IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i1d10.1007_s11069-023-06176-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slope-scale landslide susceptibility assessment based on coupled models of frequency ratio and multiple regression analysis with limited historical hazards data

Author

Listed:
  • Jianfeng Sun

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Tiesheng Yan

    (Southern Zhejiang Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute)

  • Jinshu Hu

    (Southern Zhejiang Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute)

  • Chao Ma

    (Southern Zhejiang Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute)

  • Jiajun Gao

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Hui Xu

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

Abstract

Conducting a precise landslide susceptibility assessment at the slope scale is challenging due to complex parameters and limited historical hazards data. This paper proposes a susceptibility assessment model based on the frequency ratio (FR) coupled with multiple regression analysis to solve these problems. Assessment factors were identified through field surveys and remote sensing interpretation. We utilized multiple methods, such as logistic regression (LR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), ridge regression (RR), stepwise regression (SR), and discriminant analysis (DA), and established five coupled models (FR-LR, FR-PLSR, FR-RR, FR-SR, and FR-DA). The reliability of the susceptibility assessment results was systematically verified. The results showed the following: (1) for the distribution of the susceptibility index, FR-PLSR, FR-RR, and FR-DA are close to the standard normal distribution; (2) for the prediction accuracy, the AUC indexes of the five models are relatively large, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87; and (3) for the susceptibility zoning reliability, FR-PLSR and FR-RR showed better performance, with a relatively smaller area proportion and larger susceptibility intensity for high susceptibility regions. Finally, the coupled models FR-PLSR and FR-RR were recommended. The areas of slope units categorized as high-, medium-, low-, and extra low-susceptibility are 16.14 km2, 73.85 km2, 98.96 km2, and 39.49 km2, respectively, accounting for 7.06%, 32.33%, 43.32%, and 17.29% of the study area. This work enriches the theoretical understanding of the susceptibility assessment models with limited historical hazards data and provides an effective coupled model for high-accuracy landslide assessment and prevention at the slope scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianfeng Sun & Tiesheng Yan & Jinshu Hu & Chao Ma & Jiajun Gao & Hui Xu, 2024. "Slope-scale landslide susceptibility assessment based on coupled models of frequency ratio and multiple regression analysis with limited historical hazards data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06176-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06176-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06176-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06176-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Plangg Riegel & Darlan Daniel Alves & Bruna Caroline Schmidt & Guilherme Garcia Oliveira & Claus Haetinger & Daniela Montanari Migliavacca Osório & Marco Antônio Siqueira Rodrigues & Daniela M, 2020. "Assessment of susceptibility to landslides through geographic information systems and the logistic regression model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 497-511, August.
    2. Minda Ma & Ran Yan & Weiguang Cai, 2017. "An extended STIRPAT model-based methodology for evaluating the driving forces affecting carbon emissions in existing public building sector: evidence from China in 2000–2015," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(2), pages 741-756, November.
    3. Rui-Xuan Tang & E-Chuan Yan & Tao Wen & Xiao-Meng Yin & Wei Tang, 2021. "Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Sandeep Kumar & Vikram Gupta, 2021. "Evaluation of spatial probability of landslides using bivariate and multivariate approaches in the Goriganga valley, Kumaun Himalaya, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2461-2488, December.
    5. Xilin Liu & Dan Zhang, 2004. "Comparison of Two Empirical Models for Gully-Specific Debris Flow Hazard Assessment in Xiaojiang Valley of Southwestern China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 31(1), pages 157-175, January.
    6. Qi Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Denghua Yan & Yulong Bao, 2013. "Dynamic risk prediction based on discriminant analysis for maize drought disaster," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 1275-1284, February.
    7. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Nitheshnirmal Sadhasivam & Mahdis Amiri & Saeedeh Eskandari & M. Santosh, 2021. "Landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping using state-of-the art machine learning techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1291-1316, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia García-García & Catalina B. García-García & Román Salmerón, 2021. "Confronting collinearity in environmental regression models: evidence from world data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 895-926, September.
