IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v33y2022i7d10.1007_s10845-022-01975-4.html

Capturing and incorporating expert knowledge into machine learning models for quality prediction in manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Link

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU)

  • Miltiadis Poursanidis

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM)

  • Jochen Schmid

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM)

  • Rebekka Zache

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU)

  • Martin Kurnatowski

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM)

  • Uwe Teicher

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU)

  • Steffen Ihlenfeldt

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU
    Technische Universität Dresden)

Abstract

Increasing digitalization enables the use of machine learning (ML) methods for analyzing and optimizing manufacturing processes. A main application of ML is the construction of quality prediction models, which can be used, among other things, for documentation purposes, as assistance systems for process operators, or for adaptive process control. The quality of such ML models typically strongly depends on the amount and the quality of data used for training. In manufacturing, the size of available datasets before start of production (SOP) is often limited. In contrast to data, expert knowledge commonly is available in manufacturing. Therefore, this study introduces a general methodology for building quality prediction models with ML methods on small datasets by integrating shape expert knowledge, that is, prior knowledge about the shape of the input–output relationship to be learned. The proposed methodology is applied to a brushing process with 125 data points for predicting the surface roughness as a function of five process variables. As opposed to conventional ML methods for small datasets, the proposed methodology produces prediction models that strictly comply with all the expert knowledge specified by the involved process specialists. In particular, the direct involvement of process experts in the training of the models leads to a very clear interpretation and, by extension, to a high acceptance of the models. While working out the shape knowledge requires some iterations in general, another clear merit of the proposed methodology is that, in contrast to most conventional ML, it involves no time-consuming and often heuristic hyperparameter tuning or model selection step.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Link & Miltiadis Poursanidis & Jochen Schmid & Rebekka Zache & Martin Kurnatowski & Uwe Teicher & Steffen Ihlenfeldt, 2022. "Capturing and incorporating expert knowledge into machine learning models for quality prediction in manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(7), pages 2129-2142, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-022-01975-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-022-01975-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-022-01975-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-022-01975-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Chernozhukov & I. Fernández-Val & A. Galichon, 2009. "Improving point and interval estimators of monotone functions by rearrangement," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 559-575.
    2. Che-Jung Chang & Wen-Li Dai & Chien-Chih Chen, 2015. "A novel procedure for multimodel development using the grey silhouette coefficient for small-data-set forecasting," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(11), pages 1887-1894, November.
    3. Jia Hao & Mengying Zhou & Guoxin Wang & Liangyue Jia & Yan Yan, 2020. "Design optimization by integrating limited simulation data and shape engineering knowledge with Bayesian optimization (BO-DK4DO)," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 2049-2067, December.
    4. Lizhen Lin & David B. Dunson, 2014. "Bayesian monotone regression using Gaussian process projection," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(2), pages 303-317.
    5. Heng Zhang & Utpal Roy & Yung-Tsun Tina Lee, 2020. "Enriching analytics models with domain knowledge for smart manufacturing data analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(20), pages 6399-6415, October.
    6. V. Chernozhukov & I. Fernández-Val & A. Galichon, 2009. "Improving point and interval estimators of monotone functions by rearrangement," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 559-575.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fadi El Kalach & Ibrahim Yousif & Thorsten Wuest & Amit Sheth & Ramy Harik, 2025. "Cognitive manufacturing: definition and current trends," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(6), pages 3695-3715, August.
    2. Pei Wang & Tao Wang & Sheng Yang & Han Cheng & Pengde Huang & Qianle Zhang, 2024. "Production quality prediction of cross-specification products using dynamic deep transfer learning network," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 2567-2592, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val & Blaise Melly & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2020. "Generic Inference on Quantile and Quantile Effect Functions for Discrete Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 123-137, January.
    2. Koen Jochmans, 2013. "Pairwise‐comparison estimation with non‐parametric controls," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 16(3), pages 340-372, October.
    3. Yunyun Wang & Tatsushi Oka & Dan Zhu, 2023. "Distributional Vector Autoregression: Eliciting Macro and Financial Dependence," Papers 2303.04994, arXiv.org.
    4. Jiyuan Tan & Jose Blanchet & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2026. "Partial Identification of Policy-Relevant Treatment Effects with Instrumental Variables via Optimal Transport," Papers 2604.12263, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    5. Victor Chernozhukov & Whitney K. Newey & Andres Santos, 2023. "Constrained Conditional Moment Restriction Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(2), pages 709-736, March.
    6. Tibor Szendrei & Nikolett V'ag'o & Katalin Varga, 2026. "A Roof Over Risk: A House Price-at-Risk Framework for Hungary," Papers 2602.18592, arXiv.org.
    7. Denis Chetverikov & Daniel Wilhelm, 2016. "Nonparametric instrumental variable estimation under monotonicity," CeMMAP working papers 48/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Horowitz, Joel L. & Lee, Sokbae, 2017. "Nonparametric estimation and inference under shape restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 108-126.
    9. Nathan Kallus, 2025. "Semiparametric Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Single-Index Model," Papers 2512.21917, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    10. Marc Henry & Koen Jochmans & Bernard Salanié, 2014. "Inference on Mixtures Under Tail Restrictions," Working Papers hal-01053810, HAL.
    11. Belloni, Alexandre & Chernozhukov, Victor & Chetverikov, Denis & Fernández-Val, Iván, 2019. "Conditional quantile processes based on series or many regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 4-29.
    12. Kneib, Thomas & Silbersdorff, Alexander & Säfken, Benjamin, 2023. "Rage Against the Mean – A Review of Distributional Regression Approaches," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 99-123.
    13. Tibor Szendrei & Arnab Bhattacharjee & Mark E. Schaffer, 2024. "Fused LASSO as Non-Crossing Quantile Regression," Papers 2403.14036, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    14. Xuanjing Su, 2026. "Endogenous Quantile Regression with Measurement Error in Dependent Variable," Papers 2605.20601, arXiv.org.
    15. Alfred Galichon & Marc Henry, 2026. "An econometrician's guide to optimal transport," Papers 2604.04227, arXiv.org.
    16. Victor Chernozhukov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Ivan Fernandez-Val, 2017. "Generic machine learning inference on heterogenous treatment effects in randomized experiments," CeMMAP working papers CWP61/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Dong, Chaohua & Chen, Rong & Xiao, Zhijie & Liu, Weiyi, 2024. "Functional quantile autoregression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(2).
    18. Parmeter, Christopher, 2025. "A simple approach to estimate technical efficiency in stochastic frontier models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    19. Tjeerd De Vries, 2026. "Recovering Risk-Neutral Moments from Options," Papers 2601.14852, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    20. José F. Tudón M., 2019. "Perception, utility, and evolution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 7(2), pages 191-208, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-022-01975-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.