IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this book or follow this series

Forests in Post- Conflict Democratic Republic of Congo: Analysis of a Priority Agenda

  • Laurent Debroux
  • Giuseppe Topa
  • David Kaimowitz
  • Alain Karsenty
  • Terese Hart
  • Awono Abdon
  • Fidele Amsini
  • Conrad Aveling
  • Alain Bertrand
  • Mohammed Bekhechi
  • Carlo Bravi
  • Eric Chezeaux
  • Kenneth Chomitz
  • Pauwel Dewachter
  • Jean-Pierre dÕHuart
  • Chimere Diaw
  • Gerhard Dieterle
  • Abderhamane Djire
  • Jef Dupain
  • Katrin Erdlenbruch
  • Nicolas Fauvet
  • Eric Forni
  • Jefferson Hall
  • Joseph Kakinda
  • Gaston Kalambay
  • Kapupu Diwa
  • Nadine Laporte
  • Raymond Lumbuenamo
  • Jean-Remy Makana
  • Joseph Makombo
  • Carole Megevand
  • Patrick Mehlman
  • Pierre Montagne
  • Augustin Mpoyi
  • Kankonde Mukadi
  • Robert Mwinyihali
  • Ousseynou Ndoye
  • Clotilde Ngomba
  • Bienvenu Ngoy
  • Stefano Pagiola
  • Jean-Marc Roda
  • Ivan Rossignol
  • Diane Russel
  • Nathan Schenkman
  • Rolf Schinkel
  • Kai Schmidt-Soltau
  • Carla Staver
  • Martin Tshamba
  • Richard Tshombe
  • Norbert Yambayamba

Forests are ubiquitous in the Democratic Republic of Congo; they touch the cultural and economic life of most of the population and have enormous global environmental significance. After years of conflicts and mismanagement, reconstruction is key to improving living conditions and consolidating peace. At the same time, better roads and trade bring risksÑthreatening forests and biodiversity by facilitating logging, land conversion, and the seizure of forest rights by vested interests. Anticipating these threats, in 2002, the transitional government started a Priority Reform Agenda. This report analyses the soundness of this Agenda, the progress achieved to date, and the priorities for the future. It emphasises the nature of forests as a public good; and the importance of the rule of law, transparency and public participation in managing natural resources. It highlights the multiplicity of claims on forests; calls for multipurpose participatory land-use planning; and emphasises the need to secure traditional user rights. Beyond the risks, the return of peace to the DRC also offers a unique opportunity to take a fresh look at the second-largest rainforest in the world, and to implement innovative strategies that give priority to the environment and to local people.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

in new window

This book is provided by CIRAD, Forest department, UPR40 in its series Selected Books with number 10 and published in 2007.
Volume: 1
Edition: 1
ISBN: 979-24-4665-6
Handle: RePEc:epf:ecbook:10
Note: language = english, 82p.
Contact details of provider: Postal: 42 rue Scheffer, 75116 Paris
Phone: 33 (0)1 53 70 20 00
Fax: 33 (0)1 53 70 20 00
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Paul Collier & V. L. Elliott & Håvard Hegre & Anke Hoeffler & Marta Reynal-Querol & Nicholas Sambanis, 2003. "Breaking the Conflict Trap : Civil War and Development Policy," World Bank Publications, The World Bank, number 13938.
  2. By Luc Leruth & Remi Paris & Ivan Ruzicka, 2001. "The Complier Pays Principle: The Limits of Fiscal Approaches Toward Sustainable Forest Management," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 48(2), pages 8.
  3. Loomis, John & Ekstrand, Earl, 1998. "Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 29-41, October.
  4. Rausser, Gordon C. & Small, Arthur A., 2000. "Valuing Research Leads: Bioprospecting and the Conservation of Genetic Resources," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt4t56m5b8, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
  5. Simpson, R David & Sedjo, Roger A & Reid, John W, 1996. "Valuing Biodiversity for Use in Pharmaceutical Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(1), pages 163-85, February.
  6. Stefano Pagiola & Konrad von Ritter & Josh Bishop, 2005. "Assessing the Economic Value of Ecosystem Conservation," Others 0502006, EconWPA.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epf:ecbook:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (JM Roda)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.