IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i15d10.1007_s11069-025-07494-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flood susceptibility mapping of urban flood risk: comparing autoencoder multilayer perceptron and logistic regression models in Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Noriyasu Tsumita

    (Kanazawa University)

  • Suwanno Piyapong

    (Rajamangala University of Technology)

  • Ratthanaporn Kaewkluengklom

    (Ubon Ratchathani University)

  • Sittha Jaensirisak

    (Ubon Ratchathani University)

  • Atsushi Fukuda

    (Nihon University)

Abstract

Riverine flooding in Southeast Asian cities increasingly affects their residents, often causing prolonged negative consequences due to their geographic position in lowland areas. The rapid expansion of urban areas into highly vulnerable zones has only exacerbated this issue. To mitigate flood risk, it is crucial to assess and map flood susceptibility and for incorporation into future urban planning. This study evaluates and compares the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and the autoencoder multilayer perceptron (AE-MLP), an advanced model, for urban flood risk assessment in Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand. The models were assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and several indexes (accuracy, F1-score, precision, Recall). This study also mapped vulnerable populations based on estimated flood risk from each model. The AE-MLP model outperformed the LR model, achieving an AUC of 0.950 compared to 0.860. An analysis of flood risk distribution revealed that the LR model estimated 1.79% of the population residing in high-risk areas and 0.83% in very high-risk areas. In comparison, the AE-MLP model estimated 24.00 and 7.97%, respectively, demonstrating its superior sensitivity in identifying vulnerable zones. These findings indicate that the AE-MLP model can significantly improve flood risk prediction and accurately identify high-risk areas. Integrating these models into urban planning and disaster management frameworks can enhance resilience to flooding.

