IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsecdv/v24y2022i2d10.1007_s40847-022-00205-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why there is underutilization of four and more antenatal care services despite the colossal rise in institutional deliveries in Bihar, India

Author

Listed:
  • Ravi Durga Prasad

    (Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics (GIPE)
    International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS))

  • Somya Arora

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU))

  • Pradeep S. Salve

    (International Institute for Population Sciences)

  • Srinivas Goli

    (International Institute for Population Sciences)

  • K. S. James

    (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS))

  • Saseendran Pallikadavath

    (University of Portsmouth)

  • Udaya S. Mishra

    (International Institute for Population Sciences)

  • Irudaya S. Rajan

    (Centre for Development Studies (CDS))

Abstract

Despite the colossal rise in institutional delivery (from 20% in 2005–2006 to 64% in 2015–2016), the state of Bihar shows the poorest performance in the country for utilization of four or more antenatal care services (4 or more ANCs) (14%). In this background, the present paper aims to investigate the factors associated with the low uptake of ANCs in Bihar, India. The study analyses a sample of 16,822 women aged 15–49 in Bihar from the fourth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) conducted during 2015–2016. Bivariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses are employed to identify the factors associated with the underutilization of 4 or more ANCs in Bihar. Five out of 38 districts of Bihar have more than 20% uptake of 4 or more ANCs while 13 districts have only 7 to 12% of uptake. However, 79% of women had institutional delivery without having 4 or more ANCs. The results from the logistic regression model suggest that mothers who belonged to the richest wealth index (OR = 3.90; 99% CI: 2.98–5.08) and a higher level of education (OR = 3.35; 99% CI: 2.74–4.08) have a greater likelihood of receiving 4 or more ANCs. In order of their importance, focusing on economic, education, and caste inequalities, awareness of pregnancy registration with MCP cards, and avoiding higher-order births are likely to improve the uptake of 4 or more ANCs in Bihar.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravi Durga Prasad & Somya Arora & Pradeep S. Salve & Srinivas Goli & K. S. James & Saseendran Pallikadavath & Udaya S. Mishra & Irudaya S. Rajan, 2022. "Why there is underutilization of four and more antenatal care services despite the colossal rise in institutional deliveries in Bihar, India," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 24(2), pages 355-378, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s40847-022-00205-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40847-022-00205-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40847-022-00205-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40847-022-00205-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Praveen Kumar Pathak & Abhishek Singh & S V Subramanian, 2010. "Economic Inequalities in Maternal Health Care: Prenatal Care and Skilled Birth Attendance in India, 1992–2006," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Vellakkal, Sukumar & Reddy, Hanimi & Gupta, Adyya & Chandran, Anil & Fledderjohann, Jasmine & Stuckler, David, 2017. "A qualitative study of factors impacting accessing of institutional delivery care in the context of India's cash incentive program," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 55-65.
    3. Agung Dwi Laksono & Rukmini Rukmini & Ratna Dwi Wulandari, 2020. "Regional disparities in antenatal care utilization in Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Sunil, T.S. & Rajaram, S. & Zottarelli, Lisa K., 2006. "Do individual and program factors matter in the utilization of maternal care services in rural India? A theoretical approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 1943-1957, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhishek Singh & Saseendran Pallikadavath & Faujdar Ram & Reuben Ogollah, 2012. "Inequalities in Advice Provided by Public Health Workers to Women during Antenatal Sessions in Rural India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Abhishek Singh & Praveen Kumar Pathak & Rajesh Kumar Chauhan & William Pan, 2011. "Infant and Child Mortality in India in the Last Two Decades: A Geospatial Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Won Ju Hwang & Yeon