IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v116y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-022-05808-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trend prediction model of online public opinion in emergencies based on fluctuation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liwei Xu

    (Dongbei University of Finance and Economics)

  • Jiangnan Qiu

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Jie Zhai

    (Dalian University of Technology)

Abstract

Prior research has ignored the influence of fluctuation factors on online public opinion in emergencies, which has led to low prediction accuracy. This paper determines fluctuation factors through text analysis and emotional calculation; it identifies the main factors that cause the fluctuation in public opinion through the Granger causality test. Furthermore, we built a trend prediction model based on the gray prediction model and optimized it by considering the fluctuation factors of online public opinion. Optimization enhances the precision of the model and makes it more suitable to forecast trends for online public opinion. Finally, by looking at a large number of online public opinion on four kinds of typical emergencies, we verified the validity of the proposed model. In short, this paper provides a novel theoretical perspective for trend prediction of online public opinion research.

Suggested Citation

  • Liwei Xu & Jiangnan Qiu & Jie Zhai, 2023. "Trend prediction model of online public opinion in emergencies based on fluctuation analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3301-3320, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:116:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05808-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05808-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05808-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05808-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xueming Luo & Jie Zhang & Wenjing Duan, 2013. "Social Media and Firm Equity Value," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 146-163, March.
    2. Shoubin Kong & Fei Ye & Ling Feng & Zhe Zhao, 2015. "Towards the prediction problems of bursting hashtags on Twitter," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2566-2579, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    2. Kunpeng Zhang & Wendy Moe, 2021. "Measuring Brand Favorability Using Large-Scale Social Media Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1128-1139, December.
    3. Bertschek, Irene & Kesler, Reinhold, 2022. "Let the user speak: Is feedback on Facebook a source of firms’ innovation?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Tingting Song & Jinghua Huang & Yong Tan & Yifan Yu, 2019. "Using User- and Marketer-Generated Content for Box Office Revenue Prediction: Differences Between Microblogging and Third-Party Platforms," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 191-203, March.
    5. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    6. Corbet, Shaen & Hou, Yang & Hu, Yang & Oxley, Les, 2020. "The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on asset-price discovery: Testing the case of Chinese informational asymmetry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    8. Jose Benitez & Laura Ruiz & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-02462583, HAL.
    9. Breithaupt, Patrick & Kesler, Reinhold & Niebel, Thomas & Rammer, Christian, 2020. "Intangible capital indicators based on web scraping of social media," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-046, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Nivo Ravaonorohanta & Mohammad Refakar, 2021. "Target Social Media Presence and Its Effects on Acquirers’ Decision," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 1-1, February.
    11. Oberoi, Poonam & Patel, Chirag & Haon, Christophe, 2017. "Technology sourcing for website personalization and social media marketing: A study of e-retailing industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 10-23.
    12. Sophie Cockcroft & Mark Russell, 2018. "Big Data Opportunities for Accounting and Finance Practice and Research," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 323-333, September.
    13. Pei, Duo & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2020. "Big data and algorithmic trading against periodic and tangible asset reporting: The need for U-XBRL," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    14. Pablo Gomez‐Carrasco & Giovanna Michelon, 2017. "The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 855-872, September.
    15. Nigam, Nirjhar & Benetti, Cristiane & Johan, Sofia A., 2020. "Digital start-up access to venture capital financing: What signals quality?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    16. Bhattacharya, Abhi & Sardashti, Hanieh, 2022. "The differential effect of new product preannouncements in driving institutional and individual investor ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 811-823.
    17. Donghua Zhou & Yujie Zhao & Philip T Lin & Bin Li & Adrian (Waikong) Cheung, 2019. "Can microblogging information disclosure reduce stock price synchronicity? Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 282-305, May.
    18. Ajaya Kumar Swain & Ray Qing Cao, 2019. "Using sentiment analysis to improve supply chain intelligence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 469-484, April.
    19. Hafizh Rafizal Adnan & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "Citizens’ or Government’s Will? Exploration of Why Indonesia’s Local Governments Adopt Technologies for Open Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Hailiang Chen & Prabuddha De & Yu Jeffrey Hu, 2015. "IT-Enabled Broadcasting in Social Media: An Empirical Study of Artists’ Activities and Music Sales," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 513-531, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:116:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05808-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.