IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v15y2013i4d10.1007_s10796-012-9342-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory-generating design science research

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Beck

    (Goethe University Frankfurt)

  • Sven Weber

    (Goethe University Frankfurt)

  • Robert Wayne Gregory

    (University of Göttingen)

Abstract

A frequently mentioned challenge in design science research (DSR) is the generation of novel theory above and beyond information technology artefacts. This article analyzes the DSR process and extends established frameworks for theory generation to exemplify improvements to theory generation through methods of grounded theory development. On a conceptual base, we developed a theory-generating DSR approach which integrates methods of grounded theory development with established DSR methodology. This combination enables a design theorist to generate theoretical knowledge that extends the applicable knowledge base. We do not elaborate this combination on a meta-level, but rather provide a process model for researchers in form of an extension of a well-known DSR model to combine both methods in a pluralistic research design. With this suggested research approach, scholars can draw theoretical insights from analytical abstractions and can improve the development of IT artefacts in a structured way to avoid failure or repair loops.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Beck & Sven Weber & Robert Wayne Gregory, 2013. "Theory-generating design science research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 637-651, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:15:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-012-9342-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-012-9342-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-012-9342-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-012-9342-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    2. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    3. Richard Baskerville & Jan Pries-Heje, 2010. "Explanatory Design Theory," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(5), pages 271-282, October.
    4. Joseph G. Walls & George R. Widmeyer & Omar A. El Sawy, 1992. "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 36-59, March.
    5. W. M. P. van der Aalst & Akhil Kumar, 2003. "XML–Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 23-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingrid Bauer & Liudmila Zavolokina & Gerhard Schwabe, 2020. "Is there a market for trusted car data?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 211-225, June.
    2. Heng Tang & Chang Boon Patrick Lee & Kwee Keong Choong, 2017. "Consumer decision support systems for novice buyers – a design science approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 881-897, August.
    3. Heng Tang & Chang Boon Patrick Lee & Kwee Keong Choong, 0. "Consumer decision support systems for novice buyers – a design science approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    4. Simon Feulner & Johannes Sedlmeir & Vincent Schlatt & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Exploring the use of self-sovereign identity for event ticketing systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1759-1777, September.
    5. Vincent Schlatt & Johannes Sedlmeir & Simon Feulner & Nils Urbach, 2021. "Designing a Framework for Digital KYC Processes Built on Blockchain-Based Self-Sovereign Identity," Papers 2112.01237, arXiv.org.
    6. Lukas-Valentin Herm & Christian Janiesch & Alexander Helm & Florian Imgrund & Adrian Hofmann & Axel Winkelmann, 2023. "A framework for implementing robotic process automation projects," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-35, March.
    7. Laurence Brooks & M. Shahanoor Alam, 2015. "Designing an information system for updating land records in Bangladesh: Action design ethnographic research (ADER)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 79-93, February.
    8. Bo Yu & Rustam Vahidov, 2019. "Applying Social Interaction Theory to Negotiation Modeling: Design of E-negotiation System," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 703-718, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev & Matthew Smith & Isabelle Walsh, 2017. "Renewing Literature Reviews in MIS Research? A Critical Realist Approach," Working Papers hal-01648133, HAL.
    2. Stephan Diederich & Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2020. "Designing Anthropomorphic Enterprise Conversational Agents," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(3), pages 193-209, June.
    3. Fons Wijnhoven, 2012. "The Hegelian inquiring system and a critical triangulation tool for the Internet information slave: A design science study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1168-1182, June.
    4. Michael Blaschke & Uwe Riss & Kazem Haki & Stephan Aier, 2019. "Design principles for digital value co-creation networks: a service-dominant logic perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 443-472, September.
    5. Matthias Voigt & Katrin Bergener & Jörg Becker, 2013. "Comprehensive Support for Creativity-Intensive Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(4), pages 227-242, August.
    6. Richard Baskerville & Jan Pries-Heje, 2010. "Explanatory Design Theory," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(5), pages 271-282, October.
    7. Anders Dalén & Jan Krämer, 2017. "Towards a User-Centered Feedback Design for Smart Meter Interfaces to Support Efficient Energy-Use Choices," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(5), pages 361-373, October.
    8. Viviana Bastidas & Iris Reychav & Alon Ofir & Marija Bezbradica & Markus Helfert, 2022. "Concepts for Modeling Smart Cities," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 359-373, June.
    9. Lili Yang & Guofeng Su & Hongyong Yuan, 2012. "Design Principles of Integrated Information Platform for Emergency Responses: The Case of 2008 Beijing Olympic Games," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 761-786, September.
    10. Martin (Dae Youp) Kang & Anat Hovav, 2020. "Benchmarking Methodology for Information Security Policy (BMISP): Artifact Development and Evaluation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 221-242, February.
    11. David Tilson & Kalle Lyytinen & Carsten Sørensen, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 748-759, December.
    12. Hendrik Hilpert & Johann Kranz & Matthias Schumann, 2013. "Leveraging Green IS in Logistics," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(5), pages 315-325, October.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4907 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Raffaele Fabio Ciriello & Alexandra Cecilie Gjøl Torbensen & Magnus Rotvit Perlt Hansen & Christoph Müller-Bloch, 2023. "Blockchain-based digital rights management systems: Design principles for the music industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    16. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    17. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    18. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    19. Fatma Fourati-Jamoussi & Claude Narcisse Niamba, 2016. "An evaluation of business intelligence tools: a cluster analysis of users’ perceptions," Post-Print hal-03165570, HAL.
    20. Gebauer, Judith & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2013. "Joining Supply and Demand Conditions of IT Enabled Change: Toward an Economic Theory of Inter-firm Modulation," Working Papers 13-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    21. Xin Xu & Viswanath Venkatesh & Kar Yan Tam & Se-Joon Hong, 2010. "Model of Migration and Use of Platforms: Role of Hierarchy, Current Generation, and Complementarities in Consumer Settings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(8), pages 1304-1323, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:15:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-012-9342-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.