IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i8d10.1007_s11069-024-06546-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring the drought in Southern Africa from space-borne GNSS-R and SMAP data

Author

Listed:
  • Komi Edokossi

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Shuanggen Jin

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Usman Mazhar

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Iñigo Molina

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)

  • Andres Calabia

    (University of Alcala)

  • Irfan Ullah

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
    Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

Abstract

Drought, a highly detrimental natural disaster, poses significant threats to both human populations, wildlife, and vegetation. Traditional methods of monitoring soil moisture levels rely on ground-based measurements from meteorological stations. However, these stations often lack comprehensive coverage in certain agricultural areas, necessitating the use of alternative methods such as satellite remote sensing. This technique provides a reliable means of measuring soil moisture, a critical factor in effective agricultural management. This paper investigates variations in soil moisture and drought using data from the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) and the Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) system. To evaluate the accuracy of these data products, we compared both datasets with the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) NOAH model from 2018 to 2019. Our findings reveal a strong correlation between the datasets and the model, with Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of approximately r = 0.98 and RMSE = 0.03 for SMAP, and r = 0.97 and RMSE = 0.02 for CYGNSS, respectively. We further compared these measurement datasets with drought indicators such as the Standardized Precipitation Index over three months (SPI3), the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Total Water Storage (TWS). The correlation coefficients between SMAP and the three indicators (NDVI, SPI3, and TWS) were 0.93, 0.84, and 0.047, respectively, while the coefficients between CYGNSS and the same indicators were 0.86, 0.78, and 0.56, respectively. All the variables also exhibited significant p-values. Despite minor differences, the results demonstrate excellent agreement. Our findings underscore the sensitivity of space-based sensors to drought conditions, highlighting their effectiveness as tools for detecting and monitoring drought (e.g. agricultural drought), particularly in the short term.

Suggested Citation

  • Komi Edokossi & Shuanggen Jin & Usman Mazhar & Iñigo Molina & Andres Calabia & Irfan Ullah, 2024. "Monitoring the drought in Southern Africa from space-borne GNSS-R and SMAP data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(8), pages 7947-7967, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06546-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06546-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06546-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06546-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Soil moisture; Drought; Remote sensing; SPI3; NDVI; TWS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06546-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.