IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v12y2021i6d10.1007_s13198-021-01329-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open-source software migration under sanctions conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Hossein Ronaghi

    (Shiraz University)

Abstract

Open-source software (OSS) has been widely used in the process of software development for the purpose of shortening the process development and reducing its costs. The growing process of OSS has put out new ways for development, distribution and correspondence of software in organizations. Countries under international sanctions are facing extreme limitations over financial transactions and technology transmissions with different countries; therefore, individuals and companies working in such territories are involved with legal limitations and limits of copyright as to using and having access to software. This research seeks to evaluate the acceptance of OSS in a country under sanction, that’s to say Iran. In this research the developed value-based acceptance model has been used. The statistical population of the study was individuals active in software and information technology industry in Iran. The sampling method was convenience sampling. The results indicated that the sanction has a significant effect on the perceived value of OSS (β = 0.72, p = 0.000) and eventually its usage. Besides, usefulness (β = 0.69, p = 0.001), perceived enjoyment (β = 0.54, p = 0.000) and facilitating conditions (β = 0.58, p = 0.002) are considered as factors effective in applying OSS. As a result, one of the solutions of technology development in sanctioned organizations is to use OSS.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Hossein Ronaghi, 2021. "Open-source software migration under sanctions conditions," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1132-1145, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:12:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01329-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01329-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01329-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01329-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navin A. Bapat & Tobias Heinrich & Yoshiharu Kobayashi & T. Clifton Morgan, 2013. "Determinants of Sanctions Effectiveness: Sensitivity Analysis Using New Data," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 79-98, January.
    2. Muwanguzi, Samuel & Musambira, George, 2019. "The adoption of open source software in Uganda: Analyzing stakeholders and their underlying interests," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Ronaghi, Mohammad Hossein & Forouharfar, Amir, 2020. "A contextualized study of the usage of the Internet of things (IoTs) in smart farming in a typical Middle Eastern country within the context of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Qu, Wen Guang & Yang, Zhiyong & Wang, Zhongming, 2011. "Multi-level framework of open source software adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 997-1003, September.
    5. Rajdeep Grewal & Gary L. Lilien & Girish Mallapragada, 2006. "Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1043-1056, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio M. Manenti & Stefano Comino & Marialaura Parisi, 2005. "From Planning to Mature: on the Determinants of Open Source Take-Off," Industrial Organization 0507006, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 Sep 2005.
    2. Xuan Yang & Xiao Li & Daning Hu & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Differential impacts of social influence on initial and sustained participation in open source software projects," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1133-1147, September.
    3. Tumusiime, Emmanuel & B. Wade, Brorsen & Mosali, Jagadeesh & Johnson, Jim & Locke, James & Biermacher, Jon T., 2011. "Determining Optimal Levels of Nitrogen Fertilizer Using Random Parameter Models," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 541-552, November.
    4. Amalesh Sharma & V. Kumar & Jun Yan & Sourav Bikash Borah & Anirban Adhikary, 2019. "Understanding the structural characteristics of a firm’s whole buyer–supplier network and its impact on international business performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(3), pages 365-392, April.
    5. Dequiedt, Vianney & Zenou, Yves, 2017. "Local and consistent centrality measures in parameterized networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 28-36.
    6. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Morgan, T. Clifton & Syropoulos, Constantinos & Yotov, Yoto V., 2021. "Understanding economic sanctions: Interdisciplinary perspectives on theory and evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Gandal Neil & Naftaliev Peter & Stettner Uriel, 2017. "Following the Code: Spillovers and Knowledge Transfer," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 243-267, September.
    8. Girish Mallapragada & Aditya Gupta & Brett Josephson, 2022. "The impact of social capital and transaction efficacy on salesperson performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3525-3542, September.
    9. Marjan Leber & Andrea Ivanišević & Jelena Borocki & Mladen Radišić & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Fostering Alliances with Customers for the Sustainable Product Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Julio Henrique Costa Nobrega & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Vasco Sanchez-Rodrigues & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Walter Leal Filho & Milena Pavan Serafim & Rosley Anholon, 2021. "Logistics 4.0 in Brazil: Critical Analysis and Relationships with SDG 9 Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Crozet, Matthieu & Hinz, Julian, 2023. "Blowback: The effect of sanctions on democratic elections," Kiel Working Papers 2246, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. William Seitz & Alberto Zazzaro, 2020. "Sanctions and public opinion: The case of the Russia-Ukraine gas disputes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 817-843, October.
    13. Comino, Stefano & Manenti, Fabio M. & Parisi, Maria Laura, 2007. "From planning to mature: On the success of open source projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1575-1586, December.
    14. Olga Lavrinenko & Svetlana Ignatjeva & Alina Betlej & Alina Danileviča & Vladimir Menshikov & Oleg Rybalkin, 2022. "Mobile internet in the EU: problems and perspectives," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(3), pages 369-383, March.
    15. Sun, Yutao, 2016. "The structure and dynamics of intra- and inter-regional research collaborative networks: The case of China (1985–2008)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 70-82.
    16. Stefan Behfar & Ekaterina Turkina & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2017. "Network tie structure causing OSS group innovation and growth," Post-Print hal-02153061, HAL.
    17. Wen Wen & Chris Forman & Stuart J. H. Graham, 2013. "Research Note ---The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement on Open Source Software Project Success," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1131-1146, December.
    18. Girish Mallapragada & Nandini Lahiri & Atul Nerkar, 2016. "Peer Review and Research Impact," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(1), pages 29-41, March.
    19. Chen, Xiaomeng & Forman, Christopher & Kummer, Michael E., 2021. "Chat more and contribute better: An empirical study of a knowledge-sharing community," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Kibae Kim & Wool-Rim Lee & Jorn Altmann, 2013. "Patterns of Innovation in SaaS Networks: Trend Analysis of Node Centralities," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2013104, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Jan 2013.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Open-source software (OSS); Sanction; Perceived value; Adoption intention; Perceived risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O36 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Open Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:12:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01329-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.