IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijogbc/v18y2023i1d10.1007_s42943-023-00076-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Structure and Firm Level Returns: The Indian Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Nidhi Kaicker

    (Dr. BR Ambedkar University (AUD))

  • Radhika Aggarwal

    (SMVD University, Network Centre)

Abstract

In addition to the standard risk factors suggested by asset pricing models, the extant literature shows mixed evidence of the impact of market structure on firm-level returns. Using data for 940 Indian firms listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange across 65 industries between FY 2010–11 to FY2018-19 and Lowess smoothing followed by a robust regression model with time fixed and industry effects, we find that firms in more concentrated industries earn lower returns, after controlling for the well-known determinants of asset prices. The relationship is stronger for firms that engage in non-price competition. Further, the explanatory power is better for industries with higher levels of concentration. Our study also provides an explanation on why firms operating in less concentrated environments are able to achieve high returns in the Indian context and provides important implications for both investors and the policymakers. Thus, the study is a novel attempt to examine the impact of not just the intensity of competition on firm level returns but also the type of competition in the case of a developing country, i.e. India.

Suggested Citation

  • Nidhi Kaicker & Radhika Aggarwal, 2023. "Market Structure and Firm Level Returns: The Indian Evidence," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 59-69, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:18:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s42943-023-00076-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s42943-023-00076-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42943-023-00076-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42943-023-00076-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    2. Lakonishok, Josef & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1994. "Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(5), pages 1541-1578, December.
    3. Gu, Lifeng, 2016. "Product market competition, R&D investment, and stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 441-455.
    4. David R. Gallagher & Katja Ignatieva & James McCulloch & Henk Berkman, 2015. "Industry concentration, excess returns and innovation in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(2), pages 443-466, June.
    5. Nawar Hashem & Larry Su, 2015. "Industry Concentration and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 769-785, August.
    6. Kewei Hou & David T. Robinson, 2006. "Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1927-1956, August.
    7. M. Cecilia Bustamante & Andres Donangelo, 2017. "Product Market Competition and Industry Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(12), pages 4216-4266.
    8. Sulaiman Mouselli & Aziz Jaafar, 2019. "Industry concentration, stock returns and asset pricing: The UK evidence," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1576350-157, January.
    9. Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & John van Reenen, 1999. "Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 66(3), pages 529-554.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryu, Doowon, 2022. "Product market competition and business groups in Korea," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    2. Huong Le & Andros Gregoriou & Tung Nguyen, 2023. "Advertising, product market competition and stock returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1605-1628, May.
    3. Tze Chuan (Chewie) Ang & Tarun Chordia & Vivian Van-Anh Mai & Harminder Singh, 2022. "The Marketing Capability Premium [Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models]," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(4), pages 918-959.
    4. Thu A. T. Pham, 2018. "Industry Concentration, Firm Efficiency and Average Stock Returns: Evidence from Australia," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 25(3), pages 221-247, September.
    5. Tseng, Kevin, 2022. "Learning from the Joneses: Technology spillover, innovation externality, and stock returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    6. Katarzyna Platt, 2020. "Corporate Bonds And Product Market Competition," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 43(3), pages 615-647, August.
    7. Doowon Ryu & Doojin Ryu & Joon Ho Hwang, 2017. "Corporate governance, product-market competition, and stock returns: evidence from the Korean market," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(1), pages 50-91, April.
    8. Zhang, Zhou, 2023. "Competition, investment reversibility, and equity risk premium," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Dou, Winston Wei & Ji, Yan & Wu, Wei, 2021. "Competition, profitability, and discount rates," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 582-620.
    10. Andrew Y. Chen & Tom Zimmermann, 2022. "Open Source Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing," Critical Finance Review, now publishers, vol. 11(2), pages 207-264, May.
    11. Liu, Hao & Gao, Ya-Chun, 2019. "The impact of corporate lifecycle on Fama–French three-factor model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 390-398.
    12. Tobek, Ondrej & Hronec, Martin, 2021. "Does it pay to follow anomalies research? Machine learning approach with international evidence," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Nawar Hashem & Larry Su, 2015. "Industry Concentration and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 769-785, August.
    14. Ryu, Doowon, 2020. "The US–Korea free trade agreement as a shock to product market competition: Evidence from the Korean stock market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    15. Cornett, Marcia Millon & Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg & Tehranian, Hassan, 2019. "Competitive environment and innovation intensity," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 44-59.
    16. Kewei Hou & Chen Xue & Lu Zhang, 2017. "Replicating Anomalies," NBER Working Papers 23394, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2010. "The Cross†Section of Expected Stock Returns: What Have We Learnt from the Past Twenty†Five Years of Research?," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 16(1), pages 27-42, January.
    18. Joachim Freyberger & Andreas Neuhierl & Michael Weber, 2020. "Dissecting Characteristics Nonparametrically," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 2326-2377.
    19. Taussig, Roi D., 2021. "Competition risk and expected stock returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    20. Chou, Pin-Huang & Ho, Po-Hsin & Ko, Kuan-Cheng, 2012. "Do industries matter in explaining stock returns and asset-pricing anomalies?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 355-370.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Market structure; Firm-level returns; Competition; India; Asset pricing; Industry concentration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:18:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s42943-023-00076-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.