IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ieaple/v25y2025i1d10.1007_s10784-025-09665-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic resources are, above all, information: perspectives from law, biology and economics

Author

Listed:
  • Luciana C. Silvestri

    (National Scientific and Technical Research Council – Argentina)

  • Marisa Roig-Cerdeño

    (Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (UNCuyo))

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Nagoya Protocol (NP) regulate access and benefit-sharing (ABS) regarding genetic resources. However, the Parties disagree on the scope of the expression “genetic resources,” a concept standing at the heart of this international regime. The increasing utilization of Digital Sequence Information (DSI) has exacerbated controversy. Ultimately, the rights and obligations of the Parties hinge on a shared understanding of what “genetic resources” are. This paper explores the concept of “genetic resources” from legal, biological, and economic perspectives and the various possible interpretations of the expression “genetic information.” Genetic resources are genetic information. The term “information” can convey three meanings: information for reality, information about reality, and data. Whether genetic resources are understood as information or data will depend on the context under analysis. In some scenarios, categorizing biological facts as either information or data may pose challenges. The expression “genetic data” would be most appropriate for denoting the intangible aspect of genetic resources in the framework of the DSI debate. In turn, “genetic” can also refer to different aspects of biological facts. Consistency with the NP requires an interpretation of the expression “genetic data” that encompasses data on the genetic and biochemical composition of genetic resources. If Parties to the CBD and NP acknowledged and agreed that genetic resources are information and distinguished the different denotations of the term “information,” meaningful solutions to DSI and the puzzle of the concept of “genetic resources” could be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Luciana C. Silvestri & Marisa Roig-Cerdeño, 2025. "Genetic resources are, above all, information: perspectives from law, biology and economics," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 127-143, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:25:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-025-09665-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10784-025-09665-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10784-025-09665-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10784-025-09665-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simpson, R David & Sedjo, Roger A & Reid, John W, 1996. "Valuing Biodiversity for Use in Pharmaceutical Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(1), pages 163-185, February.
    2. Antonio C. Allem, 2000. "The terms genetic resource, biological resource, and biodiversity examined," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 335-341, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy Craft & R. Simpson, 2001. "The Value of Biodiversity in Pharmaceutical Research with Differentiated Products," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Oliver Fromm, 2000. "Ecological Structure and Functions of Biodiversity as Elements of Its Total Economic Value," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 16(3), pages 303-328, July.
    3. Lauren Baker & Michael Dove & Dana Graef & Alder Keleman & David Kneas & Sarah Osterhoudt & Jeffrey Stoike, 2013. "Whose Diversity Counts? The Politics and Paradoxes of Modern Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Anastasios Xepapadeas & Eva Kougea & Parthenopi Ralli & Sofia Spyrou & Nicolaos Stavropoulos & Vasiliki Tsiaousi & Athanasios Tsivelikas, 2013. "Valuing Services Emerging from a Gene Bank: The Case of the Greek Gene Bank," DEOS Working Papers 1307, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    5. David Schap & Andrew T. Young, 1999. "Enterprise and Biodiversity: Do Market Forces Yield Diversity of Life?," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 19(1), pages 49-67, Spring/Su.
    6. Laurent Debroux & Giuseppe Topa & David Kaimowitz & Alain Karsenty & Terese Hart & Awono Abdon & Fidele Amsini & Conrad Aveling & Alain Bertrand & Mohammed Bekhechi & Carlo Bravi & Eric Chezeaux & Ken, 2007. "Forests in Post- Conflict Democratic Republic of Congo: Analysis of a Priority Agenda," Selected Books, CIRAD, Forest department, UPR40, edition 1, volume 1, number 10, March.
    7. Gollin, Douglas & Evenson, Robert, 2003. "Valuing animal genetic resources: lessons from plant genetic resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 353-363, July.
    8. Houdet, Joël & Trommetter, Michel & Weber, Jacques, 2012. "Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 37-46.
    9. GianCarlo Moschini, 2004. "Intellectual Property Rights and the World Trade Organization: Retrospect and Prospects," Chapters, in: Giovanni Anania & Mary E.. Bohman & Colin A. Carter & Alex F. McCalla (ed.), Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO, chapter 19, pages 474-511, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. John List & Jan Stoop & Daan van Soest & Haiwen Zhou, 2014. "On the Role of Group Size in Tournaments: Theory and Evidence from Lab and Field Experiments," Artefactual Field Experiments 00589, The Field Experiments Website.
    11. Rafat Alam & Nguyen Quyen, 2025. "Bioprospecting, drug choices and conservation of biological diversity under free trade," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 27(2), pages 109-138, April.
    12. Swallow, Stephen K., 1996. "Economic Issues in Ecosystem Management: An Introduction and Overview," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 83-100, October.
    13. Arnold, J. E. Michael & Perez, M. Ruiz, 2001. "Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 437-447, December.
    14. Cubbage, Frederick & Harou, Patrice & Sills, Erin, 2007. "Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 833-851, April.
    15. Augeraud-Véron, Emmanuelle & Fabbri, Giorgio & Schubert, Katheline, 2021. "Volatility-reducing biodiversity conservation under strategic interactions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Marcoul, Philippe & Weninger, Quinn, 2008. "Search and active learning with correlated information: Empirical evidence from mid-Atlantic clam fishermen," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1921-1948, June.
    17. Akpalu, Wisdom & Parks, Peter J., 2007. "Natural resource use conflict: gold mining in tropical rainforest in Ghana," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 55-72, February.
    18. Andrew Metrick & Martin L. Weitzman, 1998. "Conflicts and Choices in Biodiversity Preservation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 21-34, Summer.
    19. Melinda Smale & Nelissa Jamora, 2020. "Valuing genebanks," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(5), pages 905-918, October.
    20. Garrod, G. D. & Willis, K. G., 1997. "The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 45-61, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:25:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-025-09665-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.