IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v9y2018i5d10.1007_s13198-018-0720-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decentralized multi-level decision making model for solid transportation problem with uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Aqib Jalil

    (Aligarh Muslim University)

  • Shakeel Javaid

    (Aligarh Muslim University)

  • Syed Mohd Muneeb

    (Aligarh Muslim University)

Abstract

In this paper, a multi-level model for the solid transportation problem having uncertain variables is presented. Multi-level programming deals with the situation where more than one decision maker is available to model decentralized planning problem in any hierarchical system. In the model presented in this paper, all the parameters involved viz. transportation costs, supply availabilities, demands and conveyance capacities are considered as uncertain parameters. As the problem is based on uncertainty theory, the idea of minimizing (or maximizing) the expectation of objective functions under the set of chance constraints is followed to formulate the problem. A crisp model equivalent to the multi-level uncertain solid transportation problem is also given. A fuzzy based solution approach for solving multi-level programming problems is discussed to solve the presented model. Further, a numerical example of a three-level uncertain solid transportation problem with two conveyance options is given in order to understand the model more clearly.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Aqib Jalil & Shakeel Javaid & Syed Mohd Muneeb, 2018. "A decentralized multi-level decision making model for solid transportation problem with uncertainty," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 1022-1033, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0720-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-018-0720-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-018-0720-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-018-0720-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omar Ben-Ayed & Charles E. Blair, 1990. "Computational Difficulties of Bilevel Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 556-560, June.
    2. Wayne F. Bialas & Mark H. Karwan, 1984. "Two-Level Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(8), pages 1004-1020, August.
    3. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    4. Ahmad Yusuf Adhami & Syed Mohd Muneeb & Mohammad Asim Nomani, 2017. "A multilevel decision making model for the supplier selection problem in a fuzzy situation," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(4), pages 5-26.
    5. K. B. Haley, 1962. "New Methods in Mathematical Programming---The Solid Transportation Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 448-463, August.
    6. Yufu Ning & Taoyong Su, 2017. "A multilevel approach for modelling vehicle routing problem with uncertain travelling time," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 683-688, March.
    7. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    8. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1973. "Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Srikant Gupta & Irfan Ali & Aquil Ahmed, 2018. "Multi-objective bi-level supply chain network order allocation problem under fuzziness," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 721-748, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashenafi Woldemariam & Semu Kassa, 2015. "Systematic evolutionary algorithm for general multilevel Stackelberg problems with bounded decision variables (SEAMSP)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 771-790, June.
    2. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    3. Walid Ben-Ameur & Adam Ouorou & Guanglei Wang & Mateusz Żotkiewicz, 2018. "Multipolar robust optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 395-434, December.
    4. Sinha, Surabhi & Sinha, S. B., 2002. "KKT transformation approach for multi-objective multi-level linear programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 19-31, November.
    5. Alexander Engau, 2017. "Proper Efficiency and Tradeoffs in Multiple Criteria and Stochastic Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 119-134, January.
    6. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kato, Kosuke & Nishizaki, Ichiro, 2003. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for multiobjective stochastic linear programming problems through an expectation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 665-672, March.
    7. Zhou, Feng & Huang, Gordon H. & Chen, Guo-Xian & Guo, Huai-Cheng, 2009. "Enhanced-interval linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 323-333, December.
    8. Budnitzki, Alina, 2014. "Computation of the optimal tolls on the traffic network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 247-251.
    9. Maji, Chandi Charan, 1975. "Intertemporal allocation of irrigation water in the Mayurakshi Project (India): an application of deterministic and chance-constrained linear programming," ISU General Staff Papers 197501010800006381, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Bo Zeng, 2020. "A Practical Scheme to Compute the Pessimistic Bilevel Optimization Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1128-1142, October.
    11. Syed Mohd Muneeb & Ahmad Yusuf Adhami & Zainab Asim & Syed Aqib Jalil, 2019. "Bi-level decision making models for advertising allocation problem under fuzzy environment," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(2), pages 160-172, April.
    12. Gabriel Lopez Zenarosa & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2021. "On exact solution approaches for bilevel quadratic 0–1 knapsack problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 555-572, March.
    13. Shih-Pin Chen & Wen-Lung Huang, 2014. "Solving Fuzzy Multiproduct Aggregate Production Planning Problems Based on Extension Principle," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-18, August.
    14. Pramanik, Surapati & Roy, Tapan Kumar, 2007. "Fuzzy goal programming approach to multilevel programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1151-1166, January.
    15. Chi-Bin Cheng & Hsu-Shih Shih & Boris Chen, 2017. "Subsidy rate decisions for the printer recycling industry by bi-level optimization techniques," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 901-919, October.
    16. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    17. Thomas Kleinert & Martine Labbé & Fr¨ank Plein & Martin Schmidt, 2020. "Technical Note—There’s No Free Lunch: On the Hardness of Choosing a Correct Big-M in Bilevel Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1716-1721, November.
    18. M. Sakawa & T. Matsui & H. Katagiri, 2013. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for random fuzzy multiobjective integer programming problems through probability maximization with possibility," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 335-350, September.
    19. Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "Benders Decomposition for Discrete–Continuous Linear Bilevel Problems with application to traffic network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 163-172.
    20. Carlos Henggeler Antunes & Maria João Alves & Billur Ecer, 2020. "Bilevel optimization to deal with demand response in power grids: models, methods and challenges," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 814-842, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0720-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.