IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/minecn/v38y2025i2d10.1007_s13563-025-00494-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social license to automate in the mining industry

Author

Listed:
  • Marie-Soleil Lacoursière

    (University of Saskatchewan)

Abstract

The Social License to Operate (SLO) is an established term in the mining industry that means legitimacy of mining activities achieved through ongoing acceptance and support by a majority within impacted communities. A major technological shift is underway that disrupts some of the SLO pillars for Indigenous communities impacted by mining: automation. For instance, automation of heavy equipment, a sub-set of the broader mine automation, disrupts existing SLO notions for Indigenous communities and leads to new trade-offs for them because while it results in a reduction of conventional heavy equipment operators, a sensitive issue because this role is often the gateway to semi-skilled employment in mining for Indigenous workers, it can concurrently bring several new benefits which may strengthen Indigenous communities’ vision for a sustainable future. This paper aims to establish whether Indigenous communities impacted by heavy equipment automation must accept and support heavy equipment automation activities that impact them for these activities to be legitimate and thus whether there are grounds to speak of a Social License to Automate (SLA) in the mining industry. The methodology consists of a review of various types of literature interpreted through the author’s first-hand experience in the mining industry. The SLA exists in the mining industry and is a sub-set of the SLO; Indigenous communities must accept and support heavy equipment automation initiatives that impact them prior to roll out and subsequently on an ongoing basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie-Soleil Lacoursière, 2025. "The social license to automate in the mining industry," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 38(2), pages 413-424, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:minecn:v:38:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13563-025-00494-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13563-025-00494-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13563-025-00494-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13563-025-00494-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prno, Jason, 2013. "An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 577-590.
    2. Léo-Paul Dana & Robert Brent Anderson, 2014. "Mining and communities in the Arctic: lessons from Baker Lake, Canada," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(3), pages 343-361.
    3. Bartos, Paul J., 2007. "Is mining a high-tech industry: Investigations into innovation and productivity advance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 149-158, December.
    4. Holcombe, Sarah & Kemp, Deanna, 2019. "Indigenous peoples and mine automation: An issues paper," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Pearson, C & Daff, S, 2013. "Indigenous Workforce Participation at a Mining Operation in Northern Australia," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 42-63.
    6. Yi Liu & Sandra Daff & Cecil Pearson, 2020. "Shaping Sustainable Employment and Social Consequences of Indigenous Australians in a Remote Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Léo Paul Dana & Robert Brent Anderson, 2014. "Mining and communities in the Arctic: lessons from Baker Lake, Canada," Post-Print hal-02042431, HAL.
    8. Bellamy, Drew & Pravica, Luka, 2011. "Assessing the impact of driverless haul trucks in Australian surface mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 149-158, June.
    9. Tyler McCreary & Suzanne Mills & Anne St-Amand, 2016. "Lands and Resources for Jobs: How Aboriginal Peoples Strategically Use Environmental Assessments to Advance Community Employment Aims," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 42(2), pages 212-223, June.
    10. Caron, Joanie & Asselin, Hugo & Beaudoin, Jean-Michel, 2020. "Indigenous employees’ perceptions of the strategies used by mining employers to promote their recruitment, integration and retention," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Kansake, Bruno Ayaga & Kaba, Felix Adaania & Dumakor-Dupey, Nelson Kofi & Arthur, Clement Kweku, 2019. "The future of mining in Ghana: Are stakeholders prepared for the adoption of autonomous mining systems?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caron, Joanie & Asselin, Hugo & Beaudoin, Jean-Michel, 2020. "Indigenous employees’ perceptions of the strategies used by mining employers to promote their recruitment, integration and retention," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Joel Lööw, 2022. "Understanding technology in mining and its effect on the work environment," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(1), pages 143-154, March.
    3. Kansake, Bruno Ayaga & Kaba, Felix Adaania & Dumakor-Dupey, Nelson Kofi & Arthur, Clement Kweku, 2019. "The future of mining in Ghana: Are stakeholders prepared for the adoption of autonomous mining systems?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Moore, K.R. & Moradi, S. & Doyle, K. & Sydd, O. & Amaral, V. & Bodin, J. & Brito-Parada, P.R. & Dudley, F. & Fitzpatrick, R. & Foster, P. & Goettmann, F. & Roberts, D. & Roethe, R. & Sairinen, R. & Sa, 2021. "Sustainability of switch on-switch off (SOSO) mining: Human resource development tailored to technological solutions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Juliana Segura-Salazar & Luís Marcelo Tavares, 2018. "Sustainability in the Minerals Industry: Seeking a Consensus on Its Meaning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-38, May.
    6. Sarah Holcombe & Deanna Kemp, 2020. "From pay‐out to participation: Indigenous mining employment as local development?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1122-1135, September.
    7. Onifade, Moshood & Adebisi, John Adetunji & Shivute, Amtenge Penda & Genc, Bekir, 2023. "Challenges and applications of digital technology in the mineral industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    8. A. D. Volkov & S. V. Tishkov & V. V. Karginova-Gubinova & A. P. Shcherbak, 2021. "Environmental Problems of the Arctic Region: How Do Official Data Correlate to the Population’s Perceptions?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 97-110, December.
    9. Mugebe, P. & Kizil, M.S. & Yahyaei, M. & Low, R., 2023. "Foundation of a framework for evaluating the impact of mining technological innovation on a company's market value," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    10. Erik Lund & Annika Pekkari & Jan Johansson & Joel Lööw, 2024. "Mining 4.0 and its effects on work environment, competence, organisation and society – a scoping review," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(4), pages 827-840, December.
    11. Ali, Danish & Ur Rehman, Atta, 2020. "Adoption of autonomous mining system in Pakistan – Policy, skillset, awareness and preparedness of stakeholders," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Burton, John & Kemp, Deanna & Barnes, Rodger & Parmenter, Joni, 2024. "A socio-spatial analysis of Australia's critical minerals endowment and policy implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Caron, Joanie & Asselin, Hugo & Beaudoin, Jean-Michel, 2019. "Attitudes and behaviors of mining sector employers towards the Indigenous workforce," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 108-117.
    14. Gruenhagen, Jan Henrik & Parker, Rachel, 2020. "Factors driving or impeding the diffusion and adoption of innovation in mining: A systematic review of the literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Parmenter, Joni & Dowell, Kia & Holcombe, Sarah & Alexander, Rowena, 2023. "Aboriginal employment outcomes at Argyle Diamond Mine: What constitutes success, and for whom?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    16. Calzada Olvera, Beatriz & Iizuka, Michiko, 2020. "How does innovation take place in the mining industry? : Understanding the logic behind innovation in a changing context," MERIT Working Papers 2020-019, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Babak Zolghadr-Asli & Neil McIntyre & Slobodan Djordjevic & Raziyeh Farmani & Liliana Pagliero, 2025. "How Planning Shared Infrastructure could Support Agriculture and Desalinated Irrigation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(3), pages 1215-1233, February.
    18. Judith Fessehaie & Zavareh Rustomjee & Lauralyn Kaziboni, 2016. "Mining-related national systems of innovation in southern Africa National trajectories and regional integration," WIDER Working Paper Series 084, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Okada, Isamu, 2024. "What procedures matter to social acceptance of mining? A conjoint experiment in Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Alessandri, Enrico, 2023. "Identifying technological trajectories in the mining sector using patent citation networks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minecn:v:38:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13563-025-00494-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.