IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infotm/v26y2025i2d10.1007_s10799-023-00410-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Versioning for information goods with development costs

Author

Listed:
  • Yonghong Sun

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

Abstract

This study examines information-good versioning strategies for a monopoly firm and is novel in that it endogenizes quality choices with general consumer utility and firm cost. Specifically, consumer utility for good quality is monotonic and concave. The firm first develops the highest quality version at a certain cost and then disables some features to make low-quality versions at no cost. The results reveal that in the case of two user types, if the number of low-type users is small or the additional value they obtain from being served compared with not being served is small, the optimal strategy for the firm is to give them up. If this situation is reversed, it is optimal to serve them. Meanwhile, if their taste for quality is very close to that of high-type users, they should be offered the same quality as the latter. Otherwise, the firm should implement a versioning strategy. Second, with n user types, whether a unique quality is offered to a user type depends on the corresponding benefit–cost analysis. Finally, versioning can never be socially optimal, as the social optimum requires low-type users to purchase the same quality as high-type users. Further, versioning prohibition lowers social welfare if the firm is compelled to stop serving low-type users.

Suggested Citation

  • Yonghong Sun, 2025. "Versioning for information goods with development costs," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 235-246, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:26:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10799-023-00410-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10799-023-00410-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10799-023-00410-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10799-023-00410-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:26:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10799-023-00410-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.