IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v169y2016i2d10.1007_s10957-016-0893-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic Forward–Backward Splitting for Monotone Inclusions

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Rosasco

    (Università di Genova
    Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia and Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Silvia Villa

    (Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia and Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Bang Công Vũ

    (Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia and Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

We propose and analyze the convergence of a novel stochastic algorithm for monotone inclusions that are sum of a maximal monotone operator and a single-valued cocoercive operator. The algorithm we propose is a natural stochastic extension of the classical forward–backward method. We provide a non-asymptotic error analysis in expectation for the strongly monotone case, as well as almost sure convergence under weaker assumptions. For minimization problems, we recover rates matching those obtained by stochastic extensions of the so-called accelerated methods. Stochastic quasi-Fejér’s sequences are a key technical tool to prove almost sure convergence.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Rosasco & Silvia Villa & Bang Công Vũ, 2016. "Stochastic Forward–Backward Splitting for Monotone Inclusions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 388-406, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:169:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-016-0893-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-016-0893-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-016-0893-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-016-0893-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DEVOLDER, Olivier, 2011. "Stochastic first order methods in smooth convex optimization," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011070, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Chen Xiaohong & White Halbert, 2002. "Asymptotic Properties of Some Projection-based Robbins-Monro Procedures in a Hilbert Space," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-55, April.
    3. NESTEROV, Yu., 2007. "Gradient methods for minimizing composite objective function," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2007076, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Qihang Lin & Xi Chen & Javier Peña, 2014. "A sparsity preserving stochastic gradient methods for sparse regression," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 455-482, June.
    5. Monnez, Jean-Marie, 2006. "Almost sure convergence of stochastic gradient processes with matrix step sizes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(5), pages 531-536, March.
    6. Kengy Barty & Jean-Sébastien Roy & Cyrille Strugarek, 2007. "Hilbert-Valued Perturbed Subgradient Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 551-562, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Geiersbach & Teresa Scarinci, 2021. "Stochastic proximal gradient methods for nonconvex problems in Hilbert spaces," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 705-740, April.
    2. Renato D. C. Monteiro & Camilo Ortiz & Benar F. Svaiter, 2016. "An adaptive accelerated first-order method for convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 31-73, May.
    3. Regina S. Burachik & Yaohua Hu & Xiaoqi Yang, 2022. "Interior quasi-subgradient method with non-Euclidean distances for constrained quasi-convex optimization problems in hilbert spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 249-271, June.
    4. Umberto Amato & Anestis Antoniadis & Italia De Feis & Irene Gijbels, 2021. "Penalised robust estimators for sparse and high-dimensional linear models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(1), pages 1-48, March.
    5. Kohli, Priya & Garcia, Tanya P. & Pourahmadi, Mohsen, 2016. "Modeling the Cholesky factors of covariance matrices of multivariate longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 87-100.
    6. DEVOLDER, Olivier & GLINEUR, François & NESTEROV, Yurii, 2011. "First-order methods of smooth convex optimization with inexact oracle," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011002, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Jiahe Lin & George Michailidis, 2019. "Approximate Factor Models with Strongly Correlated Idiosyncratic Errors," Papers 1912.04123, arXiv.org.
    8. Mingqiang Li & Congying Han & Ruxin Wang & Tiande Guo, 2017. "Shrinking gradient descent algorithms for total variation regularized image denoising," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 643-660, December.
    9. Hansen, Christian & Liao, Yuan, 2019. "The Factor-Lasso And K-Step Bootstrap Approach For Inference In High-Dimensional Economic Applications," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 465-509, June.
    10. Lingxue Zhang & Seyoung Kim, 2014. "Learning Gene Networks under SNP Perturbations Using eQTL Datasets," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Umberto Amato & Anestis Antoniadis & Italia Feis & Irène Gijbels, 2022. "Penalized wavelet estimation and robust denoising for irregular spaced data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1621-1651, September.
    12. Silvia Villa & Lorenzo Rosasco & Sofia Mosci & Alessandro Verri, 2014. "Proximal methods for the latent group lasso penalty," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 381-407, June.
    13. Wachirapong Jirakitpuwapat & Poom Kumam & Yeol Je Cho & Kanokwan Sitthithakerngkiet, 2019. "A General Algorithm for the Split Common Fixed Point Problem with Its Applications to Signal Processing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Kengy Barty & Jean-Sébastien Roy & Cyrille Strugarek, 2007. "Hilbert-Valued Perturbed Subgradient Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 551-562, August.
    15. Kenneth Lange & Eric C. Chi & Hua Zhou, 2014. "A Brief Survey of Modern Optimization for Statisticians," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(1), pages 46-70, April.
    16. Vishwajit Hegde & Arvind S. Menon & L. A. Prashanth & Krishna Jagannathan, 2021. "Online Estimation and Optimization of Utility-Based Shortfall Risk," Papers 2111.08805, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    17. D. Russell Luke & Nguyen H. Thao & Matthew K. Tam, 2018. "Quantitative Convergence Analysis of Iterated Expansive, Set-Valued Mappings," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1143-1176, November.
    18. Felipe Perez-Marti, 2000. "Private Experience in Adaptive Learning Models," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(2), pages 283-310, April.
    19. Majid Jahani & Naga Venkata C. Gudapati & Chenxin Ma & Rachael Tappenden & Martin Takáč, 2021. "Fast and safe: accelerated gradient methods with optimality certificates and underestimate sequences," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 369-404, June.
    20. Qihang Lin & Lin Xiao, 2015. "An adaptive accelerated proximal gradient method and its homotopy continuation for sparse optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 633-674, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:169:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-016-0893-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.