IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v92y2025i4d10.1007_s10898-025-01490-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double interdiction problem on trees on the sum of root-leaf distances by upgrading edges

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Li

    (Southeast University)

  • Xiucui Guan

    (Southeast University)

  • Junhua Jia

    (Southeast University)

  • Panos M. Pardalos

    (University of Florida)

Abstract

The double interdiction problem on trees (DIT) for the sum of root-leaf distances (SRD) has significant implications in diverse areas such as transportation networks, military strategies, and counter-terrorism efforts. It aims to maximize the SRD by upgrading edge weights subject to two constraints. One gives an upper bound for the cost of upgrades under certain norm and the other specifies a lower bound for the shortest root-leaf distance (StRD). We utilize both weighted $$l_\infty $$ l ∞ norm and Hamming distance to measure the upgrade cost and denote the corresponding (DIT) problem by ( $$\hbox {DIT}_{H\infty }$$ DIT H ∞ ) and its minimum cost problem by ( $$\hbox {MCDIT}_{H\infty }$$ MCDIT H ∞ ). We establish the $$\mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}$$ N P -hardness of problem ( $$\hbox {DIT}_{H\infty }$$ DIT H ∞ ) by building a reduction from the 0–1 knapsack problem. We solve the problem ( $$\hbox {DIT}_{H\infty }$$ DIT H ∞ ) by two scenarios based on the number N of upgrade edges. When $$N=1$$ N = 1 , a greedy algorithm with O(n) complexity is proposed. For the general case, an exact dynamic programming algorithm within a pseudo-polynomial time is proposed, which is established on a structure of left subtrees by maximizing a convex combination of the StRD and SRD. Furthermore, we confirm the $$\mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}$$ N P -hardness of problem ( $$\hbox {MCDIT}_{H\infty }$$ MCDIT H ∞ ) by reducing from the 0–1 knapsack problem. To tackle problem ( $$\hbox {MCDIT}_{H\infty }$$ MCDIT H ∞ ), a binary search algorithm with pseudo-polynomial time complexity is outlined, which iteratively solves problem ( $$\hbox {DIT}_{H\infty }$$ DIT H ∞ ). We culminate our study with numerical experiments, showcasing effectiveness of the algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Li & Xiucui Guan & Junhua Jia & Panos M. Pardalos, 2025. "Double interdiction problem on trees on the sum of root-leaf distances by upgrading edges," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 951-972, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:92:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-025-01490-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-025-01490-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-025-01490-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-025-01490-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    2. Cristina Bazgan & Sonia Toubaline & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2013. "Complexity of determining the most vital elements for the p-median and p-center location problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 191-207, February.
    3. Qiao Zhang & Xiucui Guan & Panos M. Pardalos, 2021. "Maximum shortest path interdiction problem by upgrading edges on trees under weighted $$l_1$$ l 1 norm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 959-987, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. N. Dinh & M. T. Thai & H. T. Nguyen, 2014. "Bound and exact methods for assessing link vulnerability in complex networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 3-24, July.
    2. Xiao Li & Xiucui Guan & Qiao Zhang & Xinyi Yin & Panos M. Pardalos, 2024. "The sum of root-leaf distance interdiction problem with cardinality constraint by upgrading edges on trees," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Wang, Zhuoyang & Chen, Guo & Hill, David J. & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2016. "A power flow based model for the analysis of vulnerability in power networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 460(C), pages 105-115.
    4. Ryan M. Hynes & Bernardo S. Buarque & Ronald B. Davies & Dieter F. Kogler, 2020. "Hops, Skip & a Jump - The Regional Uniqueness of Beer Styles," Working Papers 202013, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    5. Lenore Newman & Ann Dale, 2007. "Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 79-90, February.
    6. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    8. Alexander Shiroky & Andrey Kalashnikov, 2021. "Mathematical Problems of Managing the Risks of Complex Systems under Targeted Attacks with Known Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Anand, Kartik & Gai, Prasanna & Marsili, Matteo, 2012. "Rollover risk, network structure and systemic financial crises," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1088-1100.
    10. Yao, Jialing & Sun, Bingbin & Xi, lifeng, 2019. "Fractality of evolving self-similar networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 211-216.
    11. Sanjeev Goyal & Adrien Vigier, 2014. "Attack, Defence, and Contagion in Networks," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1518-1542.
    12. Britta Hoyer & Kris De Jaegher, 2023. "Network disruption and the common-enemy effect," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 117-155, March.
    13. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei, 2018. "Efficiency of complex networks under failures and attacks: A percolation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 658-664.
    14. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Hermans, Frans, 2025. "Using archetypal analysis to derive a typology of knowledge networks in European bioclusters," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 1-17.
    15. Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M., 2019. "Core and critical cities of global region airport networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 724-733.
    16. Diana Tampu & Carmen Costea, 2013. "Why society is a complex problem? A review of Philip Ball's book: Meeting Twentyfirst Century Challenges with a New Kind of Science," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 2(1), pages 80-89, March.
    17. Elosegui, Pedro & Forte, Federico D. & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel, 2022. "Network structure and fragmentation of the Argentinean interbank markets," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0124848 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Liu, Run-Ran & Chu, Changchang & Meng, Fanyuan & Jia, Chun-Xiao, 2025. "Hypergraph-based modeling of cascading failures with probabilistic node-to-group interactions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Liu, Run-Ran & Chu, Changchang & Meng, Fanyuan, 2023. "Higher-order interdependent percolation on hypergraphs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    21. Li, Yapeng & Qiao, Shun & Deng, Ye & Wu, Jun, 2019. "Stackelberg game in critical infrastructures from a network science perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 705-714.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:92:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-025-01490-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.