Author
Abstract
This study investigates geomorphic thresholds that control cascading hazards initiated by large landslides (volume > 105 m3), particularly their potential to generate natural dams or transform into debris flows. These two outcomes represent primary pathways in which large landslide debris interacts with channel networks, triggering downstream or upstream hazards. Using a global dataset of 188 large landslides, we analyzed key geomorphic parameters including inflow angle (entry angle of landslide into channel), local relief, and channel gradient. Our findings reveal distinct geomorphic thresholds: natural dams tend to form when landslides enter channels at inflow angles > 60° and encounter channel gradients 10°. Power-law scaling exponents between landslide area and volume were lower for debris flows than for natural dam-forming landslides, reflecting differences in failure depth and mobility. While this study focuses on natural dam formation and debris flows as dominant hazard sequences, other outcomes such as channel infilling with sediment or partial blockage may occur depending on local topography and hydrological conditions. To avoid conflating past observations with future projections, we frame our results as empirical thresholds that help assess the potential for cascading impacts. These insights are particularly relevant for mountain communities in tectonically active regions where limited infrastructure, isolation, and steep terrain amplify hazard exposure. By identifying simple geomorphic thresholds associated with hazard transitions, this study provides a framework for improving risk assessment, early warning strategies, and land use planning to enhance hazard mitigation strategies and support evidence-based land use management.
Suggested Citation
Hefryan Sukma Kharismalatri & Takashi Gomi & Roy C. Sidle, 2025.
"Geomorphic thresholds for cascading hazards of debris flows and natural dam formation caused by large landslides,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(13), pages 15537-15552, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07402-0
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07402-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07402-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.