IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/mathme/v69y2009i1p1-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replication and shortfall risk in a binomial model with transaction costs

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Trivellato

Abstract

The shortfall risk is defined as the optimal mean value of the terminal deficit produced by a self-financing portfolio whose initial value is smaller than what is required to replicate a contingent claim. In this paper we look for an explicit expression for it, as well as for the optimal strategy, when the market model is a binomial model with proportional transaction costs. We first study replication of European claims which satisfy suitable assumptions. We then investigate the shortfall minimization problem in a framework very similar to that without transaction costs. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Trivellato, 2009. "Replication and shortfall risk in a binomial model with transaction costs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(1), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:69:y:2009:i:1:p:1-26
    DOI: 10.1007/s00186-007-0208-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00186-007-0208-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00186-007-0208-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edirisinghe, Chanaka & Naik, Vasanttilak & Uppal, Raman, 1993. "Optimal Replication of Options with Transactions Costs and Trading Restrictions," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 117-138, March.
    2. Wolfgang J. Runggaldier & Anna Zaccaria, 2000. "A Stochastic Control Approach to Risk Management Under Restricted Information," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 277-288, April.
    3. Ken Palmer, 2001. "A Note on the Boyle–Vorst Discrete‐Time Option Pricing Model with Transactions Costs," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 357-363, July.
    4. Alexander Melnikov & Yury Petrachenko, 2005. "On option pricing in binomial market with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 141-149, January.
    5. Gino Favero & Tiziano Vargiolu, 2006. "Shortfall risk minimising strategies in the binomial model: characterisation and convergence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(2), pages 237-253, October.
    6. Bernard Bensaid & Jean‐Philippe Lesne & Henri Pagès & José Scheinkman, 1992. "Derivative Asset Pricing With Transaction Costs1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 63-86, April.
    7. Boyle, Phelim P & Vorst, Ton, 1992. "Option Replication in Discrete Time with Transaction Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(1), pages 271-293, March.
    8. Gino Favero, 2001. "Shortfall risk minimization under model uncertainty in the binomial case: adaptive and robust approaches," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 53(3), pages 493-503, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tokarz, Krzysztof & Zastawniak, Tomasz, 2006. "American contingent claims under small proportional transaction costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 65-85, December.
    2. Alet Roux, 2007. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs," Papers 0710.2758, arXiv.org.
    3. Yuan Hu & Abootaleb Shirvani & W. Brent Lindquist & Frank J. Fabozzi & Svetlozar T. Rachev, 2021. "Market Complete Option Valuation using a Jarrow-Rudd Pricing Tree with Skewness and Kurtosis," Papers 2106.09128, arXiv.org.
    4. Alet Roux & Tomasz Zastawniak, 2016. "Game options with gradual exercise and cancellation under proportional transaction costs," Papers 1612.02312, arXiv.org.
    5. Reiß, Ariane, 1997. "Option replication with large transactions costs," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 106, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    6. Hu, Yuan & Lindquist, W. Brent & Rachev, Svetlozar T. & Shirvani, Abootaleb & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2022. "Market complete option valuation using a Jarrow-Rudd pricing tree with skewness and kurtosis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Perrakis, Stylianos & Lefoll, Jean, 2000. "Option pricing and replication with transaction costs and dividends," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1527-1561, October.
    8. Clewlow, Les & Hodges, Stewart, 1997. "Optimal delta-hedging under transactions costs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1353-1376, June.
    9. Joao Amaro de Matos & Paula Antao, 2000. "Market illiquidity and the Bid-Ask spread of derivatives," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp386, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    10. Monoyios, Michael, 2004. "Option pricing with transaction costs using a Markov chain approximation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 889-913, February.
    11. Dimitris Bertsimas & Leonid Kogan & Andrew W. Lo, 2001. "Hedging Derivative Securities and Incomplete Markets: An (epsilon)-Arbitrage Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 372-397, June.
    12. Dimitris Bertsimas & Leonid Kogan & Andrew W. Lo, 2001. "When Is Time Continuous?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Marco Avellaneda (ed.), Quantitative Analysis In Financial Markets Collected Papers of the New York University Mathematical Finance Seminar(Volume II), chapter 3, pages 71-102, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Roger, Patrick, 2000. "Properties of bid and ask reservation prices in the rank-dependent expected utility model," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 269-285, November.
    14. Damgaard, Anders, 2003. "Utility based option evaluation with proportional transaction costs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 667-700, February.
    15. Constantinides, George M. & Perrakis, Stylianos, 2002. "Stochastic dominance bounds on derivatives prices in a multiperiod economy with proportional transaction costs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 26(7-8), pages 1323-1352, July.
    16. Melnikov, Alexander & Tong, Shuo, 2014. "Quantile hedging on equity-linked life insurance contracts with transaction costs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 77-88.
    17. Jacques, Sébastien & Lai, Van Son & Soumaré, Issouf, 2011. "Synthetizing a debt guarantee: Super-replication versus utility approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 27-40, January.
    18. Stefano Baccarin, 2019. "Static use of options in dynamic portfolio optimization under transaction costs and solvency constraints," Working papers 063, Department of Economics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
    19. Pieter Klaassen, 1998. "Financial Asset-Pricing Theory and Stochastic Programming Models for Asset/Liability Management: A Synthesis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 31-48, January.
    20. Lai, Tze Leung & Lim, Tiong Wee, 2009. "Option hedging theory under transaction costs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(12), pages 1945-1961, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:69:y:2009:i:1:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.