IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joprea/v40y2023i3d10.1007_s12546-023-09313-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with discordance of actual and preferred living arrangements among older adults: an analytical cross-sectional study in India

Author

Listed:
  • Shobhit Srivastava

    (International Institute for Population Sciences)

  • T. Muhammad

    (International Institute for Population Sciences)

  • Priya Saravanakumar

    (University of Technology Sydney)

Abstract

Despite the historical and cultural context of multigenerational living and family-oriented and filial old age-support in India, increased dependence of older adults on their children is becoming less of a norm than in the past. In this study, we explore the factors associated with the mismatch between preferred and actual living arrangements among older adults. We used national-level survey data from the survey of ‘building knowledge base on population aging in India’. The sample consisted of 9540 older adults age 60 years and above. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression and interaction models were used to explore the associated factors of living arrangement discordance. A total of 35.2% of older adults reported discordance in their living arrangements. Older adults who reported feeling not comfortable with their present living arrangement had higher odds of discordance in living arrangement (AOR: 1.38, 95% CI 1.17, 1.63) than those who felt comfortable. The odds of discordance in living arrangement were 1.90 (95% CI 1.68, 2.14) among older adults who were currently in a marital union with reference to their counterparts who were not in a marital union. With the increase in the number of the surviving children, the likelihood of discordance in living arrangement among older adults significantly decreased. The interaction results for gender and feeling about present living arrangement suggested that only females who were comfortable about their present living arrangement (AOR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.56, 0.96) had significantly lower odds of discordance in living arrangement. Likewise, if educated older adults felt comfortable with their current living arrangement, they were less likely to report discordance in their living arrangement (AOR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.84). The higher rates of mismatch in preferred and actual living arrangements of older adults in India may have implications on housing options available to them. Given the higher proportion of the aged population living in discordance between actual and preferred arrangements, our findings have implications for policies influencing development of older adults’ healthcare and social support programs in India as well as in other developing countries with similar cultural landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Shobhit Srivastava & T. Muhammad & Priya Saravanakumar, 2023. "Factors associated with discordance of actual and preferred living arrangements among older adults: an analytical cross-sectional study in India," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:40:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12546-023-09313-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12546-023-09313-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12546-023-09313-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12546-023-09313-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ariela Lowenstein, 2007. "Solidarity–Conflict and Ambivalence: Testing Two Conceptual Frameworks and Their Impact on Quality of Life for Older Family Members," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(2), pages 100-107.
    2. Lingguo Cheng & Hong Liu & Ye Zhang & Zhong Zhao, 2018. "The heterogeneous impact of pension income on elderly living arrangements: evidence from China’s new rural pension scheme," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 155-192, January.
    3. John Bongaarts & Zachary Zimmer, 2002. "Living Arrangements of Older Adults in the Developing World," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 57(3), pages 145-157.
    4. Sabrina T. Wong & Grace J. Yoo & Anita L. Stewart, 2006. "The Changing Meaning of Family Support Among Older Chinese and Korean Immigrants," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 61(1), pages 4-9.
    5. Tannistha Samanta & Feinian Chen & Reeve Vanneman, 2015. "Living Arrangements and Health of Older Adults in India," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(6), pages 937-947.
    6. Xu, Yanfeng & Bright, Charlotte Lyn & Ahn, Haksoon & Huang, Hui & Shaw, Terry, 2020. "A new kinship typology and factors associated with receiving financial assistance in kinship care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Fang Cai & John Giles & Philip O'Keefe & Dewen Wang, 2012. "The Elderly and Old Age Support in Rural China : Challenges and Prospects," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2249.
    8. Albert I. Hermalin & Li‐Shou Yang, 2004. "Levels of Support from Children in Taiwan: Expectations versus Reality, 1965–99," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 417-448, September.