Mi Park, 2019. "Factors Influencing the Accessibility of Maternal Health Service in Cambodia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Evan Borkum & Dana Rotz & Anu Rangarajan & Swetha Sridharan & Sukhmani Sethi & Mercy Manoranjini & Lakshmi Ramakrishnan & Lalit Dandona & Rakhi Dandona & Priyanka S. Kochar & G. Anil Kumar & Priyanka , "undated". "Midline Findings from the Evaluation of the Ananya Program in Bihar," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 74ef56ababd9412b82ef906fc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Jayanta Kumar Bora & Rajesh Raushan & Wolfgang Lutz, 2019. "The persistent influence of caste on under-five mortality: Factors that explain the caste-based gap in high focus Indian states," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Edmonds, Joyce K. & Hruschka, Daniel & Bernard, H. Russell & Sibley, Lynn, 2012. "Women’s social networks and birth attendant decisions: Application of the Network-Episode Model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 452-459.
    7. Tulasi Malini Maharatha & Sumirtha Gandhi & Umakant Dash, 2021. "Has the Demand and Supply-side Components of Janani Suraksha Yojana Augmented the Uptake of Maternal Health Care Services among Poor Women in India ? : An Application of Hybrid Matching Technique," BASE University Working Papers 08/2021, BASE University, Bengaluru, India.
    8. Madhu Gupta & Federica Angeli & Hans Bosma & Monica Rana & Shankar Prinja & Rajesh Kumar & Onno C P van Schayck, 2016. "Effectiveness of Multiple-Strategy Community Intervention in Reducing Geographical, Socioeconomic and Gender Based Inequalities in Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Haryana, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Aizawa, T.;, 2019. "Reviewing the Existing Evidence of the Conditional Cash Transfer in India through the Partial Identification Approach," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 19/24, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    10. Diwakar Mohan & Jean Juste Harrisson Bashingwa & Nicki Tiffin & Diva Dhar & Nicola Mulder & Asha George & Amnesty E LeFevre, 2020. "Does having a mobile phone matter? Linking phone access among women to health in India: An exploratory analysis of the National Family Health Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Fatema, Kaniz, 2020. "Mass Media Exposure and Maternal Healthcare Utilization in South Asia," SocArXiv 5dhyr, Center for Open Science.
    12. Vandita Dar & Madhvi Sethi & Saina Baby, 2023. "Direct Cash Transfers in Emerging Economies: The Case of India," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(2), pages 287-308, May.
    13. Prashant Kumar Singh & Rajesh Kumar Rai & Lucky Singh, 2012. "Examining the Effect of Household Wealth and Migration Status on Safe Delivery Care in Urban India, 1992–2006," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Muchabaiwa L. & Mazambani D. & Chigusiwa L. & Bindu S. & Mudavanhu V., 2012. "Determinants of Maternal Healthcare Utilization in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 5(2), pages 145-162, August.
    15. Felix Akpojene Ogbo & Mansi Vijaybhai Dhami & Ebere Maureen Ude & Praween Senanayake & Uchechukwu L. Osuagwu & Akorede O. Awosemo & Pascal Ogeleka & Blessing Jaka Akombi & Osita Kingsley Ezeh & Kingsl, 2019. "Enablers and Barriers to the Utilization of Antenatal Care Services in India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Baby Sharma & Suresh Jungari & Ajinkya Lawange, 2022. "Factors Affecting Fear of Childbirth Among Urban Women in India: A Qualitative Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    17. Joshua Amo-Adjei & Kofi Aduo-Adjei & Christiana Opoku-Nyamah & Chimaroake Izugbara, 2018. "Analysis of socioeconomic differences in the quality of antenatal services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Anita Makins & Jochen Ehmer & Alexandra Piprek & Francisco Mbofana & Amanda Ross & Michael André Hobbins, 2019. "Demand-side financing in the form of baby packages in Northern Mozambique: Results from an observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Ghosh, Arabinda, 2011. "Maternal health care in Indian districts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 290-296.
    20. Shreya Banerjee & Indrani Roy Chowdhury, 2020. "Inequities in curative health-care utilization among the adult population (20–59 years) in India: A comparative analysis of NSS 71st (2014) and 75th (2017–18) rounds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s40847-022-00205-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.