IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v21y2023i1d10.1007_s10257-022-00553-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for implementing robotic process automation projects

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas-Valentin Herm

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg)

  • Christian Janiesch

    (TU Dortmund University)

  • Alexander Helm

    (Deutsche Post)

  • Florian Imgrund

    (InnoBrain GmbH)

  • Adrian Hofmann

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg)

  • Axel Winkelmann

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg)

Abstract

Robotic process automation is a disruptive technology to automate already digital yet manual tasks and subprocesses as well as whole business processes rapidly. In contrast to other process automation technologies, robotic process automation is lightweight and only accesses the presentation layer of IT systems to mimic human behavior. Due to the novelty of robotic process automation and the varying approaches when implementing the technology, there are reports that up to 50% of robotic process automation projects fail. To tackle this issue, we use a design science research approach to develop a framework for the implementation of robotic process automation projects. We analyzed 35 reports on real-life projects to derive a preliminary sequential model. Then, we performed multiple expert interviews and workshops to validate and refine our model. The result is a framework with variable stages that offers guidelines with enough flexibility to be applicable in complex and heterogeneous corporate environments as well as for small and medium-sized companies. It is structured by the three phases of initialization, implementation, and scaling. They comprise eleven stages relevant during a project and as a continuous cycle spanning individual projects. Together they structure how to manage knowledge and support processes for the execution of robotic process automation implementation projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas-Valentin Herm & Christian Janiesch & Alexander Helm & Florian Imgrund & Adrian Hofmann & Axel Winkelmann, 2023. "A framework for implementing robotic process automation projects," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-35, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:21:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-022-00553-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-022-00553-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-022-00553-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-022-00553-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michał Morrison, 2019. "Risk Management in Automation of the Accounting Process," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Philip Linsley & Philip Shrives & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala (ed.), Multiple Perspectives in Risk and Risk Management, pages 231-239, Springer.
    2. Sorin ANAGNOSTE, 2018. "Setting Up a Robotic Process Automation Center of Excellence," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 307-322, June.
    3. Christian Langmann & Daniel Turi, 2020. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) - Digitalisierung und Automatisierung von Prozessen," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-658-28299-8, September.
    4. Tony Thistoll & Val Hooper & David Pauleen, 2016. "Acquiring and developing theoretical sensitivity through undertaking a grounded preliminary literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 619-636, March.
    5. Peter Hofmann & Caroline Samp & Nils Urbach, 2020. "Robotic process automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 99-106, March.
    6. Roman Beck & Sven Weber & Robert Wayne Gregory, 2013. "Theory-generating design science research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 637-651, September.
    7. Huang, Feiqi & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2019. "Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: A framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    8. John Venable & Jan Pries-Heje & Richard Baskerville, 2016. "FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 77-89, January.
    9. Kalinga Jagoda & Premaratne Samaranayake, 2017. "An integrated framework for ERP system implementation," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 91-109, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krakau, Jan & Feldmann, Carsten & Kaupe, Victor, 2021. "Robotic process automation in logistics: Implementation model and factors of success," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 219-256, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    2. Rainer Alt, 2021. "Electronic Markets on robotics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 465-471, September.
    3. Uklańska Anna, 2023. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 129-140, January.
    4. Raffaele Fabio Ciriello & Alexandra Cecilie Gjøl Torbensen & Magnus Rotvit Perlt Hansen & Christoph Müller-Bloch, 2023. "Blockchain-based digital rights management systems: Design principles for the music industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Bavaresco, Rodrigo Simon & Nesi, Luan Carlos & Victória Barbosa, Jorge Luis & Antunes, Rodolfo Stoffel & da Rosa Righi, Rodrigo & da Costa, Cristiano André & Vanzin, Mariangela & Dornelles, Daniel & J, 2023. "Machine learning-based automation of accounting services: An exploratory case study," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    6. Ingrid Bauer & Liudmila Zavolokina & Gerhard Schwabe, 2020. "Is there a market for trusted car data?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 211-225, June.
    7. Yasheng Chen & Zhuojun Wu & Hui Yan, 2022. "A Full Population Auditing Method Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Tom Lewandowski & Emir Kučević & Stephan Leible & Mathis Poser & Tilo Böhmann, 2023. "Enhancing conversational agents for successful operation: A multi-perspective evaluation approach for continuous improvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Hendrik Haße & Hendrik Valk & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2022. "Design Principles for Shared Digital Twins in Distributed Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 751-772, December.
    10. Rainer Alt & Jan Marco Leimeister & Thomas Priemuth & Stephan Sachse & Nils Urbach & Nico Wunderlich, 2020. "Software-Defined Business," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 609-621, December.
    11. Joshua Holstein & Max Schemmer & Johannes Jakubik & Michael Vössing & Gerhard Satzger, 2023. "Sanitizing data for analysis: Designing systems for data understanding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Laleh Rafati & Geert Poels, 2017. "Value-Driven Strategic Sourcing Based on Service-Dominant Logic," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 275-287, December.
    13. Rainer Alt, 2020. "Evolution and perspectives of electronic markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 1-13, March.
    14. SIPOS Csanád & MÁTÉ Domicián, 2020. "Industrial Environment Selection By Sourcing Strategy In The Case Of North African Countries," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 395-404, July.
    15. Vincent Schlatt & Johannes Sedlmeir & Simon Feulner & Nils Urbach, 2021. "Designing a Framework for Digital KYC Processes Built on Blockchain-Based Self-Sovereign Identity," Papers 2112.01237, arXiv.org.
    16. Emilio Abad-Segura & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar, 2020. "Research Analysis on Emerging Technologies in Corporate Accounting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-29, September.
    17. Heng Tang & Chang Boon Patrick Lee & Kwee Keong Choong, 0. "Consumer decision support systems for novice buyers – a design science approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    18. Simon Feulner & Johannes Sedlmeir & Vincent Schlatt & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Exploring the use of self-sovereign identity for event ticketing systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1759-1777, September.
    19. Julius Peter Landwehr & Niklas Kühl & Jannis Walk & Mario Gnädig, 2022. "Design Knowledge for Deep-Learning-Enabled Image-Based Decision Support Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 707-728, December.
    20. Roşca Vlad I., 2020. "Implications of Lewin’s Field Theory on Social Change," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 617-625, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:21:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-022-00553-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.