    9. Julie DaVanzo & Angelique Chan, 1994. "Living arrangements of older malaysians: Who coresides with their adult children?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 31(1), pages 95-113, February.
    10. repec:wbk:wbpubs:6007 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Qian Jin & Philip Pearce & Hui Hu, 2018. "The Study on the Satisfaction of the Elderly People Living with Their Children," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 1159-1172, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Ying & Fang, Shuai & Yang, Zan, 2018. "Living arrangements of the elderly: A new perspective from choice constraints in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 101-116.
    2. Bradley, Elizabeth & Chen, Xi & Tang, Gaojie, 2020. "Social security expansion and neighborhood cohesion: Evidence from community-living older adults in China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    3. Angelique Chan & Abhijit Visaria & Bina Gubhaju & Stefan Ma & Yasuhiko Saito, 2021. "Gender differences in years of remaining life by living arrangement among older Singaporeans," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 453-466, December.
    4. Chen, Xi & Wang, Tianyu & Busch, Susan H., 2019. "Does money relieve depression? Evidence from social pension expansions in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 411-420.
    5. AO, Xiang & JIANG, Dawei & ZHAO, Zhong, 2016. "The impact of rural–urban migration on the health of the left-behind parents," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 126-139.
    6. Min Qin & Jane Falkingham & Maria Evandrou & Athina Vlachantoni, 2020. "Attitudes and preferences towards future old-age support amongst tomorrow’s elders in China," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(11), pages 285-314.
    7. Bingzheng Chen & Peiyun Deng & Xiaodong Fan, 2022. "Effect of compulsory education on retirement financial outcomes: evidence from China," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(4), pages 958-989, October.
    8. Zhaohua Zhang & Yuxi Luo & Derrick Robinson, 2020. "Do Social Pensions Help People Living on the Edge? Assessing Determinants of Vulnerability to Food Poverty Among the Rural Elderly," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(1), pages 198-219, January.
    9. Yatish Kumar & Priya Bhakat, 2022. "Social Capital in Old-Age and the Role of the Social Marginalisation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 371-388, August.
    10. Nikolov, Plamen & Adelman, Alan, 2019. "Do private household transfers to the elderly respond to public pension benefits? Evidence from rural China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    11. Hu, Shu & Das, Dhiman, 2019. "Quality of life among older adults in China and India: Does productive engagement help?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 144-153.
    12. Calvo, Esteban & Williamson, John B., 2006. "Old-Age Pension Reform and Modernization Pathways: Lessons for China from Latin America," MPRA Paper 4872, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    13. Sibai, Abla M. & Yount, Kathryn M. & Fletcher, Astrid, 2007. "Marital status, intergenerational co-residence and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality among middle-aged and older men and women during wartime in Beirut: Gains and liabilities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 64-76, January.
    14. Jing You & Miguel Niño‐Zarazúa, 2019. "The Intergenerational Impact of China's New Rural Pension Scheme," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(S1), pages 47-95, December.
    15. Mitra, Sophie & Gao, Qin & Chen, Wei & Zhang, Yalu, 2020. "Health, work, and income among middle-aged and older adults: A panel analysis for China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    16. Miguel, Edward A. & Gertler, Paul & Levine, David I., 2003. "Did Industrialization Destroy Social Capital in Indonesia?," Center for International and Development Economics Research, Working Paper Series qt9kt2m860, Center for International and Development Economics Research, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    17. Koh, Eun & Daughtery, Laura & Ware, Allysa, 2022. "Informal kinship caregivers’ parenting experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Wang, Dazhe & Qian, Wenrong & Guo, Xiaolin, 2019. "Gains and losses: Does farmland acquisition harm farmers’ welfare?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 78-90.
    19. Miaoxi Zhao & Yanliu Lin & Huiqin Wang, 2022. "Locational Differences of Collective Land and Their Socioeconomic Effects on the Rural Elderly in China’s Pearl River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Shen, Ke & Wang, Feng & Cai, Yong, 2016. "Patterns of inequalities in public transfers by gender in China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 76-84.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:40:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12546-023-09313-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.