Suggested Citation

  • Noriyasu Tsumita & Suwanno Piyapong & Ratthanaporn Kaewkluengklom & Sittha Jaensirisak & Atsushi Fukuda, 2025. "Flood susceptibility mapping of urban flood risk: comparing autoencoder multilayer perceptron and logistic regression models in Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(15), pages 17833-17867, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:15:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07494-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07494-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07494-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07494-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Ehsan Alvandi & Chandrashekhar Meshram & Ercan Kahya & Ayad M. Fadhil Al-Quraishi, 2020. "Application of SAW and TOPSIS in Prioritizing Watersheds," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 715-732, January.
    2. Jakub Langhammer, 2010. "Analysis of the relationship between the stream regulations and the geomorphologic effects of floods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 54(1), pages 121-139, July.
    3. Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam & Md. Mijanur Rahman Bappi & Saeed Alqadhi & Ahmed Ali Bindajam & Javed Mallick & Swapan Talukdar, 2023. "Improvement of flood susceptibility mapping by introducing hybrid ensemble learning algorithms and high-resolution satellite imageries," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 1-37, October.
    4. Nanda Khoirunisa & Cheng-Yu Ku & Chih-Yu Liu, 2021. "A GIS-Based Artificial Neural Network Model for Flood Susceptibility Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Halit Enes Aydin & Muzaffer Can Iban, 2023. "Predicting and analyzing flood susceptibility using boosting-based ensemble machine learning algorithms with SHapley Additive exPlanations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 2957-2991, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazem Ghassan Abdo & Sahar Mohammed Richi & Saeed Alqadhi & Taorui Zeng & Pankaj Prasad & Ioannis Kotaridis & Maged Muteb Alharbi & Lina A. Khaddour & Javed Mallick, 2025. "A hybrid machine learning modelling for optimization of flood susceptibility mapping in the eastern Mediterranean," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(6), pages 7199-7228, April.
    2. Mohammed J. Alshayeb & Hoang Thi Hang & Ahmed Ali A. Shohan & Ahmed Ali Bindajam, 2024. "Novel optimized deep learning algorithms and explainable artificial intelligence for storm surge susceptibility modeling and management in a flood-prone island," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(6), pages 5099-5128, April.
    3. Arash Malekian & Ali Azarnivand, 2016. "Application of Integrated Shannon’s Entropy and VIKOR Techniques in Prioritization of Flood Risk in the Shemshak Watershed, Iran," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 409-425, January.
    4. Reza Esmaili & Seyedeh Atefeh Karipour, 2024. "Comparison of weighting methods of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in evaluation of flood hazard index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8619-8638, July.
    5. Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Vijay P. Singh & Ercan Kahya & Ehsan Alvandi & Chandrashekhar Meshram & Shailesh Kumar Sharma, 2020. "The Feasibility of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Prioritization of Sensitive Area at Risk of Water Erosion," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4665-4685, December.
    6. Zoran Ilić & Goran Marinković & Vladimir Bulatović & Anđelko Matić & Vladimir M. Petrović, 2025. "Comprehensive MCDM Approach in the Process of Land Consolidation Project Choice," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Chiranjit Singha & Neha Chakraborty & Satiprasad Sahoo & Quoc Bao Pham & Yunqing Xuan, 2025. "A novel framework for flood susceptibility assessment using hybrid analytic hierarchy process-based machine learning methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(11), pages 13765-13810, June.
    8. Gul, Muhammet & Yucesan, Melih, 2022. "Performance evaluation of Turkish Universities by an integrated Bayesian BWM-TOPSIS model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Anna Porębska & Krzysztof Muszyński & Izabela Godyń & Kinga Racoń-Leja, 2023. "City and Water Risk: Accumulated Runoff Mapping Analysis as a Tool for Sustainable Land Use Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Göçmen Polat, Elifcan & Yücesan, Melih & Gül, Muhammet, 2023. "A comparative framework for criticality assessment of strategic raw materials in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.
    12. Ramón Espinel & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & José Luis Rivadeneira García & Paulo Escandón-Panchana, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence in Agricultural Mapping: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-36, July.
    13. Mariusz Starzec & Sabina Kordana-Obuch, 2024. "Evaluating the Utility of Selected Machine Learning Models for Predicting Stormwater Levels in Small Streams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    14. Tereza BAŽATOVÁ & Jana ŠIMKOVÁ, 2015. "Changes in runoff regime. The Lomnice catchment case study," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 40-48.
    15. Shuxian Liu & Yang Liu & Zhigang Chu & Kun Yang & Guanlan Wang & Lisheng Zhang & Yuanda Zhang, 2023. "Evaluation of Tropical Cyclone Disaster Loss Using Machine Learning Algorithms with an eXplainable Artificial Intelligence Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Shadi Maddah & Barat Mojaradi & Hosein Alizadeh, 2025. "Improving deep learning-based flood susceptibility modeling by integrating data balancing technique and dual-input convolutional neural network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(15), pages 17555-17577, August.
    17. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak, 2021. "Simple Additive Weighting versus Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution: which method is better suited for assessing the sustainability of a real estate project," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 180-196, June.
    18. Fatemeh Rezaie & Mahdi Panahi & Sayed M. Bateni & Changhyun Jun & Christopher M. U. Neale & Saro Lee, 2022. "Novel hybrid models by coupling support vector regression (SVR) with meta-heuristic algorithms (WOA and GWO) for flood susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1247-1283, November.
    19. Adolfo López-Pérez & Gerardo Colín-García & Héctor Moya & Martín Alejandro Bolaños-González & Demetrio Salvador Fernández-Reynoso & Angel Saul Cruz-Ramírez, 2024. "Application of the Analytic Network Process for Sub-Watershed Prioritization in the Huehuetan River Basin, Chiapas, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    20. Ping Fan & Yihao Zhu & Zi Ye & Guodao Zhang & Shanchuan Gu & Qi Shen & Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Ehsan Alvandi, 2023. "Identification and Prioritization of Tourism Development Strategies Using SWOT, QSPM, and AHP: A Case Study of Changbai Mountain in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:15:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07494-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.