IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i5d10.1007_s11069-023-06372-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of social capital as a key player in disaster risk comprehension and dissemination: lived experience of rural communities in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Ashfaq Ahmad Shah

    (China Agricultural University)

  • Abid Khan

    (Taizhou University)

  • Ayat Ullah

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Nasir Abbas Khan

    (University of Guelph)

  • Bader Alhafi Alotaibi

    (King Saud University)

Abstract

The efficacy of the community response to flood hazards is closely intertwined with its social capital. Communities with high social capital (robust social networks and cohesive community bonds) are likely to have greater abilities in preparing for and dealing with flood hazards. Numerous studies have continuously emphasized the fundamental significance of social capital throughout all stages of disaster risk management. It is still not fully understood how social capital effectively conveys risks. The present study sought to look at the experiences of rural communities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, with the specific objective of exploring the role of social capital in facilitating the comprehension and dissemination of risk alerts about flood hazards. This study used a comprehensive qualitative methodology, specifically semi-structured interviews, to investigate the local communities' perspectives and use of social capital or networks in the context of risk communication. A total of 48 participants, encompassing a range of backgrounds, including social workers, community leaders, and elders, were engaged in face-to-face interviews. The data that was gathered were then grouped according to specific themes. The researchers utilized the interpretive analysis approach to understand better how the participants interpreted and comprehended the situation within the larger social and institutional framework. The research findings revealed four primary themes: the interpretation and dissemination of risk messages through social networks, the role of community social service connections in accessing social capital and risk information, the negative consequences of social capital maldistribution, and the limitations of social connectedness. The study's results revealed that many individuals impacted by flood hazard's lack access to strong social networks, which may hinder their capacity to obtain and understand information regarding potential risks. The efficient use of hazard alerts, customized to accommodate varied groups' unique interactive and cultural requirements, requires a collaborative and inclusive approach involving several stakeholders, including community people. Implementing this method is paramount in addressing and reducing socioeconomic inequalities within the natural hazards and disaster preparedness framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Abid Khan & Ayat Ullah & Nasir Abbas Khan & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, 2024. "The role of social capital as a key player in disaster risk comprehension and dissemination: lived experience of rural communities in Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(5), pages 4131-4157, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06372-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06372-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06372-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06372-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynn J. Frewer & Joachim Scholderer & Lone Bredahl, 2003. "Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 1117-1133, December.
    2. Vaughan, E. & Tinker, T., 2009. "Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(S2), pages 324-332.
    3. Alice Fothergill & Lori Peek, 2004. "Poverty and Disasters in the United States: A Review of Recent Sociological Findings," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 32(1), pages 89-110, May.
    4. Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Jingzhong Ye & Muhammad Abid & Raza Ullah, 2017. "Determinants of flood risk mitigation strategies at household level: a case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 415-430, August.
    5. Grant Schellenberg & Chaohui Lu & Christoph Schimmele & Feng Hou, 2018. "The Correlates of Self-Assessed Community Belonging in Canada: Social Capital, Neighbourhood Characteristics, and Rootedness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 597-618, November.
    6. Michael K. Lindell & Seong Nam Hwang, 2008. "Households' Perceived Personal Risk and Responses in a Multihazard Environment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 539-556, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia He & Linmei Zhuang & Xin Deng & Dingde Xu, 2023. "Peer effects in disaster preparedness: whether opinion leaders make a difference," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 187-213, January.
    2. Hye‐Jin Paek & Thomas Hove, 2019. "Mediating and Moderating Roles of Trust in Government in Effective Risk Rumor Management: A Test Case of Radiation‐Contaminated Seafood in South Korea," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2653-2667, December.
    3. Casie Venable & Amy Javernick-Will & Abbie B. Liel, 2020. "Perceptions of Post-Disaster Housing Safety in Future Typhoons and Earthquakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Wahid Ullah & Nasir Abbas Khan & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Chong Xu, 2024. "Mapping Rural Household Vulnerability to Flood-Induced Health Risks in Disaster-Stricken Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Mertens, K. & Jacobs, L. & Maes, J. & Poesen, J. & Kervyn, M. & Vranken, L., 2018. "Disaster risk reduction among households exposed to landslide hazard: A crucial role for self-efficacy?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 77-91.
    6. Alejandra Maldonado & Timothy W. Collins & Sara E. Grineski & Jayajit Chakraborty, 2016. "Exposure to Flood Hazards in Miami and Houston: Are Hispanic Immigrants at Greater Risk than Other Social Groups?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Amaya, Johanna & Serrano, Ivan & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián & Pérez, Cinthia C., 2024. "Implications of trust, preparedness, risk perceptions, and local context on deprivation costs and disaster relief planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Christoph Clar & Lukas Löschner & Ralf Nordbeck & Tatjana Fischer & Thomas Thaler, 2021. "Population dynamics and natural hazard risk management: conceptual and practical linkages for the case of Austrian policy making," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(2), pages 1765-1796, January.
    9. Marcos Vinício Wink Junior & Lucas G. Santos & Felipe Garcia Ribeiro & Carolina S. Trindade, 2024. "Natural disasters and poverty: evidence from a flash flood in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23795-23816, September.
    10. Farman Ullah & Shahab E. Saqib & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad & Mahmoud Ali Fadlallah, 2020. "Flood risk perception and its determinants among rural households in two communities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 225-247, October.
    11. Abinash Bhattachan & Matthew D. Jurjonas & Priscilla R. Morris & Paul J. Taillie & Lindsey S. Smart & Ryan E. Emanuel & Erin L. Seekamp, 2019. "Linking residential saltwater intrusion risk perceptions to physical exposure of climate change impacts in rural coastal communities of North Carolina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1277-1295, July.
    12. Wei Zhong, 2017. "Simulating influenza pandemic dynamics with public risk communication and individual responsive behavior," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 475-495, December.
    13. Dong, Kangyin & Zhao, Congyu & Nepal, Rabindra & Zander, Kerstin K., 2025. "Are natural disasters stumbling blocks to carbon inequality mitigation? A global perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Hashida, Yukiko & Dundas, Steven J., 2023. "The effects of a voluntary property buyout and acquisition program on coastal housing markets: Evidence from New York," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Somayeh Ahmadi & Rezvan Ghanbari Movahed & Saeed Gholamrezaie & Mehdi Rahimian, 2022. "Assessing the Vulnerability of Rural Households to Floods at Pol-e Dokhtar Region in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Kit S. Hagemann & Joachim Scholderer, 2009. "Hot Potato: Expert‐Consumer Differences in the Perception of a Second‐Generation Novel Food," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7), pages 1041-1055, July.
    17. Jantsje M. Mol & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Julia E. Blasch & Hans de Moel, 2020. "Insights into Flood Risk Misperceptions of Homeowners in the Dutch River Delta," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1450-1468, July.
    18. Chia-Lee Yang & Benjamin J. C. Yuan & Chi-Yo Huang, 2015. "Key Determinant Derivations for Information Technology Disaster Recovery Site Selection by the Multi-Criterion Decision Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-40, May.
    19. Laura K. Siebeneck & Thomas J. Cova, 2012. "Spatial and Temporal Variation in Evacuee Risk Perception Throughout the Evacuation and Return‐Entry Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1468-1480, September.
    20. Arouri, Mohamed & Nguyen, Cuong & Youssef, Adel Ben, 2015. "Natural Disasters, Household Welfare, and Resilience: Evidence from Rural Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 59-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06372-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.