IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v205y2025i2d10.1007_s10957-025-02627-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Duality-Based Single-Level Reformulations of Bilevel Optimization Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Dempe

    (Freiberg University for Mining and Technology)

  • Patrick Mehlitz

    (Philipps-Universität Marburg)

Abstract

Usually, bilevel optimization problems need to be transformed into single-level ones in order to derive optimality conditions and solution algorithms. Among the available approaches, the replacement of the lower-level problem by means of duality relations became popular quite recently. We revisit three realizations of this idea which are based on the lower-level Lagrange, Wolfe, and Mond–Weir dual problem. The resulting single-level surrogate problems are equivalent to the original bilevel optimization problem from the viewpoint of global minimizers under mild assumptions. However, all these reformulations suffer from the appearance of so-called implicit variables, i.e., surrogate variables which do not enter the objective function but appear in the feasible set for modeling purposes. Treating implicit variables as explicit ones has been shown to be problematic when locally optimal solutions, stationary points, and applicable constraint qualifications are compared to the original problem. Indeed, we illustrate that the same difficulties have to be faced when using these duality-based reformulations. Furthermore, we show that the Mangasarian–Fromovitz constraint qualification is likely to be violated at each feasible point of these reformulations, contrasting assertions in some recently published papers.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Dempe & Patrick Mehlitz, 2025. "Duality-Based Single-Level Reformulations of Bilevel Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 205(2), pages 1-39, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:205:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-025-02627-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-025-02627-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-025-02627-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-025-02627-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martina Cerulli & Claudia D’Ambrosio & Leo Liberti & Mercedes Pelegrín, 2021. "Detecting and solving aircraft conflicts using bilevel programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 529-557, October.
    2. Hecheng Li & Lei Fang, 2012. "An Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Bilevel Programming Problems Using Duality Conditions," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-14, October.
    3. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1973. "Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    4. Helmut Gfrerer & Jiří V. Outrata, 2016. "On Computation of Generalized Derivatives of the Normal-Cone Mapping and Their Applications," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 1535-1556, November.
    5. Boris S. Mordukhovich & Nguyen Mau Nam & Hung M. Phan, 2012. "Variational Analysis of Marginal Functions with Applications to Bilevel Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 557-586, March.
    6. Alain B. Zemkoho & Shenglong Zhou, 2021. "Theoretical and numerical comparison of the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker and value function reformulations in bilevel optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 625-674, March.
    7. Jonathan F. Bard, 1984. "Optimality conditions for the bilevel programming problem," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 13-26, March.
    8. Stephan Dempe & Alain B. Zemkoho, 2011. "The Generalized Mangasarian-Fromowitz Constraint Qualification and Optimality Conditions for Bilevel Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 46-68, January.
    9. Herminia I. Calvete & Carmen Galé, 2004. "A Penalty Method For Solving Bilevel Linear Fractional/Linear Programming Problems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 207-224.
    10. B. D. Craven & B. Mond, 1971. "Technical Note—On Converse Duality in Nonlinear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 1075-1078, August.
    11. M. Diehl & B. Houska & O. Stein & P. Steuermann, 2013. "A lifting method for generalized semi-infinite programs based on lower level Wolfe duality," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 189-210, January.
    12. Yu-Wei Li & Gui-Hua Lin & Xide Zhu, 2024. "Solving Bilevel Programs Based on Lower-Level Mond-Weir Duality," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1225-1241, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Dempe & N. Gadhi & A. B. Zemkoho, 2013. "New Optimality Conditions for the Semivectorial Bilevel Optimization Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 54-74, April.
    2. Joydeep Dutta & Lahoussine Lafhim & Alain Zemkoho & Shenglong Zhou, 2025. "Nonconvex Quasi-Variational Inequalities: Stability Analysis and Application to Numerical Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 204(2), pages 1-43, February.
    3. Lorenzo Lampariello & Simone Sagratella, 2015. "It is a matter of hierarchy: a Nash equilibrium problem perspective on bilevel programming," DIAG Technical Reports 2015-07, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    4. R. Paulavičius & C. S. Adjiman, 2020. "New bounding schemes and algorithmic options for the Branch-and-Sandwich algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 197-225, June.
    5. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    6. P. A. Clark & A. W. Westerberg, 1988. "A note on the optimality conditions for the bilevel programming problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 413-418, October.
    7. Yanikoglu, I., 2014. "Robust optimization methods for chance constrained, simulation-based, and bilevel problems," Other publications TiSEM 45826f7e-6e21-481e-889e-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Volker Maag, 2015. "A collision detection approach for maximizing the material utilization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 761-781, July.
    9. Lei Fang & Hecheng Li, 2013. "Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 219-226, October.
    10. Jörg Fliege & Andrey Tin & Alain Zemkoho, 2021. "Gauss–Newton-type methods for bilevel optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 793-824, April.
    11. Changhong Deng & Ning Liang & Jin Tan & Gongchen Wang, 2016. "Multi-Objective Scheduling of Electric Vehicles in Smart Distribution Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, November.
    12. V. Balachandran & Edward A. Stohr, 1978. "Optimal Pricing of Computer Resources in a Competitive Environment," Discussion Papers 268, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    13. Shuang Ma & Gang Du & Jianxin (Roger) Jiao & Ruchuan Zhang, 2016. "Hierarchical game joint optimization for product family-driven modular design," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1496-1509, December.
    14. Lu Gan & Dirong Xu & Xiuyun Chen & Pengyan Jiang & Benjamin Lev & Zongmin Li, 2023. "Sustainable portfolio re-equilibrium on wind-solar-hydro system: An integrated optimization with combined meta-heuristic," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1383-1408, August.
    15. Qing Zhou & Zhengyi Wu & Wenchong Chen & Wenqing Chen & Yao Liang, 2024. "Two‐sided networks coordination for manufacturing technology standards' diffusion from home to host countries: A one‐leader and multiple‐followers Stackelberg game with multiple objectives," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 2108-2129, June.
    16. Rebeca Ramirez Acosta & Chathura Wanigasekara & Emilie Frost & Tobias Brandt & Sebastian Lehnhoff & Christof Büskens, 2023. "Integration of Intelligent Neighbourhood Grids to the German Distribution Grid: A Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Abdul Sattar Safaei & Saba Farsad & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar, 2020. "Emergency logistics planning under supply risk and demand uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1437-1460, September.
    18. Karabulut, Ezgi & Aras, Necati & Kuban Altınel, İ., 2017. "Optimal sensor deployment to increase the security of the maximal breach path in border surveillance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 19-36.
    19. S. Dempe & A. Zemkoho, 2012. "Bilevel road pricing: theoretical analysis and optimality conditions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 223-240, July.
    20. S. Dutta & S. Acharya, 2024. "A Novel Approach to Solve Multi-objective Fuzzy Stochastic Bilevel Programming Using Genetic Algorithm," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:205:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-025-02627-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.