    2. Batmyagmar Dashbold & L. Sebastian Bryson & Matthew M. Crawford, 2023. "Landslide hazard and susceptibility maps derived from satellite and remote sensing data using limit equilibrium analysis and machine learning model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 235-265, March.
    3. Huadan Fan & Yuefeng Lu & Yulong Hu & Jun Fang & Chengzhe Lv & Changqing Xu & Xinyi Feng & Yanru Liu, 2022. "A Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Highway Disasters Based on the Frequency Ratio Coupling Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Yanrong Liu & Zhongqiu Meng & Lei Zhu & Di Hu & Handong He, 2023. "Optimizing the Sample Selection of Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Information Value Models in the Dabie Mountain Area of Anhui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Yigen Qin & Genlan Yang & Kunpeng Lu & Qianzheng Sun & Jin Xie & Yunwu Wu, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of Five GIS-Based Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Mapping: A Case Study of Kaiyang County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Bo Cao & Qingyi Li & Yuhang Zhu, 2022. "Comparison of Effects between Different Weight Calculation Methods for Improving Regional Landslide Susceptibility—A Case Study from Xingshan County of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Haiyan Duan & Shipei Zhang & Siying Duan & Weicheng Zhang & Zhiyuan Duan & Shuo Wang & Junnian Song & Xian’en Wang, 2019. "Carbon Emissions Peak Prediction and the Reduction Pathway in Buildings during Operation in Jilin Province Based on LEAP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Kai Sun & Zhiqing Li & Shuangjiao Wang & Ruilin Hu, 2024. "A support vector machine model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using the Bayesian algorithm: a case study of the highways in the southern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(12), pages 11377-11398, September.
    9. Xiangyang Feng & Zhaoqi Wu & Zihao Wu & Junping Bai & Shixiang Liu & Qingwu Yan, 2025. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Xinjiang: Identifying Critical Thresholds and Interaction Effects Among Disaster-Causing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Ma, Minda & Cai, Wei & Cai, Weiguang, 2018. "Carbon abatement in China's commercial building sector: A bottom-up measurement model based on Kaya-LMDI methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 350-368.
    11. Dongxing Zhang & Dang Luo, 2022. "Assessment of agricultural drought loss using a skewed grey cloud ordered clustering model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2787-2810, December.
    12. Li, Li & Hong, Xuefei & Peng, Ke, 2019. "A spatial panel analysis of carbon emissions, economic growth and high-technology industry in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 83-92.
    13. Decai Tang & Yan Zhang & Brandon J. Bethel, 2019. "An Analysis of Disparities and Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Xu, Feng & Li, Xiaodong & Yang, Zhihan & Zhu, Chen, 2024. "Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving factor analysis of embodied CO2 emissions in China's building sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Bing Wang & Chao-Qun Cui & Yi-Xin Zhao & Bo Yang & Qing-Zhou Yang, 2019. "Carbon emissions accounting for China’s coal mining sector: invisible sources of climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1345-1364, December.
    16. Yang, Jingjing & Deng, Zhang & Guo, Siyue & Chen, Yixing, 2023. "Development of bottom-up model to estimate dynamic carbon emission for city-scale buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    17. Mengya Li & Jun Wang & Xiaojing Sun, 2016. "Scenario-based risk framework selection and assessment model development for natural disasters: a case study of typhoon storm surges," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 2037-2054, February.
    18. Vélez-Henao, Johan-Andrés & Font Vivanco, David & Hernández-Riveros, Jesús-Antonio, 2019. "Technological change and the rebound effect in the STIRPAT model: A critical view," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1372-1381.
    19. Gang Chen & Taorui Zeng & Dongsheng Liu & Hao Chen & Linfeng Wang & Liping Wang & Kaiqiang Zhang & Thomas Glade, 2025. "Geomorphological and Geological Characteristics Slope Unit: Advancing Township-Scale Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Strategies," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-43, February.
    20. Shaohan Zhang & Shucheng Tan & Hui Geng & Ronwei Li & Yongqi Sun & Jun Li, 2023. "Evaluation of Geological Hazard Risk in Yiliang County, Yunnan Province, Using Combined Assignment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06176-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.