IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v21y2016i2p191-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a framework of environmental risk management for CO 2 geological storage in china: gaps and suggestions for future regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Lan-Cui Liu
  • Qi Li
  • Jiu-Tian Zhang
  • Dong Cao

Abstract

China encourages the demonstration of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. In an effort to identify gaps and provide suggestions for environmental risk management of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) geological storage in China, this article presents a concise overview of potential health, safety and environmental (HSE) risks and environmental management regulations for CO 2 geological storage in Australia, Japan, the United States (USA), the European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom (UK). The environmental impact assessment (EIA) experience of Shenhua Ordos Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) Project and PetroChina Jilin Oil Field enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is subsequently analyzed in light of our field investigation, and gaps in current EIA guidelines that are applicable to CO 2 geological storage projects are identified. It is found that there are no specific environmental risk regulations suitable for CO 2 storage in China, and environmental risk management lags behind the development of CCS technology, which presents a challenge to demonstration enterprises in terms of assessing environmental risk. One major challenge is the overestimation or underestimation of this risk on the part of the enterprise, and another is a lack of applicable regulations for government sectors to supervise the risk throughout CCS projects. Therefore, there is a pressing need for China to formulate environmental management regulations that include environmental risk assessment, mandatory monitoring schemes, environmental emergency plans, and related issues. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Lan-Cui Liu & Qi Li & Jiu-Tian Zhang & Dong Cao, 2016. "Toward a framework of environmental risk management for CO 2 geological storage in china: gaps and suggestions for future regulations," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 191-207, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:21:y:2016:i:2:p:191-207
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-014-9589-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11027-014-9589-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-014-9589-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Court & Thomas Elliot & Joseph Dammel & Thomas Buscheck & Jeremy Rohmer & Michael Celia, 2012. "Promising synergies to address water, sequestration, legal, and public acceptance issues associated with large-scale implementation of CO 2 sequestration," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 569-599, August.
    2. Stewart Russell & Nils Markusson & Vivian Scott, 2012. "What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 651-668, August.
    3. Peter Stigson & Anders Hansson & Mårten Lind, 2012. "Obstacles for CCS deployment: an analysis of discrepancies of perceptions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 601-619, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Wei & Li, Huaizhan & Chen, Yanpeng & Guo, Guangli & Chen, Fu & Tang, Chao & Zha, Jianfeng & Yuan, Yafei & Huo, Wenqi, 2024. "Risk analysis and production safety design of supercritical carbon dioxide storage in gasification combustion cavity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Liu, Bingsheng & Liu, Song & Xue, Bin & Lu, Shijian & Yang, Yang, 2021. "Formalizing an integrated decision-making model for the risk assessment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage projects: From a sustainability perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hurlbert, Margot & Osazuwa-Peters, Mac, 2023. "Carbon capture and storage in Saskatchewan: An analysis of communicative practices in a contested technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Lei Zhu & Xing Yao & Xian Zhang, 2020. "Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1261-1285, October.
    3. Nemet, Gregory F. & Zipperer, Vera & Kraus, Martina, 2018. "The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 154-167.
    4. Kristina Govorukha & Philip Mayer & Dirk Rübbelke, 2021. "Fragmented Landscape of European Policies in the Energy Sector: First-Mover Advantages," CESifo Working Paper Series 9093, CESifo.
    5. Davies, Lincoln L. & Uchitel, Kirsten & Ruple, John, 2013. "Understanding barriers to commercial-scale carbon capture and sequestration in the United States: An empirical assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 745-761.
    6. Wen Li & Yuxi Liu & Siqi Xiao & Yu Zhang & Lihe Chai, 2018. "An Investigation of the Underlying Evolution of Shale Gas Research’s Domain Based on the Co-Word Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Fertig, Emily, 2018. "Rare breakthroughs vs. incremental development in R&D strategy for an early-stage energy technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 711-721.
    8. Laurie Waller & Tim Rayner & Jason Chilvers & Clair Amanda Gough & Irene Lorenzoni & Andrew Jordan & Naomi Vaughan, 2020. "Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    9. Kang, Jia-Ning & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-cui & Yu, Bi-Ying & Liao, Hua, 2021. "A social learning approach to carbon capture and storage demonstration project management: An empirical analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Lefvert, Adrian & Grönkvist, Stefan, 2024. "Lost in the scenarios of negative emissions: The role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Maria João Regufe & Ana Pereira & Alexandre F. P. Ferreira & Ana Mafalda Ribeiro & Alírio E. Rodrigues, 2021. "Current Developments of Carbon Capture Storage and/or Utilization–Looking for Net-Zero Emissions Defined in the Paris Agreement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Jiaquan Li & Zhifu Mi & Yi-Ming Wei & Jingli Fan & Yang Yang & Yunbing Hou, 2019. "Flexible options to provide energy for capturing carbon dioxide in coal-fired power plants under the Clean Development Mechanism," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 1483-1505, December.
    13. Sharmina, Maria, 2017. "Low-carbon scenarios for Russia's energy system: A participative backcasting approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 303-315.
    14. Mehdi Zeidouni & Nam H. Tran & Muhammad D. Munawar, 2017. "Interpretation of above†zone pressure influence time to characterize CO2 leakage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(6), pages 1050-1064, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:21:y:2016:i:2:p:191-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.