Agnetis & Christian Artigues & Jean-Charles Billaut, 2017. "Complexity results for an integrated single machine scheduling and outbound delivery problem with fixed sequence," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 681-693, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:55:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-018-0340-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.