IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v14y2023i4d10.1007_s13132-022-01054-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Knowledge-Based Economic Strength Between China and the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Jinhui Li

    (Yanbian University)

  • Gwang-Nam Rim

    (Yanbian University
    Kim Il Sung University)

  • Chol-Ju An

    (Yanbian University
    Kim Il Sung University)

Abstract

Entering the era of knowledge economy, knowledge is the important source of economic growth and is the basis for ensuring the sustainable development of economy even under any disadvantageous environment. This paper addresses the comparison of economic strength between China and the USA from a view of knowledge economy. To this end, based on analysis of previous studies, the authors conceptualize the knowledge-based economic strength, establish the indicators system for its comparison between China and the USA, and conduct the comparison and analysis based on them. The findings are that (1) while China gets ahead of the USA in exports of high-tech manufactures and numbers of knowledge resources, the USA gets ahead of China in GDP per capita, receipts of intellectual properties, human capital, financial expenditure, and ICT infrastructure, (2) China has mostly focused on quantitative growth of knowledge resources rather than qualitative growth, (3) China has devoted many efforts to the decrease of differences in almost all aspects of knowledge-based economic strength from the USA, and (4) for both countries, degrees of contributions of resource indicators to GDP per capita are different. Given that competition between China and the USA enters the new stage, this comparative study may serve as the policy basis in taking the technological measures for further strengthening its own economic strength for China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinhui Li & Gwang-Nam Rim & Chol-Ju An, 2023. "Comparative Study of Knowledge-Based Economic Strength Between China and the USA," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4256-4292, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:14:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-022-01054-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-022-01054-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-022-01054-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-022-01054-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando Del Rio & Francisco-Xavier Lores, 2017. "Regulation and rent-seeking: The role of the distribution of political and economic power," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 19(5), pages 986-1008, October.
    2. Dragomir Sundac & Irena Fatur Krmpotic, 2011. "Knowledge Economy Factors and the Development of Knowledge-based Economy," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 13(1), pages 105-141, April.
    3. Gwang-Nam Rim & Gang-Sok Kim & Sun-Hui Hwang & Un-Dok Ko, 2019. "Some Problems in Statistically Assessing the Level of Knowledge Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 974-996, September.
    4. Yi Liang & Mingxing Chen & Dadao Lu & Zijin Ding & Zhi Zheng, 2019. "The Spatial Evolution of Geoeconomic Pattern among China and Neighboring Countries since the Reform and Opening-Up," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Rimma Sagiyeva & Aziza Zhuparova & Rashid Ruzanov & Raigul Doszhan & Askar Askerov, 2018. "Intellectual input of development by knowledge-based economy: problems of measuring in countries with developing markets," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 711-728, December.
    6. Kappel, Robert, 2010. "On the Economics of Regional Powers: Comparing China, India, Brazil, and South Africa," GIGA Working Papers 145, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    7. Elena Širá & Roman Vavrek & Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2020. "Knowledge Economy Indicators and Their Impact on the Sustainable Competitiveness of the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Sajjad Barkhordari & Maryam Fattahi & Naser Ali Azimi, 2019. "The Impact of Knowledge-Based Economy on Growth Performance: Evidence from MENA Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 1168-1182, September.
    9. Jolanta Brodowska-Szewczuk, 2019. "Determinants of the development of enterprises’ innovativeness in the aspect of competitiveness of the economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1279-1295, December.
    10. Ibrahim Alnafrah & Sulaiman Mouselli, 2019. "The Knowledge Society Vis-à-vis the Knowledge Economy and Their Potential Development Impacts in Russia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 205-220, March.
    11. Ivy Chan & Patrick Y.K. Chau, 2005. "Getting Knowledge Management Right: Lessons from Failure," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 40-54, July.
    12. Stefan Luethi & Alain Thierstein & Michael Bentlage, 2011. "Interlocking firm networks in the German knowledge economy. On local networks and global connectivity," ERSA conference papers ersa10p120, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Myong-Hun An & Gyong-Yong Ri & Gwang-Nam Rim, 2020. "Intellectual Product and Method of Assessing the Competitiveness of an Enterprise with It," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1059-1085, September.
