IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i7d10.1007_s11069-025-07113-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances and challenges in assessing submarine landslide risks to marine infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Miaojun Sun

    (PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited
    Zhejiang Huadong Construction Engineering Corporation Limited)

  • Yang Liu

    (Tongji University)

  • Liuyuan Zhao

    (PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited
    Zhejiang Huadong Construction Engineering Corporation Limited)

  • Wei Xie

    (PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited
    Zhejiang Huadong Construction Engineering Corporation Limited)

  • Wuwei Mao

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

Abstract

Submarine landslides, as a significant marine geological phenomenon, pose substantial risks to underwater construction projects such as offshore oil and gas exploitation, submarine pipelines and cables, offshore wind power installations, and even coastal engineering. However, existing reviews on submarine landslides primarily focus on summarizing their triggering mechanisms and flow characteristics from the perspective of the landslides themselves, while rarely addressing their impact on ocean engineering applications, which lacks practical significance. Therefore, following an in-depth analysis of the fundamental characteristics, mechanisms of occurrence, and relevant influencing factors of submarine landslides, this study provides an in-depth exploration into the potential impact of submarine landslides on marine infrastructure through illustrative examples of past submarine landslide incidents. Additionally, it proposes risk assessment methodologies as well as monitoring and mitigation strategies for related projects. The key findings from our research are as follows: (1) There is an urgent need to establish a unified classification standard for types of submarine landslides instead of continuously refining their categorization; (2) The primary distinction between marine engineering and land-based engineering lies in the complex marine dynamic environment that necessitates considerations such as geological conditions, environmental factors, and structural design; (3) Current measures to prevent submarine landslide disasters in marine engineering primarily focus on avoiding hazardous areas during the design and exploration stages, with limited emphasis on post-landslide disaster prevention and mitigation measures; (4) Existing field investigation techniques for studying submarine landslides predominantly concentrate on basic research aimed at identifying already existing occurrences but lack industrial applicability due to being mostly experimental single-object monitoring approaches; (5) Numerical models used to simulate submarine landslides often oversimplify the phenomenon's complexity hindering practical project applications. Henceforth, it is crucial to consider macro–micro interconnected effects when simulating the evolution of underwater landslide movements.

Suggested Citation

  • Miaojun Sun & Yang Liu & Liuyuan Zhao & Wei Xie & Wuwei Mao, 2025. "Advances and challenges in assessing submarine landslide risks to marine infrastructure," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(7), pages 7811-7837, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07113-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07113-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07113-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07113-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hernandez-Estrada, Edwin & Lastres-Danguillecourt, Orlando & Robles-Ocampo, Jose B. & Lopez-Lopez, Andres & Sevilla-Camacho, Perla Y. & Perez-Sariñana, Bianca Y. & Dorrego-Portela, Jose R., 2021. "Considerations for the structural analysis and design of wind turbine towers: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Matutano, Clara & Negro, Vicente & López-Gutiérrez, Jose-Santos & Esteban, M. Dolores, 2013. "Scour prediction and scour protections in offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 358-365.
    3. Bilgili, Mehmet & Yasar, Abdulkadir & Simsek, Erdogan, 2011. "Offshore wind power development in Europe and its comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 905-915, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Aldieri & Jonas Grafström & Kristoffer Sundström & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "Wind Power and Job Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Escobar, A. & Negro, V. & López-Gutiérrez, J.S. & Esteban, M.D., 2019. "Assessment of the influence of the acceleration field on scour phenomenon in offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1036-1043.
    3. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    4. Luengo, Jorge & Negro, Vicente & García-Barba, Javier & López-Gutiérrez, José-Santos & Esteban, M. Dolores, 2019. "New detected uncertainties in the design of foundations for offshore Wind Turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 667-677.
    5. Satir, Mert & Murphy, Fionnuala & McDonnell, Kevin, 2018. "Feasibility study of an offshore wind farm in the Aegean Sea, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2552-2562.
    6. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    7. Sun, Chuan & Chen, Yueyi & Cheng, Cheng, 2021. "Imputation of missing data from offshore wind farms using spatio-temporal correlation and feature correlation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Bonou, Alexandra & Laurent, Alexis & Olsen, Stig I., 2016. "Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 327-337.
    9. Pasquale Contestabile & Enrico Di Lauro & Paolo Galli & Cesare Corselli & Diego Vicinanza, 2017. "Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Assessment around Malè and Magoodhoo Island (Maldives)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Kamila Pronińska & Krzysztof Księżopolski, 2021. "Baltic Offshore Wind Energy Development—Poland’s Public Policy Tools Analysis and the Geostrategic Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Zountouridou, E.I. & Kiokes, G.C. & Chakalis, S. & Georgilakis, P.S. & Hatziargyriou, N.D., 2015. "Offshore floating wind parks in the deep waters of Mediterranean Sea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 433-448.
    12. Al-Nassar, W.K. & Neelamani, S. & Al-Salem, K.A. & Al-Dashti, H.A., 2019. "Feasibility of offshore wind energy as an alternative source for the state of Kuwait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 783-796.
    13. Christoffer Hallgren & Johan Arnqvist & Stefan Ivanell & Heiner Körnich & Ville Vakkari & Erik Sahlée, 2020. "Looking for an Offshore Low-Level Jet Champion among Recent Reanalyses: A Tight Race over the Baltic Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Gallagher, Sarah & Tiron, Roxana & Whelan, Eoin & Gleeson, Emily & Dias, Frédéric & McGrath, Ray, 2016. "The nearshore wind and wave energy potential of Ireland: A high resolution assessment of availability and accessibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 494-516.
    15. Ling, Yu & Cai, Xu, 2012. "Exploitation and utilization of the wind power and its perspective in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2111-2117.
    16. Shu, Z.R. & Li, Q.S. & Chan, P.W., 2015. "Investigation of offshore wind energy potential in Hong Kong based on Weibull distribution function," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 362-373.
    17. Kern, Florian & Smith, Adrian & Shaw, Chris & Raven, Rob & Verhees, Bram, 2014. "From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 635-646.
    18. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2018. "A lifecycle techno-economic model of offshore wind energy for different entry and exit instances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 406-424.
    19. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Wind Energy Market in Poland in the Background of the Baltic Sea Bordering Countries in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Lenci, Stefano, 2023. "Along-wind and cross-wind coupled nonlinear oscillations of wind turbine towers close to 1:1 internal resonance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07113-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.