IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v55y2010i4p261-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sampling procedures and sample representativeness in a national telephone survey: a Portuguese example

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Correia
  • Paulo Dinis
  • Francisco Rolo
  • Nuno Lunet

Abstract

Despite the difficulties in reaching participants, this strategy may produce unbiased estimates for important health indicators. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2010

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Correia & Paulo Dinis & Francisco Rolo & Nuno Lunet, 2010. "Sampling procedures and sample representativeness in a national telephone survey: a Portuguese example," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(4), pages 261-269, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:55:y:2010:i:4:p:261-269
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0102-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00038-009-0102-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-009-0102-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blumberg, S.J. & Luke, J.V. & Cynamon, M.L., 2006. "Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: Evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(5), pages 926-931.
    2. Pridemore, William Alex & Damphousse, Kelly R. & Moore, Rebecca K., 2005. "Obtaining sensitive information from a wary population: A comparison of telephone and face-to-face surveys of welfare recipients in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 976-984, September.
    3. Weeks, M.F. & Kulka, R.A. & Lessler, J.T. & Whitmore, R.W., 1983. "Personal versus telephone surveys for collecting household health data at the local level," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 73(12), pages 1389-1394.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelle M Van Handel & Bernard M Branson, 2015. "Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Wagner James & Olson Kristen, 2018. "An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 211-237, March.
    3. Nicholas Economides & Katja Seim & V. Brian Viard, 2008. "Quantifying the benefits of entry into local phone service," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(3), pages 699-730, September.
    4. Turner, Heather A. & Finkelhor, David & Hamby, Sherry L. & Shattuck, Anne, 2013. "Family structure, victimization, and child mental health in a nationally representative sample," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 39-51.
    5. Koay Hean Wei & Khairiah Salwa Mokhtar, 2021. "The Role of Communication in the Process of Forming Market-Oriented Party (Mop): Its Importance and Approaches," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 12(1), pages 57-66.
    6. Turner, Heather A. & Finkelhor, David & Ormrod, Richard, 2006. "The effect of lifetime victimization on the mental health of children and adolescents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 13-27, January.
    7. Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher & Mick P. Couper & Eleanor Singer & Carrie A. Levin & Floyd J. Fowler Jr. & Sonja Ziniel & Peter A. Ubel & Angela Fagerlin, 2010. "The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 20-34, September.
    8. Ahmed, Firoz & Islam, Asad & Pakrashi, Debayan & Rahman, Tabassum & Siddique, Abu, 2021. "Determinants and dynamics of food insecurity during COVID-19 in rural Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Haan Marieke & Ongena Yfke P. & Aarts Kees, 2014. "Reaching Hard-to-Survey Populations: Mode Choice and Mode Preference," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Dickel, Petra & Graeff, Peter, 2018. "Entrepreneurs' propensity for corruption: A vignette-based factorial survey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 77-86.
    11. Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher & Mick P. Couper & Eleanor Singer & Peter A. Ubel & Sonja Ziniel & Floyd J. Fowler Jr. & Carrie A. Levin & Angela Fagerlin, 2010. "Deficits and Variations in Patients’ Experience with Making 9 Common Medical Decisions: The DECISIONS Survey," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 85-95, September.
    12. Cernat, Alexandru, 2014. "Impact of mixed modes on measurement errors and estimates of change in panel data," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2014-05, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    13. Michael R. Greenberg & Marc D. Weiner, 2014. "Keeping Surveys Valid, Reliable, and Useful: A Tutorial," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(8), pages 1362-1375, August.
    14. Tammy Henderson & Maria Sirois & Angela Chen & Christopher Airriess & David Swanson & David Banks, 2009. "After a Disaster: Lessons in Survey Methodology from Hurricane Katrina," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 28(1), pages 67-92, February.
    15. Christina J. Diaz & Stephanie M. Koning & Ana P. Martinez-Donate, 2016. "Moving Beyond Salmon Bias: Mexican Return Migration and Health Selection," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(6), pages 2005-2030, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:55:y:2010:i:4:p:261-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.