    14. Iryna Lomachynska & Ivelyna Podgorna, 2018. "Innovation Potential: Impact On The National Economy'S Competitiveness Of The Eu Developed Countries," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    15. Gwang-Nam Rim & Sun-Nam Jang & Chol-Ju An & Sun-Hui Hwang & Son-Hui Ri, 2020. "State Economic Strength and Some Methodological Issues on Its Assessment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 607-636, November.
    16. Benoît Godin, 2006. "The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 17-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Širá & Roman Vavrek & Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2020. "Knowledge Economy Indicators and Their Impact on the Sustainable Competitiveness of the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Diana Toimbek, 2022. "Problems and Perspectives of Transition to the Knowledge-Based Economy in Kazakhstan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1088-1125, June.
    3. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    4. Bilan, Yuriy & Oliinyk, Olena & Mishchuk, Halyna & Skare, Marinko, 2023. "Impact of information and communications technology on the development and use of knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Jin Xijie & Gwang-Nam Rim & Chol-Ju An, 2023. "Some Methodological Issues in Assessing the Efforts for the Circular Economy by Region or Country," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    6. Voxi Heinrich Amavilah & Antonio Rodriguez Andres, 2022. "Knowledge Economy and the Economic Performance of African Countries: A Seemingly Unrelated and Recursive Approach," Working Papers 57, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    7. Eustache Mêgnigbêto, 2018. "Correlation Between Transmission Power and Some Indicators Used to Measure the Knowledge-Based Economy: Case of Six OECD Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(4), pages 1168-1183, December.
    8. Iryna Lomachynska & Serhii Yakubovskiy & Ivan Plets, 2018. "Dynamics Of Austrian Foreign Direct Investment And Their Influence On The National Economy," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
    9. Ghazinoory, Sepehr & Nasri, Shohreh & Afshari-Mofrad, Masoud & Taghizadeh Moghadam, Negin, 2023. "National Innovation Biome (NIB): A novel conceptualization for innovation development at the national level," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    10. Jiaqi Wu & Wenbo Li & Wenting Xu & Lin Yuan, 2023. "Measuring Resident Participation in the Renewal of Older Residential Communities in China under Policy Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Ivanova, Inga & Strand, Øivind & Kushnir, Duncan & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2017. "Economic and technological complexity: A model study of indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 77-89.
    12. Hoang, Dung Phuong & Chu, Lan Khanh & To, Trung Thanh, 2023. "How do economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and natural resources rents affect economic complexity? Evidence from advanced and emerging market economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    13. Olatunji A. Shobande & Simplice A. Asongu, 2021. "Has Knowledge Improved Economic Growth? Evidence from Nigeria and South Africa," Working Papers 21/059, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    14. Xia Zhou & Shaoyong Lai, 2023. "The mutual influence of knowledge and individual wealth growth," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(6), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Gwang-Nam Rim & Sun-Nam Jang & Chol-Ju An & Sun-Hui Hwang & Son-Hui Ri, 2020. "State Economic Strength and Some Methodological Issues on Its Assessment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 607-636, November.
    16. Saeid Alaei & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Unveiling the role of sustainable supply chain drivers toward knowledge-based economy via a novel permutation approach: implications from an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1231-1250, September.
    17. T. Rodionova & S. Yakubovskiy & A. Kyfak, 2019. "Foreign Capital Flows as Factors of Economic Growth in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(4), pages 48-57, December.
    18. Diogo Pombo & Mário Franco, 2023. "A qualitative investigation of infusing products with service via strategic alliances among SMEs: a case of servitization," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 529-555, June.
    19. Tong-Ming Lim & Angela Lee, 2013. "A Study on the Knowledge Implementation Strategy and its influence on the Knowledge Sharing Attitude among Knowledge Workers and Individual Job Performance," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(12), pages 894-904.
    20. Priscila Celebrini de Oliveira Campos & Tainá da Silva Rocha Paz & Letícia Lenz & Yangzi Qiu & Camila Nascimento Alves & Ana Paula Roem Simoni & José Carlos Cesar Amorim & Gilson Brito Alves Lima & Ma, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision Method for Sustainable Watercourse Management in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:14:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-022-01054-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.